Skip to content

CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes

DYnamic CT Stress Myocardial perfusioN, CT Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary CT Angiography for Optimized treatMent Strategy In Patients With sTable Chest Pain syndromEs

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04709900
Acronym
DYNAMITE
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2021-01-14
Start date
2021-12-03
Completion date
2031-12-31
Last updated
2022-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Myocardial Infarction, Cardiovascular Diseases, Chest Syndrome, Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Failure, Stroke

Keywords

Cardiac CT, Chest pain, Coronary artery disease

Brief summary

The purpose of the DYNAMITE trial (Dynamic CT stress myocardial perfusion, CT fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT) and coronary CT angiography for optimized treatment strategy in patients with chest pain syndromes) is to determine the ability of combined anatomical and functional cardiac CT imaging to improve morbidity and mortality in patients with suspected or known ischemic heart disease.

Detailed description

Trial design The DYNAMITE trial is an investigator-initiated, randomised controlled, open-labelled trial conducted in the Capital Region of Copenhagen, Denmark The following hypothesis will be tested: * First primary hypothesis: A treatment strategy guided by combined dynamic CT myocardial stress perfusion, FFR-CT and CT coronary angiography improves clinical outcome compared with a conventional management strategy in patients with chronic chest pain syndromes * Second primary hypothesis: A treatment strategy guided by combined dynamic CT stress myocardial perfusion, FFR-CT and CT coronary angiography results in improved symptom relief compared with a conventional management strategy in patients with chronic chest pain syndromes

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCT angiography, FFR-CT and stress CT myocardial perfusion

The study intervention team consists of a specialist in Cardiac CT imaging, an invasive cardiologist, a thoracic surgeon and a cardiology nurse specialist. Treatment strategy defined by the study team based on CT findings involve referral for percutaneous coronary intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass surgery and/or initiation of optimal medical therapy, in addition to potential supplementary diagnostic procedures.

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chest pain in patients with clinically suspected or confirmed ischemic heart disease * Clinical indication for non-acute coronary evaluation * Status of coronary revascularization 1. With previous coronary revascularization - all patients 2. Without previous coronary revascularization 1. Age≥65 years - all patients with chest pain 2. Age\>50 - \<65 years - typical angina pectoris and at least one cardiovascular risk factor and/or previous myocardial infarction * Typical angina requiring all 3 criteria present: a) constrictive discomfort in the front of the chest or in the neck, jaw, shoulder or arm, b) precipitated by physical exertion c) relieved by rest or nitrates within 5 min. * Cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, current smoking, family history of ischemic heart disease, previous stroke, peripheral artery disease

Exclusion criteria

* Persistent chest pain and signs of ongoing acute myocardial ischemia requiring acute coronary intervention * Hospitalization and discharge with the confirmed diagnosis acute coronary syndrome (STEMI or NSTEMI) within the last 6 months * Severe valvular heart disease as primary diagnosis and/or in potential need of percutaneous or surgical valve treatment * Known severe heart failure (LVEF less than 35%) * Language, cultural or mental factors preventing the patient from understanding the informed consent form * Known atrial fibrillation * Known renal impairment (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate below \<30 ml/min) * Known x-ray contrast allergy * Known intolerance to adenosine infusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events3 yearscardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalization for heart failure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute myocardial infarction stratified by subtype12 monthsSubtypes of acute myocardial infarction according to Fourth Universal Definition 2018
Hospitalization due to unstable angina pectoris, bleeding, pacemaker and/or implantable/cardioverter defibrillator implantation, surgical or percutaneous heart valve treatment3 yearsCardiovascular hospitalizations
All-cause mortality3 yearsAll-cause mortality
Number and type of diagnostic tests performed12 monthsCardiac CT, Exercise ECG, perfusion Positron Emission Tomography, perfusion Single-photon emission computed tomography, perfusion magnetic resonance, invasive coronary angiography, invasive fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography
Number of invasive coronary test not leading to coronary revascularization12 monthsnumber of invasive procedures
Number of coronary revascularization3 yearsCoronary bypass surgery and/or percutaneous coronary intervention
Individual components of the primary endpoint3 yearscardiovascular death; acute myocardial infarction; stroke or hospitalization for heart failure
Cumulative radiation dose12 monthsCardiac CT, perfusion Positron Emission Tomography, perfusion Single-photon emission computed tomography, perfusion magnetic resonance, invasive coronary angiography, invasive fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography
Major procedural complications occuring during procedures (invasive, non-invasive or coronary revascularization)12 monthsdeath, cardiac arrest, cardiac arrhytmia, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, bleeding, unplanned revascularization and any complication requiring and/or prolonging hospitalizaation at least 24 hours
Minor procedural complication specific to type of procedure (invasive, non-invasive or during coronary revascularization)12 monthsMinor procedural complications
Patients diagnosed with non-cardiac disease as likely explanation for symptoms12 monthsnon-cardiac diseases causing chest pain
Seattle Angina Questionaire3 months and 12 monthsSeattle Angina Questionaire pre-randomization, 3 months and 12 months after randomization
Quality of life by EQ-5D-5L instrument3 months and 12 monthsQuality of life estimated by EQ-5D-5L instrument pre-randomization, 3 months and 12 months after randomization
Cumulative iodinated contrast volume12 monthsCardiac computed tomography, invasive coronary angiography, invasive fractional flow reserve, intravascular ultrasound, invasive optical coherence tomography

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactKlaus F Kofoed, MD
Klaus.kofoed@regionh.dk004535458569

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026