Skip to content

The PROGRAM-study: Awake Mapping Versus Asleep Mapping Versus No Mapping for Glioblastoma Resections

The PROGRAM-study: Awake Mapping Versus Asleep Mapping Versus No Mapping for Glioblastoma Resections

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04708171
Acronym
PROGRAM
Enrollment
453
Registered
2021-01-13
Start date
2022-01-01
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2022-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glioblastoma

Brief summary

The study is designed as an international, multicenter prospective cohort study. Patients with presumed glioblastoma (GBM) in- or near eloquent areas on diagnostic MRI will be selected by neurosurgeons. Patients will be treated following one of three study arms: 1) a craniotomy where the resection boundaries for motor or language functions will be identified by the awake mapping technique (awake craniotomy, AC); 2) a craniotomy where the resection boundaries for motor functions will be identified by asleep mapping techniques (MEPs, SSEPs, continuous dynamic mapping); 3) a craniotomy where the resection boundaries will not be identified by any mapping technique (no mapping group). All patients will receive follow-up according to standard practice.

Interventions

During an awake craniotomy, the patient is awake and cooperative during the resection of the tumor while the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

During asleep mapping under general anesthesia, the surgeon uses electro(sub)cortical mapping with evoked potentials (MEPs, SSEPs or continuous dynamic mapping) to prevent damage to eloquent areas.

During resection under general anesthesia without mapping, the surgeon does not use any intraoperative stimulation mapping techniques to identify eloquent areas.

Sponsors

Medical Center Haaglanden
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Francisco
CollaboratorOTHER
Erasmus Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years and ≤ 90 years 2. Tumor diagnosed as GBM on MRI as assessed by the neurosurgeon 3. Tumors situated in or near eloquent areas; motor cortex, sensory cortex, subcortical pyramidal tract, speech areas or visual areas as indicated on MRI (Sawaya Grading II and II) 4. The tumor is suitable for resection (according to neurosurgeon) 5. Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

1. Tumors of the cerebellum, brain stem or midline 2. Multifocal contrast enhancing lesions 3. Medical reasons precluding MRI (e.g. pacemaker) 4. Inability to give written informed consent (e.g. because of severe language barrier) 5. Second primary malignancy within the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated in situ carcinoma of any organ or basal cell carcinoma of the skin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurological morbidityBetween baseline and 6 weeks/3 months/6 months postoperativelyNIHSS deterioration of 1 point or more as compared to baseline value.
Extent of resectionAssessed within 72 hours on postoperative MRI scanResection percentage as assessed by an independent neuroradiologist on MRI contrast images with volumetric analysis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Onco-functional outcomeBetween baseline and 6 weeks/3 months/6 months postoperatively2D coordinate based on extent of resection (or residual tumor volume) on the x-axis and NIHSS score on the y-axis
Frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Between surgery and 6 weeks postoperativelyInfections, intracerebral bleeding, epilepsy, aphasia, paresis/paralysis in arms or/and legs (this is not an exhaustive list).
Progression-free survivalBetween surgery and 12 months postoperativelyProgression-free survival (PFS) defined as time from diagnosis to disease progression (occurrence of a new tumour lesion with a volume greater than 0.175 cm³, or an increase in residual tumour volume of more than 25%) or death, whichever comes first.
MRC deterioration (for motor gliomas)Between baseline and 6 weeks/3 months/6 months postoperativelyMRC deterioration of 1 point or more as compared to baseline value.
Residual tumor volumeAssessed within 72 hours on postoperative MRI scanPostoperative tumor volume in mm3 as assessed by an independent neuroradiologist on MRI contrast images with volumetric analysis
Overall survivalBetween surgery and 12 months postoperativelyOverall survival (OS) defined as time from diagnosis to death from any cause.

Countries

Belgium, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJasper Gerritsen, MD
j.gerritsen@erasmusmc.nl+31629119553
Backup ContactArnaud Vincent, MD PhD
a.vincent@erasmusmc.nl

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026