Skip to content

Ultrasound Assessment of Diaphragmatic Dysfunction in Regional Anesthesia

Ultrasound Assessment of Diaphragmatic Dysfunction: General Versus Regional Anesthesia for Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Pulmonary Biopsy in Interstitial Lung Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04700943
Enrollment
41
Registered
2021-01-08
Start date
2019-02-01
Completion date
2021-01-01
Last updated
2021-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diaphragm Issues, Regional Anesthesia, Thoracic Surgery, Ultrasounds

Keywords

Ultrasounds, diaphragmatic function, thoracic surgery, regional anesthesia

Brief summary

Awake thoracic surgery is a feasible and safe alternative to general anesthesia for pulmonary biopsy in interstitial lung disease patients, but there is still no evidence as to its superiority in terms of outcome. However, there is extensive literature about the effect of anesthetic drugs and surgery on diaphragmatic function. Furthermore, in thoracic surgery, diaphragmatic dysfunction was associated with a higher occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications. To assess the impact of general anesthesia on diaphragmatic function, the investigators conducted an observational prospective trial. The investigators measured both diaphragmatic excursion and Thickening Fraction at baseline and 12 hours after surgery together with pulmonary function tests and gas exchange data.

Detailed description

Awake thoracic surgery is a feasible and safe alternative to general anesthesia for pulmonary biopsy in interstitial lung disease patients, but there is still no evidence as to its superiority in terms of outcome. However, there is extensive literature about the effect of anesthetic drugs and surgery on diaphragmatic function. Furthermore, in thoracic surgery, diaphragmatic dysfunction was associated with a higher occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications. To assess the impact of general anesthesia on diaphragmatic function, the investigators conducted an observational prospective trial. The investigators measured both diaphragmatic excursion and Thickening Fraction at baseline and 12 hours after surgery together with pulmonary function tests and gas exchange data. The investigators divided our population into two groups: one group of patients undergoing awake thoracic surgery with epidural anesthesia, and the other group undergoing general anesthesia. Forty-one patients were recruited and the Thickening Fraction percentage, calculated as (End Inspiratory thickness-End Expiratory thickness)/End Expiratory thickness, was evaluated by means of an ultrasound-assisted method, using a high frequency (10 MHz) linear probe.

Interventions

PROCEDURERegional awake anesthesia

We want to assess the impact of regional anesthesia on diaphragmatic function in patients undergoing Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pulmonary biopsy in interstitial lung disease

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for lung biopsy from February 2019 to September 2020

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy, * Body Mass Index \>35, * Inability to provide informed consent, * American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification score of IV * Recommended postoperative ICU care

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diaphragmatic maximal function12 hoursMeasured with diaphragmatic excursion

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain scores24 hoursNumeric rate scale
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting24 hoursPresence/absence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026