Skip to content

Effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligent Tutoring System in Simulation Training

Comparing the Virtual Operative Assistant to Expert-based Instruction in Surgical Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04700384
Enrollment
70
Registered
2021-01-07
Start date
2021-01-15
Completion date
2021-05-15
Last updated
2021-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Education

Keywords

Virtual Reality, Simulation

Brief summary

Brief Summary: Background: Although surgical experience and technical skill are associated with better patient outcomes, quantitating surgical ability in the operating room is challenging. In surgical education, large datasets generated by high-fidelity virtual reality simulators can be employed by machine learning algorithms to objectively measure trainee performance and competence on expert benchmarks. This allows repetitive practice of surgical skills in safe and risk-free environments with immediate feedback. Our group developed and has a patent pending for an intelligent tutoring system called the Virtual Operative Assistant (VOA). Utilizing an Artificial Intelligence (AI) support vector machine algorithm, the VOA assesses data derived from the NeuroVR (CAE Healthcare) simulator platform and provides individualized audiovisual feedback to improve learner performance during simulated brain tumor resections. The effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems such as the VOA to the human surgical apprenticeship pedagogy remains to be elucidated. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and educational impact of personalized VOA feedback to expert instruction on medical student's technical skills learning of a virtual reality tumor resection procedure. Specific Aims: 1) To assess if medical students receiving personalized VOA feedback statistically improve their surgical performance when compared to those having (a) no expert instructor feedback or (b) expert instructor-mediated feedback. 2) To outline if different emotions are elicited by the VOA intelligent tutoring system in medical students while performing this achievement task as compared to human instruction

Detailed description

Design: A three-arm partially blinded randomized controlled trial of VOA training versus remote-based expert instruction versus control. Setting: Neurosurgical Simulation and Artificial Intelligence Learning Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute. Participants: Eligible first- and second-year medical students from across the province of Quebec. Task: Complete removal of a simulated tumour - distinguishable by colour and haptic properties - with minimal bleeding and damage to surrounding healthy brain using two surgical instruments (Cavitron Ultrasonic Aspirator and Bipolar pincers) of the NeuroVR (CAE Healthcare) surgical simulator. Intervention: A single 75-minute training session, including six virtual subpial tumour resection attempts (five simple practice scenarios and one complex realistic scenario) with assessment and feedback from either: 1. the VOA intelligent tutoring system (Group 2) or 2. a remote-based expert instructor (Group 3) Both compared to: 3. control group (Group 1) that receives no assessment or performance feedback. To our knowledge this will be the first study to compare the effectiveness of an AI-powered intelligent tutoring system to expert instruction in the context of medical and surgical virtual reality simulation and assess the emotional response to such instruction. This study aims to begin to identify successful approaches to use this innovative technology in the medical educational curriculum and improve patient outcomes by augmenting safety, efficiency and competency of surgeons and other healthcare providers.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVirtual Operative Assistant Training

Individuals receive the same basic information, have the same amount of time and perform the same scenarios as the control group. In the 5-minutes between attempts, participant receive the Virtual Operative Assistant assessment of their performance and audiovisual feedback.

BEHAVIORALRemote-Based Expert Instructor Training

Individuals receive the same information, have the same amount of time and perform the same scenarios as the control group. Meanwhile, a trained instructor observes the participant's on-screen performance, that is live-streamed, remotely. Instructors are senior neurosurgery residents with extensive experience in performing and assessing this scenario. During the 5-minute feedback session, they chat with the student, discussing the performance and help in setting goals for the next trial.

Sponsors

McGill University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants will not know the purpose of trial

Intervention model description

Randomized Controlled Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

• First- and second-year medical students from any Canadian institution who do not meet the

Exclusion criteria

. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in procedural performance .Day of StudyPerformance in each practice attempt is measured utilizing raw data from the simulator that is used for assessment by previously established AI algorithms on validated metrics.
Change in learningDay of StudyPerformance on the complex realistic scenario is evaluated by expert instructors using the Objective Structured Assessments of technical Skills (OSATS) Visual Rating Scale (weighted at 50%) and the AI assessment algorithms (weighted at 50%) creating a composite performance score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in the strength of emotions elicitedDay of StudyMeasured using Duffy's Medical Emotions Scale (MES), before, during and after the intervention.
Difference in cognitive loadDay of StudyMeasured using Leppink's Cognitive Load Index (CLI) after the intervention.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026