Skip to content

Onset PrevenTIon of Urinary Retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and Rehabilitation

Onset PrevenTIon of Urinary Retention in Orthopaedic Nursing and Rehabilitation, OPTION - a Knowledge Implementation Study on a Facilitation Strategy for Multi-professional Clinical Champion Teams

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04700969
Acronym
OPTION
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-01-08
Start date
2020-12-15
Completion date
2027-05-30
Last updated
2025-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Arthritis, Hip Fractures, Urinary Retention

Keywords

Orthopedics, Implementation, Research utilization

Brief summary

Urinary retention (UR) is a common problem in older people undergoing hip surgery. Untreated UR can lead to bladder distention and a permanent damage of the bladder, which can cause both physical and psychical suffering as well as increased costs for society. Even if national and international practice guidelines are in place for handling UR within the health care system, many fail to comply with them. Compliance to clinical practice guidelines are improved if different professions and managers collaborate as a team. In OPTION (Onset PrevenTIon of urinary retention in Orthopedic Nursing and rehabilitation) the investigators will coach multi-professional local facilitator teams in knowledge translation and implementation of UR practice as well as investigate the effects of such evidence-based practice in orthopedic nursing and rehabilitation. Implementation of research-based knowledge in evidence-based practice within an organization is complex with several known interacting factors. In a health care system these factors can be the care context, knowledge (innovation) and how the organization facilitates such implementations. The implementation strategy of OPTION utilize established theories of facilitation of knowledge implementation considering evidence and context with focus on leadership. The intervention consists of seminars and systematic support for implementation of UR-guidelines OPTION combine studies of adherence to evidence based practice regarding UR for patients over 65 years old that has undergone hip surgery and the health economic aspects of it. OPTION also contribute with improvements and increased knowledge regarding strategies to implement evidence based health care that can be used in other areas than UR and hip surgeries.

Interventions

OTHER: A support program to facilitate implementation of evidence-based practice for postoperative urinary retention

A 12-month implementation support program for multi-professional internal facilitator teams

Sponsors

Linkoeping University
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Karolinska Institutet
CollaboratorOTHER
Örebro University, Sweden
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Orthopaedic units in Sweden performing hip surgery. -

Exclusion criteria

Orthopaedic units in Sweden not performing hip surgery \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to UR guidelines in the care of patients undergoing hip surgery.Change from base line to 1 year after the interventionAdherence to national urinary retention guidelines documented in the patients' medical record

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient participationChange from base line to 1 year after the interventionThe Patient Preferences for Patient Participation tool (The 4Ps)
Costs related to URChange from base line to 1 year after the interventionCosts for device and labour for bladder scanning and urinary catheterization
The IFs', staff's, and managers' experience of UR careChange from base line to 1 year after the interventionInvestigated with qualitative interviews
Number of hip surgery patients with URChange from base line to 1 year after the interventionNumber of hip surgery patients with UR documented in the patients' medical record
The experience of people undergoing hip surgery, regarding UR, UR care.Change from base line to 1 year after the interventionInvestigated with qualitative interviews
The impact of a knowledge translation support program on the peoples' experience of the aboveChange from base line to 1 year after the interventionInvestigated with qualitative interviews
The IFs', staff's, and managers' experience of the facilitation program1 year after the interventionInvestigated with qualitative interviews

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026