Skip to content

The Effect of Semaglutide on Bone Turnover in Patients With Increased Risk of Bone Fracture

The Effect of Semaglutide (Ozempic) on Bone Turnover in Patients With Increased Fracture Risk: a Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04702516
Enrollment
64
Registered
2021-01-11
Start date
2021-03-24
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2021-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteopenia

Brief summary

The hypothesis for this study is that the GLP-1Ra Semaglutide has a positive effect on the balance between build-up and degradation as well as the strength of the bones in men and women aged 40-85 years at increased risk of bone fractures. Treatment involves injection of Semaglutide 1.34 mg/ml once a week or corresponding volume of placebo once a week for 52 weeks. The effect will be measured by bone markers in blood samples, bone scans, bone tissue tests (bone biopsy), and direct bone strength measured by microindentation at the start and end of the study.

Interventions

2 mg prefilled pen for subcutaneous injection, 0.25 mg for two weeks then 0.5 mg for two weeks and then 1 mg for another 48 weeks.

DRUGPlacebo

2 mg prefilled pen for subcutaneous injection, 0.25 mg for two weeks then 0.5 mg for two weeks and then 1 mg for another 48 weeks.

Sponsors

Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Morten Frost
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* T-score \<-1 in hip or lower back, assessed by DXA scan and / or * Low-energy fracture within the last 3 years

Exclusion criteria

* T-score \<-2.5 in hip or lower back, assessed by DXA scan, although these individuals may be included if they prefer to participate or are not candidates for conventional therapy, e.g., by eGFR \<35 or adverse reaction (influenza-like symptoms, allergic reaction, etc.) to, e.g., bisphosphonate therapy * Diabetes type 1 and 2 * Heart failure similar to NYHA Class IV * Primary hyperparathyroidism * Vitamin D deficiency (\<25 nM) (re-test after substitution acceptable) * Known disorders affecting bone metabolism, e.g., uncontrolled thyrotoxicosis, severe renal impairment (eGFR \<20) or liver function (baseline phosphatase higher than twice upper limit (105 U/L)), rheumatism, celiac disease, hypogonadism, severe COPD, hypopituitarism, Cushing's disease * Antiresorptive or bone anabolic drugs for the last 12 months * Use of anabolic steroids in the previous year * History of pancreatitis * Allergy to the medicines used * Inability to give informed consent * BMI \<20 kg / m2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP)Baseline and 52 weeksPercentage changes in bone formation marker P1NP from baseline and after 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Collagen 1 cross link C-terminal telopeptide (CTX)Baseline and 52 weeksChanges in bone resorption marker CTX from baseline and after 12 months
Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)Baseline and 52 weeksChanges in bone resorption marker TRAP from baseline and after 12 months
OsteocalcinBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in bone formation marker osteocalcin from baseline and after 12 months
Bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP)Baseline and 52 weeksChanges in bone formation marker BALP from baseline and after 12 months
BMSiBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in direct bone strength measured by microindentation from baseline and after 12 months
Bone mineral density (BMD)Baseline and 52 weeksChanges in BMD (total hip, femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-4)) assessed by DXA scans from baseline and after 12 months
Estimated bone strengthBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in estimated bone strength assessed by finite elemental analysis (HR-pQCT scan) from baseline and after 12 months
Trabecular volumetric BMDBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in trabecular volumetric BMD (mg/cm\^3) assessed by HR-pQCT scan of distal tibia and radius
Cortical volumetric BMDBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in cortical volumetric BMD (mg/cm\^3) assessed by HR-pQCT scan of distal tibia and radius
Bone volumeBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in trabecular bone volume pr total volume (BV/TV) assessed by HR-pQCT scan of distal tibia and radius
Trabecular thicknessBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in trabecular thickness (mm) assessed by HR-pQCT scan of distal tibia and radius
Cortical thicknessBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in cortical thickness (mm) assessed by HR-pQCT scan of distal tibia and radius
Cortical porosityBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in cortical porosity assessed by HR-pQCT scan of tibia and radius
Bone formation rate52 weeksChanges in bone formation rate (BRF/BS, µm\^3/µm\^2 per day), the volume of mineralized bone made per unit surface of bone per year
Total volumetric BMDBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in total volumetric BMD (mg/cm\^3) assessed by HR-pQCT scan of distal tibia and radius

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mirco RNAsBaseline and 52 weeksChanges in expression of blood-circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) known to be involved in regulation of bone formation and bone resorption using qPCR

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactMorten Steen Svarer Hansen, MD
morten.steen.hansen@rsyd.dk+4521249531
Backup ContactMorten Frost, MD
mmfnielsen@health.sdu.dk

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026