Skip to content

Prospective, Split-mouth, Comparative Study to Compare Clinical Outcomes of Two Different Posterior Composite

A 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of an Ultra-rapid Polymerizing Resin Composite

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04708223
Enrollment
51
Registered
2021-01-13
Start date
2018-09-01
Completion date
2022-05-16
Last updated
2025-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caries, Defective Tooth Restorations

Brief summary

The objective of this 2-year split mouth comparative study, a randomized controlled study, is to determine whether the simplified placement procedure of the ultra-rapid polymerizing Tetric PowerFlow/ Tetric PowerFill with a reduced light polymerization time (3 s), yields the same clin-ical results as widely used commercially available dental composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill) requiring up to 40 seconds of light polymerization time.

Detailed description

Patients, requiring posterior tooth restorations Class I and II or requesting amalgam restoration replacement, were treated in the clinical investigation. Each patient received two composite restorations in the posterior region.

Interventions

DEVICEDirect restorative treatment with fast-curing composites (Tetric PowerFill/ Tetric PowerFlow)

Tooth (teeth) affected by dental caries or with an existing defective filling will be restored. Adhese Universal in self-etch mode, was used to prepare the surfaces for the composite fillings. Tetric PowerFill/ Tetric PowerFlow (test group) was cured for 3 s.

DEVICEDirect restorative treatment with conventionally applied composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/ Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill)

Tooth (teeth) affected by dental caries or with an existing defective filling will be restored. Adhese Universal in self-etch mode, was used to prepare the surfaces for the composite fillings. Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/ Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill (control group) were conventionally cured for 10 s per increment.

Sponsors

Ivoclar Vivadent AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Split-mouth Design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Each subject must need at least 2 restorations in a vital posterior tooth (in different quadrants) * Restorations may be indicated for caries removal and restoration, replacement of defec-tive restorations (i.e. fractured, stained, unaesthetic), or requested replacement of un-aesthetic restorations. * Must have given written consent to participate in the trial * Must be available for the required follow-up visits over 2 years * Restored teeth must have occlusal contact with opposing teeth or restored teeth * Restoration width should be equal to or greater than 1/3 the distance from buccal to lin-gual cusp tips * 75% of the restorations Class II (minimum) and 25% Class I * One, two or three surfaces per restoration * Each Class II will have at least one proximal contact * 75% in molars (minimum) and 25% in premolars * All restored teeth must have at least one occlusal contact in habitual closure * Must have 20 or more teeth with evidence of bilateral posterior tooth contacts * Teeth that require one or no cuspal build-ups * Vital tooth * Preoperative sensibility on the teeth to be treated at maximum 3 on visual analog scale (10 = maximum) * Patient wishes to be treated in this clinical trial after oral information by the operator and after signing the informed patient form

Exclusion criteria

* Allergies to ingredients of the materials under investigation (monomers) * Do not meet all inclusion criteria above * Have medical complications (organ transplants, long term antibiotic or steroid treatment, cancer or are immunocompromised) or disabilities rendering them unable to tolerate the time required to complete the restorations or to provide adequate oral hygiene * Suffer from xerostomia either by taking medications known to produce xerostomia or those with radiation induced xerostomia or Sjogren's syndrome subjects * Have teeth with advanced or severe periodontitis, rampant caries or poor oral hygiene which may require extraction of the teeth to be restored * Present with any systemic or local disorders that contraindicate the dental procedures included in this study * Patients reporting having severe grinding/bruxing or clenching or in need of TMJ-related therapy * Have tooth with exposed pulp during preparation or caries removal or require indirect pulp capping * Inclusion of teeth that are non-vital or that exhibit signs of pulpal pathology (pulpitis) * If the working field cannot be maintained in a dry state for treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityBaselineassessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 No pain at all - 10 The worst pain imaginable) following the Fédération dentaire internationale (FDI) criteria on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Restoration Quality EvaluationBaselineassessed following the FDI criteria (patient view, tooth vitality, surface luster, surface staining, colour match, material fracture, marginal adaption, occlusal wear and tooth integrity) on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Fast-curing composites
Direct restorative treatment with fast-curing composites (Tetric PowerFill/ Tetric PowerFlow): Tooth (teeth) affected by dental caries or with an existing defective filling will be restored. Adhese Universal in self-etch mode, was used to prepare the surfaces for the composite fillings. Tetric PowerFill/ Tetric PowerFlow (test group) was cured for 3 s.
51
Fast-curing composites
Direct restorative treatment with fast-curing composites (Tetric PowerFill/ Tetric PowerFlow): Tooth (teeth) affected by dental caries or with an existing defective filling will be restored. Adhese Universal in self-etch mode, was used to prepare the surfaces for the composite fillings. Tetric PowerFill/ Tetric PowerFlow (test group) was cured for 3 s.
50
Conventionally applied composites
Direct restorative treatment with conventionally applied composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/ Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill): Tooth (teeth) affected by dental caries or with an existing defective filling will be restored. Adhese Universal in self-etch mode, was used to prepare the surfaces for the composite fillings. Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/ Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill (control group) were conventionally cured for 10 s per increment.
51
Conventionally applied composites
Direct restorative treatment with conventionally applied composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/ Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill): Tooth (teeth) affected by dental caries or with an existing defective filling will be restored. Adhese Universal in self-etch mode, was used to prepare the surfaces for the composite fillings. Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/ Tetric EvoFlow Bulk Fill (control group) were conventionally cured for 10 s per increment.
50
Total202

