Skip to content

Guided Bone Regeneration Using Bovine-derived Xenograft in Combination With or Without Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin

Guided Bone Regeneration Using Bovine-derived Xenograft in Combination With or Without Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin: a Randomized-controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04709523
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-01-14
Start date
2017-01-04
Completion date
2020-11-23
Last updated
2021-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Resorption

Keywords

Guided bone regeneration, Bovine-derived xenograft, Injectable platelet-rich fibrin

Brief summary

The aim of the study was to compare the change in augmentation thickness after guided bone regeneration (GBR) using bovine-derived xenograft in combination with or without injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). This randomized-controlled clinical trial was conducted on patients with horizontal bone deficiency in the posterior regions of mandible. After implant placement, GBR procedures were randomly performed using i-PRF enriched bovine-derived xenograft (test group) or bovine derived xenograft alone (control group). Cone-beam computed tomography was taken at the implant sites immediately, and 6 months after surgery for assess the change in augmentation thickness as the primary outcome of the study. The secondary outcomes included marginal bone level and implant survival rate.

Detailed description

The study was conducted on patients who had partially edentulism with horizontal deficiency of the alveolar bone in the posterior regions of mandible. All patients were informed about treatment protocol of the study and also, the risks and benefits associated with participation. Each patient provided written informed consent prior to enrollment. Randomization was performed after the dental implant surgeries and the patients were randomly assigned to one of the study groups: Test group included 22 patients treated with GBR using i-PRF-enriched bovine-derived xenograft + resorbable membrane Control group included 22 patients treated with GBR using bovine-derived xenograft + resorbable membrane All patients underwent two-stage surgical protocol that performed by the same experienced surgeon. Following implant placement, i-PRF-enriched bovine-derived xenograft for the test group and bovine-derived xenograft alone for the control group was carefully positioned with light compression around the implants. Finally, the resorbable membrane was placed to cover the augmented area. As the second stage of surgery, healing caps were placed and the implant-supported fixed prosthesis were completed in approximately one to two months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREbovine-derived xenograft with i-PRF

Bovine-derived xenograft was mixed with i-PRF and was placed in the augmentation site.

PROCEDUREbovine-derived xenograft alone

Bovine-derived xenograft was placed in the augmentation site.

Sponsors

Ege University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* horizontal deficiency of the alveolar bone in the posterior regions of mandible * absence of periodontal disease or previously treated * with blood tests showing platelet counts at least 150.000 mm3 * ability to understand and accept the requirements of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* any disorders or infection at the implantation site or adjacent tissue * tooth loss or extraction in the planned implant site within 6 months * poor oral hygiene * medical conditions that compromised tissue healing (uncontrolled diabetes, etc.) * treatments with an interfering medications (bisphosphonates, steroids etc.) * smoking habit * pregnancy or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Augmentation thicknessat immediately and at 6 monthsthe change in augmentation thickness at surgical site.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal bone levelat immediately, at 6 months, at 12 months and at 24th monthsthe change in marginal bone level around the implants after prosthetic loading

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026