Skip to content

Specific Training After Stoma Surgery

Specific Training After Stoma Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04701853
Acronym
STASS
Enrollment
240
Registered
2021-01-08
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colon Cancer

Keywords

Hernia, Abdominal muscles, Stabilizing training

Brief summary

In Sweden, approximately 43,000 people have undergone surgery with ileo-, colo- or urostomy. The most common type of stomy is a sigmoidostomy. A large proportion, about 50%, of patients who receive a permanent sigmoidostomy develop a parastomal hernia which may have major impact. There are indications that specific abdominal exercise may reduce the risk of parastomal hernias, but randomized studies are lacking. The aims of the study are: 1. to evaluate the effect of specific exercise to counteract the development of parastomal hernia in sigmoidostomy and the hernia's impact on ostomy function, physical function and quality of life. 2. to examine patients' experience of living with parastomal hernia. The study plans to include 240 patients who on will undergo surgery and receive a sigmoidostomy. These will be randomized to receive only advice according to the usual routine to avoid the development of parastomal hernia or these advice with the addition of specific abdominal muscle training. The training is initiated before the operation and is then carried out during the first postoperative year. Follow-up will be done with a clinical assessment and with measurement of bulge and size of the parastomal hernia manually, with electronic measuring equipment and via computed tomography images. Patients will assess their stoma and stoma function and assess any discomfort and its consequences of hernia via a study-specific questionnaire. Type of ostomy bandage will also be registered. The evaluation will be carried out 6, 12 and 36 months postoperatively. Prior to the start of sub-study a, the planned measurement methods to assess whether a parastomal hernia is present will be tested for validity. In addition, a group of patients (≥15 people) with parastomal hernia will be included in a qualitative sub-study where they will be interviewed about their experiences of the hernia hernia and how it may affect daily life. The present study will be able to answer whether specific exercise can reduce the risk of parastomal hernia. Methods for clinically assessing and evaluating bulging and hernias will be tested and evaluated in relation to patient-reported symptoms. In addition, the study will provide information about the patient's experience of having a parastomal hernia and how it affects daily life and physical activity. The results will provide an increased understanding of parastomal hernias, which may change the follow-up of patients in the future.

Interventions

OTHERSpecific abdominal muscle training

Specific abdominal muscle training

OTHERUsual care

Care according to each center.

Sponsors

Göteborg University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Assessor will not be aware of which group the patients are included in.

Intervention model description

A single blind, randomized, controlled, intervention study. Evaluation of the addition of specific muscle training for patients undergoing intestine surgery including a sigmoidostomy compared to standard care

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- A consecutive series of patients who are scheduled to have a permanent sigmoidostomy

Exclusion criteria

* Not Swedish speaking * Impaired cognitive ability * Physical disability that limits the possibility of carrying out the intervention. * Lung disease including chronic cough. * Previous hernia in the abdominal wall. * Previous open abdominal surgery with scars ≥20 cm * Spread malignant disease at inclusion * Acute surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parastomal hernia verified by computer tomography6 to 36 months after surgeryNumber of verified parastomal hernia by computer tomography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of parastomal hernia6 to 36 months after surgerySize of the hernia by caliper and app
Stomal function- symptoms6 to 36 months after surgeryQuestionnaire including stomal function, by Smietanski. 15 items answered by Likert scales from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst imaginable symptoms)
Stomal function in daily life6 to 36 months after surgeryQuestionnaire including stomal function in normal life, by Hjortswang 2006. Four questions which are answered by 6-levels Lickert scales from no (0) tom maximal (5) symptoms.
Manual evaluation of parastomal hernia6 to 36 months after surgeryVisual evaluation of parastomal hernia assessed by Yes/No/Unsure
Stoma specific Quality of Life6 to 36 months after surgeryStoma-QoL by Kald et al 2009. 20 questions with answers from 1 (always) to not at all (4).
Physical activity levelPreoperatively to 36 months after surgeryGrimby Scale, A scale from 1-6 where a higher score indicates higher level of physical activity
Back painPreoperatively to 36 months after surgeryBack pain questionnaire by Granström et al 2020. Includes two visual analogue scales from 0 (no pain ) to 100 (Worst imaginable pain) mm and six questions which are answered on a Likert scale (4-5 levels) from no to maximal symptoms.
Generic Quality of life6 to 36 months after surgeryEQ-5D Swedish version. 5 questions where lower scores indicate higher quality of life.

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactMonika Fagevik Olsén, PhD
monika.fagevik-olsen@vgregion.se+46313421195
Backup ContactMonika Fagev ik Olsén, PhD
monika.fagevik-olsen@vgregion.se+4631 342 1195

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026