Skip to content

Role of Exposure in Hyperacusis

Effect of Psychoeducation Upon Exposure to Sounds and Hyperacusis Severity

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04705246
Enrollment
5
Registered
2021-01-12
Start date
2027-12-07
Completion date
2029-12-01
Last updated
2026-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperacusis

Brief summary

This study focuses on patients with a primary complaint of hyperacusis. Hyperacusis has been defined as 'abnormally reduced tolerance to sound'. It shows a high comorbidity with tinnitus, the perception of sound in the absence of a sound source. For the period of one month, hyperacusis and tinnitus severity and exposure to sounds will be evaluated by use of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) in all participants. A novel approach to assessments, EMA prompts participants during their daily life to answer short questionnaires, increasing ecological validity and minimizing the risk for recall and memory biases. At a randomized time point during the one-month period, participants will individually receive a single psychoeducation session (1h) delivered by an experienced audiologist. The goal of the study is to investigate if the psychoeducation session leads to an increase in exposure to sound and a decrease in hyperacusis severity.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPsychoeducation

The goal of the psychoeducation session is to provide insight in the hyperacusis symptoms, take away the fear of external noises, and encourage exposure to noise.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Antwerp
Lead SponsorOTHER
Universiteit Antwerpen
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* primary complaint of hyperacusis

Exclusion criteria

* primary complaint of misophonia * primary complaint of tinnitus * undergoing another therapy at the moment of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in EMA questions from baseline to end of the study8 random time points each day during the period of the study, from baseline and after intervention, though study completion for an average of 1 monthChange in questions concerning exposure, hyperacusis and tinnitus during the day from baseline measurement to last day of the study period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hyperacusis Questionnairebefore intervention, immediately post interventionHyperacusis severity self-report questionnaire, ranging from 0-42 with a higher score representing a higher sensitivity to sounds. A score of 28 is the cut-off for auditory hypersensitivity.
Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI)before intervention, immediately post interventionTinnitus severity self-report questionnaire, ranging from 0-100 with a higher score representing a more severe tinnitus

Contacts

CONTACTLaure Jacquemin, PhD
laure_jacquemin@uza.be038214233

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 30, 2026