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFast-curing compositesConventionally applied compositesTotal
Age, Customized
18 to 80 years
51 participants51 participants51 participants
Age, Customized
<= 18 years
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
34 participants34 participants34 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
17 participants17 participants17 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 510 / 51
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 513 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 510 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity

assessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 No pain at all - 10 The worst pain imaginable) following the Fédération dentaire internationale (FDI) criteria on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 147 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 23 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 145 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 25 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Primary

Number of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity

assessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 No pain at all - 10 The worst pain imaginable) following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Time frame: 6 Month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 146 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 31 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 147 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 30 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Primary

Number of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity

assessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 No pain at all - 10 The worst pain imaginable) following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Time frame: 12 Month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 138 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Primary

Number of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity

assessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 No pain at all - 10 The worst pain imaginable) following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Time frame: 24 Month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Primary

Number of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity

assessed by tests with thermal stimuli and occlusal forces (during biting) determined by VAS (Visual Analog Scale, 0 No pain at all - 10 The worst pain imaginable) following the FDI criteria on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Time frame: 36 Month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 130 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 30 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 31 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 128 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesNumber of Teeth Analyzed According to FDI 11 - Postoperative HypersensitivityFDI 11 - Postoperative Hypersensitivity: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Secondary

Restoration Quality Evaluation

assessed following the FDI criteria (patient view, tooth vitality, surface luster, surface staining, colour match, material fracture, marginal adaption, occlusal wear and tooth integrity) on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 33 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 144 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 26 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 150 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 128 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 220 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 32 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 150 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 149 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 30 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 40 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 150 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 139 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 28 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 40 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 150 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 150 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 32 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 141 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 30 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 29 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 41 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 147 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 22 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 23 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 124 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 150 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 219 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 148 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 37 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 150 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 149 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 142 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 24 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 149 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 42 Teeth
Secondary

Restoration Quality Evaluation

assessed following the FDI criteria (patient view, tooth vitality, surface luster, surface staining, colour match, material fracture, marginal adaption, occlusal wear and tooth integrity) on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Time frame: 24 Month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 23 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 214 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 211 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 135 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 36 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 22 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 32 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 129 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 131 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 26 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 32 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 137 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 117 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 134 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 31 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 24 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 126 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 125 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 211 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 128 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 27 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 31 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 118 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 212 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 36 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 135 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 135 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 130 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 24 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 32 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 30 Teeth
Secondary

Restoration Quality Evaluation

assessed following the FDI criteria (patient view, tooth vitality, surface luster, surface staining, colour match, material fracture, marginal adaption, occlusal wear and tooth integrity) on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Time frame: 36 Month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 28 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 24 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 130 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 37 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 210 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 126 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 23 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 31 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 130 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 126 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 130 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 115 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 127 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 128 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 22 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationDI 13 - Tooth integrity: n/a3 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 120 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationDI 13 - Tooth integrity: n/a3 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 120 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 29 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 120 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 29 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 113 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 210 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 36 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 129 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 125 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 24 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 129 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 125 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 23 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 31 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 129 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 124 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 22 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Secondary

Restoration Quality Evaluation

assessed following the FDI criteria (patient view, tooth vitality, surface luster, surface staining, colour match, material fracture, marginal adaption, occlusal wear and tooth integrity) on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Time frame: 6 Month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 216 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 33 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 148 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 27 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 137 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 28 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 148 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 33 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 148 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 148 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 129 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 148 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 147 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 141 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 142 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 26 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 146 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 22 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 126 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 214 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 38 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 147 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 146 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 22 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 148 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 139 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 29 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 30 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 148 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 147 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Secondary

Restoration Quality Evaluation

assessed following the FDI criteria (patient view, tooth vitality, surface luster, surface staining, colour match, material fracture, marginal adaption, occlusal wear and tooth integrity) on a scale from 1 very good to 5 unacceptable

Time frame: 12 Month

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 23 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 117 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 30 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 40 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 218 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 24 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 139 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 34 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 22 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 133 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 24 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 135 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 32 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 138 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 31 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 139 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 21 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 22 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 31 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Fast-curing compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 132 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 24 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 1 - Surface luster: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 129 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 25 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 32 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 2 - Surface staining: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 117 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 218 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 31 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 3 - Color match: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 20 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 5 - Material fracture: FDI Score 3-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 133 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 22 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 30 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 41 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 6 - Marginal adaption: FDI Score 50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 136 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 7 - Occlusal wear: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 130 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 25 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 31 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 10 - Patient's view: FDI Score 4-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 11 - Tooth vitality: FDI Score 2-50 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 134 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 22 Teeth
Conventionally applied compositesRestoration Quality EvaluationFDI 13 - Tooth integrity: FDI Score 30 Teeth

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026