Skip to content

Does the Length of Hospital Stay for Rehabilitation Affect Functional Outcomes in Stroke Patients

Does the Length of Hospital Stay for Rehabilitation Affect Functional Outcomes in Stroke Patients: A Retrospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04700982
Enrollment
97
Registered
2021-01-08
Start date
2020-10-07
Completion date
2020-11-01
Last updated
2021-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Neurological Rehabilitation, Stroke, Rehabilitation Outcome

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the length of hospital stay for rehabilitation affects functional outcomes of stroke patients.

Detailed description

The medical records of patients who were admitted to a rehabilitation unit were analyzed retrospectively. The functional output, the level of spasticity, and the level of motor development at admission and discharge will be determined using the Functional Independence Measure instrument, the Modified Ashworth Scale, and the Brunnstrom test, respectively. Based on the length of hospital stay, patients will be divided into two groups: hospital stays ≤ 3 months (Group 1) and \> 3 months (Group 2). Clinical features and functional output will be compared between the groups.

Interventions

OTHERBased on the length of hospital stay

Based on the length of hospital stay, patients were divided into two groups: hospital stays ≤ 3 months (Group 1) and \> 3 months (Group 2).Clinical features and functional output will be then compared between the groups.

Sponsors

Baskent University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of stroke * must be able to receive rehabilitation in an inpatient clinic between 2010 and 2013

Exclusion criteria

* previous history of stroke, * other neurological diseases, * amputation, * severe arthritis * undergoing hemodialysis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical features and Functional Independence Measure instrument, the Modified Ashworth Scale, and the Brunnstrom test outcomes will be then compared between the groups.through study completion, an average of 1 monthDemographic features, clinical features and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument, the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), and the Brunnstrom test outcomes will be documented for all patients. The FIM includes 18 items with higher scores indicating greater independence. The motor development of the upper extremity, hand, and lower extremity will be evaluated using the Brunnstrom test with higher stages indicating greater development. The degree of spasticity of the upper and lower extremity muscles will be assessed using the MAS with high stage indicating greater spasticity. All patients will be divided into two groups based on length of hospital stay. Clinical features, demographic features and FIM, MAS, and the Brunnstrom test outcomes will be then compared between the groups. All data for normality were tested with Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests. Mann-Whitney U tests will be used for comparison of the differences between the two groups.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026