Skip to content

Adipocytokines in Endometrial Cancer

Adipocytokines and Their Relationship to Obesity and Endometrial Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04697264
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-01-06
Start date
2021-04-12
Completion date
2023-10-31
Last updated
2025-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Cancer, Obesity

Keywords

Endometrial cancer, Obesity, Adiponectin, Leptin, TNF α, IL-6, IGF 1, IGF 2

Brief summary

The number of women diagnosed with uterine cancer continues to rise each year. Since the early 1990s, there has been almost 55% rise in the United Kingdom (UK). 34% of endometrial cancer can be attributed to obesity. In the obese state, the function of adipose tissue deteriorates resulting in a state of chronic inflammation. Adipocytokine-related signalling pathways promote cancer development by causing inflammation, cell proliferation, DNA damage and by inhibiting apoptosis. The investigators postulate that adipocytokines levels are significantly different in uterine cancer patients of different weight categories and different grade/stage/ type of tumour. Any woman attending the hospital with endometrial cancer and receiving treatment here will be invited to participate in the study. Consent will be sought to obtain 30mls (2 1/2 tablespoons) of venous blood at the time of surgery, on day 1 post-surgery and 3/6 months post-surgery during routine follow-up to check biomarker (adiponectin, leptin, tumour necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, Insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2) levels to see if the markers can be used to assess response to treatment. The investigators will also get consent to collect tissue - adipose tissue (after surgery) and uterine cancer tissue and lymph nodes (after histo-pathological evaluation) to assess for biomarkers. The investigators will also obtain blood samples from patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial. All tissues procured will be anonymised and analysed at the oncology laboratory, Leggett building, University of Surrey and later correlated with patients' medical data as well as with tumour grade, stage and type. The investigators will also use archival tissue blocks stored at the same laboratory for analysis (previously consented for use in research). These are anonymised tissue and there is no link to patients' data. The aim would be to ultimately find immuno-stimulatory/ suppressive biomarkers in order to develop novel diagnostic/ prognostic tools.

