Skip to content

Exercise and PRP vs Exercise Alone in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

The Combination of Exercise and PRP vs Exercise Alone in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04697667
Enrollment
84
Registered
2021-01-06
Start date
2021-01-31
Completion date
2022-02-10
Last updated
2026-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

This study is a prospective randomized controlled study of different treatments for knee osteoarthritis and aims to investigate the efficacy of exercise combined platelet rich plasma (PRP) injection versus only exercise or only PRP treatments.

Interventions

OTHERExercise

Supervised exercise program

BIOLOGICALPRP

Intra-articular PRP injections to knee joint

Sponsors

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 40-70 years of age, * Grade 2-3 according to Kellgren Lawrence osteoarthritis classification, * No medication for knee osteoarthritis in the past three months, * Subjects who understand and sign the consent form for this study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have received an invasive procedure, intra-articular application and / or physiotherapy in the target knee within three months, * Previous partial or total knee replacement of the target knee, * Body mass index \> 30 kg/m2, * Having any cardiovascular diseases, neurological disorders, rheumatic diseases, malignancy or psychiatric diseases, * Impaired cognition that impacts the ability to give informed consent, * Participation in another clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity6th weekPain intensity will be measured using the numerical pain rating scale. Patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10 that fits best to their pain intensity. Zero usually represents 'no pain at all' whereas the upper limit represents 'the worst pain ever possible'.
Function6th weekFunctional status of the patients will be evaluated by The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) Index. It is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 24 items divided into 3 subscales (Pain, Stiffness and Physical Function). The test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4, which correspond to: None (0), Mild (1), Moderate (2), Severe (3), and Extreme (4). Higher scores on the WOMAC indicate worse results.
Functional performance - 40m fast-paced walk test6th weekFunctional performance of the patients will be evaluated by 40-meter fast-paced walk test. Participants are asked to walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a 10-meter walkway for a total distance of 40 meters. Walking speed will be measured in meters/second (m/s).
Functional performance - 10-step stair-climb test6th weekFunctional performance of the patients will be evaluated by 10-step stair-climb test. Patients are instructed to ascend and descend the flight of stairs as quickly as possible but in a safe manner. The time needed is recorded in seconds.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of motion6th weekKnee joint ROMs will be measured using a universal goniometer. The process will be repeated three times and the average value will be recorded.
Health related quality of life6th weekHealth related quality of life will be measured using SF 12 score that measures eight health domains to assess physical and mental health.
Patient Satisfaction6th weekPatient satisfaction will be assessed by the Global Rating of Change scale.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026