Skip to content

Comparison of PolarX and the Arctic Front Cryoballoons for PVI in Patients With Symptomatic Paroxysmal AF

Comparison of the PolarX and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation - A Multi-Center Non-Inferiority Design Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04704986
Acronym
COMPARE-CRYO
Enrollment
202
Registered
2021-01-12
Start date
2021-03-29
Completion date
2025-07-24
Last updated
2026-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation, cryoballoon

Brief summary

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Single shot devices are increasingly used for PVI. Currently, Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is the most frequently used single shot technology and hence is the benchmark for upcoming technologies. A novel cryoballoon technology has recently been introduced (PolarX, Boston Scientific). However, whether PolarX provides effectiveness similar to the standard-of-practice Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is yet to be investigated. Given that PolarX was developed considering the reported limitations and potential failures associated with the Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon, it might be even more effective and safe for use in AF ablation procedures. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Given that the Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the standard-of-practice for single shot PVI and the PolarX is the novel technology, this trial has a non-inferiority design. The hypothesis with regards to the primary efficacy endpoint is that the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) shows lower efficacy compared to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) and that therefore more episodes of first recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia between days 91 and 365 will be observed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. Hence the alternative hypothesis postulates that the PolarX Cryoballoon is non-inferior to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon. Rejection of the null hypothesis is needed to conclude non-inferiority.

Interventions

Patients randomized to the Arctic Front cryoballoon group will undergo PVI using the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic). At the end of the procedure, an implantable cardiac monitor (Medtronic Reveal LINQ) will be implanted for the purpose of continuous arrhythmia monitoring.

DRUGPVI using the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific)

Patients randomized to PolarX cryoballoon group will undergo PVI using the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific). At the end of the procedure, an implantable cardiac monitor (Medtronic Reveal LINQ) will be implanted for the purpose of continuous arrhythmia monitoring.

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation documented on a 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG) or Holter monitor (lasting ≥30 seconds) within the last 24 months. According to current guidelines, paroxysmal is defined as any atrial fibrillation (AF) that converts to sinus rhythm within 7 days either spontaneously or by pharmacological or electrical cardioversion. * Candidate for ablation based on current AF guidelines * Continuous anticoagulation with warfarin (International Normalized Ratio \[INR\] 2-3) or a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) for ≥4 weeks prior to the ablation; or a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) that excludes left atrial (LA) thrombus ≤48 hours before ablation * Age of 18 years or older on the date of consent * Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)

Exclusion criteria

* Previous LA ablation or LA surgery * AF due to reversible causes (e.g. hyperthyroidism, cardiothoracic surgery) * Intracardiac thrombus * Pre-existing pulmonary vein stenosis or pulmonary vein stent * Pre-existing hemidiaphragmatic paralysis * Contraindication to anticoagulation or radiocontrast materials * Cardiac valve prosthesis * Clinically significant (moderately-severe or severe) mitral regurgitation or stenosis * Myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/ percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), or coronary artery stenting during the 3-month period preceding the consent date * Cardiac surgery during the three-month interval preceding the consent date or scheduled cardiac surgery/transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure * Significant congenital heart defect (including atrial septal defects or pulmonary vein abnormalities but not including patent foramen ovale) * New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV congestive heart failure * Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<35% * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (wall thickness \>1.5 cm) * Significant chronic kidney disease (CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] \<30 μMol/L) * Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism * Cerebral ischemic event (stroke or TIA) during the six-month interval preceding the consent date * Ongoing systemic infections * History of cryoglobulinemia * Pregnancy\* * Life expectancy less than one (1) year per physician opinion * Currently participating in any other clinical trial of a drug, device or biological material during the duration of this study. * Unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures and follow-up. * To exclude pregnancy a blood test (human chorionic gonadotropin \[HCG\]) is used.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Recurrence of Any Atrial Tachyarrhythmiadays 91 to 365 post-ablationNumber of patients with recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (atrial fibrillation \[AF\], atrial flutter \[AFL\] or atrial tachycardia \[AT\]) between days 91 and 365 post ablation as detected on continuous implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). AF, AFL or AT will qualify as a recurrence after ablation if it lasts 120 s or longer on ICM (the minimum programmable episode interval).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Complicationsdays 0 to 30 post-ablationComposite endpoint composed of: * cardiac tamponade requiring drainage * persistent phrenic nerve palsy lasting \>24 hours * serious vascular complications requiring intervention * stroke/TIA * atrioesophageal fistula * death
Total Procedure TimeDay 1Total procedure time from femoral vein puncture to sheath removal
Total Left Atrial (LA) Indwelling TimeDay 1Total LA indwelling time, from transseptal puncture to removal of LA catheters
Total Cryoablation TimeDay 1procedural endpoint
Total Number of Cryoapplications Per Patient/Per VeinDay 1procedural endpoint
Time to EffectDay 1disappearance of PV-Signal; procedural endpoint
Nadir TemperaturesDay 1procedural endpoint
Total Fluoroscopy TimeDay 1procedural endpoint
Radiation DoseDay 1procedural endpoint
Contrast Agent UsageDay 1unit measure ml; procedural endpoint
Number of Patients With Veins With PV Signals Visible Before CryoablationDay 1procedural endpoint
Number of Participants With Phrenic Nerve PalsyDay 1procedural endpoint
Number of Patients With Recurrence of Atrial Tachyarrhythmiabetween days 1 and 90 after ablationFollow up Endpoint
Overall AF Burden = % Time in AF91-365 daysAssessed by the ICM Core Lab post implantation
Number of Hospital Admissions or Emergency Room Visits Because of Documented Recurrence of Atrial ArrhythmiasDay 0 (after ablation) until day 365 post-ablationbased on telephone follow-up
Number of Electrical Cardioversion Because of Documented Recurrence of Atrial ArrhythmiasDay 0 (post-ablation) to day 365 after ablationbased on telephone follow-up
Number of Repeat Ablation Procedure Because of Documented Recurrence of Atrial ArrhythmiasDay 1 - 365 postablationbased on telephone follow-up
Evolution of Quality of Life (QoL)Change in score from BL to 12 monthsEvolution of Quality of Life (QoL) from BL to 12 months. Patients rated their health on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best possible score and 0 the worst possible score. A positive number in the outcome measure means that BL's health has improved at 12 months. A negative number in the outcome measure means that BL's health has declined at 12 months.

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORTobias Reichlin, MD

Inselspital, Bern University Hospital

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 202 subjects were randomized at 2 sites in Switzerland between March 29, 2021 and June 14, 2022. The last 3-year follow-up visit occurred on July 24, 2025.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
142 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1020 / 99
other
Total, other adverse events
7 / 1029 / 99
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 10219 / 99

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 25, 2026