Detailed description

1. BACKGROUND Endometrial cancer is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract. It is the fourth most common cancer in the UK with around 9,500 new cases in 2017, current lifetime risk being 1 in 36 women. The number of women diagnosed with endometrial cancer continues to rise each year. Since the early 1990s, uterine cancer incidence rates have increased by almost three-fifths (55%) in the UK (2015-2017). The association between endometrial cancer and obesity is well documented. 7.5% of all cancers in women in UK are attributable to being overweight / obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2). For endometrial cancer, this risk rises to 34%. A review of meta-analyses showed endometrial cancer risk is 16% higher per 5 kg- gained during adulthood, 29% higher per 10cm increase in hip circumference and 27% higher per 10cm increase in waist circumference. This higher endometrial cancer risk with raised BMI is present in both pre- and post-menopausal women. Moreover, patients who are obese tend to have a poorer outcome with more co-morbidities than their non-obese counterparts. In the overweight and obese state, the function of the adipose tissue deteriorates resulting in a state of chronic inflammation. In this inflammatory state, adipocytes and macrophages secrete several molecules, adipokines and inflammatory cytokines, which may promote tumour development and angiogenesis and stimulate adhesions and migration of cells. Most implicated adipocytokines in the tumorigenesis pathway are adiponectin, leptin, tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Insulin-like growth factor 1 and 2 (IGF 1 and 2). Adipocytokine related signalling pathways are important in the development of an inflammatory microenvironment for tumours. This process is thought to increase the risk of endometrial cancer by inducing cell proliferation and preventing cell apoptosis. Adiponectin, the most abundant adipokine, has been suggested to have anti-angiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic properties. Raised leptin levels in obese state promotes inflammation by stimulating the production of IL-6, TNFα as well as IL-1 and IL-126. Leptin and adiponectin secretion are counter-regulated in vivo. A study by Luhn et. al. has shown adiponectin to have inverse relationship with the risk of endometrial cancer and leptin to have a direct correlation. Also, in an inflammatory environment, macrophages secrete potent proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6, which are known to activate numerous transcription factors that regulate the expression of genes involved in immune responses, anti-apoptosis, angiogenesis, and metastasis. The mechanisms of tumorigenesis are thought to be involved are free-radical production that cause DNA damage and impaired DNA repair. Research have further suggested that systemic levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) is dysregulated in obesity either due to increased IGF production or by down-regulation of IGF binding protein (IGFBP) production. IGF 1 is a growth and proliferation promotor and has inhibitory effects on cell death and is a major contributor in many neoplastic transformations. The above biomarkers are physiologically interrelated and are likely to reflect a more restricted number of underlying biological pathways. Possibly, they work in a synergistic capacity to modulate the risk of developing endometrial cancer. If specific patterns of cytokine expression were found to be predictive of adverse outcome, then the specific receptors may be targeted as a therapeutic option for endometrial cancer11. No study so far has looked at all these markers together in the serum and tissue samples of the same endometrial cancer patients to give a more wholesome idea about their effect on tumour genesis, progression and outcome. Therefore, this study is designed to assess the prognostic significance of these six biomarkers in the blood and tissue of endometrial cancer patients and co-relating the levels with their BMI and tumour type, after adjusting for age, parity, smoking status, menopausal status, use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT)/ hormonal contraception, and prevalence of diabetes and hypertension. 2. RATIONALE Development of novel biomarkers for a variety of uses including diagnosis, treatment monitoring and prognostication is on the Cancer Reform Strategy agenda and actively encouraged by the National Cancer Research Institute and Medical Research Council. Understanding how adipocytokines influence endometrial cancer risk may help to elucidate biological mechanisms important for the observed obesity-endometrial cancer association. 3. THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK As the incidence of endometrial cancer continues to rise there is a health need for a better diagnostic and prognostic approach. Studying the different biomarker levels in blood and cancer tissue will enable us to look for new targets that may be useful in the treatment and prognostication of this cancer. Also, if the levels of these markers change significantly post-treatment, the investigators can investigate if it will be possible to use these markers to assess response to treatment as follow-up for risk of recurrence forms an important part of the treatment protocol. 4. RESEARCH QUESTIONS / OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between the endometrial cancer and blood and tissue biomarkers in patients referred for endometrial cancer management to Royal Surrey NHS Foundation trust and to correlate with obesity and tumour characteristics. 5. STUDY DESIGN and METHODS of DATA COLLECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS 5.1. Study design All patients being referred to the Royal Surrey NHS Foundation trust with diagnosed uterine cancer will be given the research information leaflet. Initially, an invitation letter will be sent alongside the patients' clinic appointment letter to inform them of the study and give them time for preliminary consideration of the study. Patients will then be approached in the outpatients' clinics after the initial consultation by the clinician. They will be given a participant information leaflet detailing the study rationale, methodology and analysis. Patients who agree to participate in the study will be asked to sign a consent form after explanation. Demographic data will be collected at the same time to correlate various risk factors associated with the development of uterine cancer. This data will be collected by: * A short patient interview (10 minutes) * Patients' medical notes Data from the interview will be directly entered into an existing departmental database for Gynaecological oncology which is password protected and stored on NHS computers. A copy of the data proformas from the interview will be filed in a secure room within the University department to allow for source data verification. Participants will then have 30mls (2 ½ tablespoons) of venous blood taken on the day of the surgery. Tissue samples from the participants undergoing hysterectomy will be collected as follows: the PI will collect any fresh tissue (adipose tissue) directly from theatre before fixing as it is not needed for establishing diagnosis and the uterine cancer tissue and lymph node will be collected by the PI after histo-pathological examination from the histo-pathology department after the diagnosis is established. All tissue processing will adhere to Human Tissue Authority (HTA) guidelines and will be performed at the Oncology laboratory at Leggett building at University of Surrey. The participants will have a repeat blood test (30mls) on day 1 post-surgery and at their 3 or 6 months routine post-surgery follow up appointment. For those participants who are recommended chemotherapy, the investigators will also ask consent to collect demographic data at the time of consultation and baseline blood sample (30mls venous blood) before commencing chemotherapy and after 3rd and 6th chemotherapy cycles to assess any changes in the biomarkers that may correlate with progression or regression of disease. The investigators will also obtain archival tissue blocks (of uterine cancer patients consented from a previous study for use during an appropriate ethics committee approved research) to help increase the number of recruitments for this study. Their demographic data with identification log will be made available to the PI only to assess for correlation between their data and the tissue diagnosis during analysis. 5.2. Sample analysis ELISA will be used to assay bio-marker levels in blood samples. For tissue analysis the investigators will set up a tissue microarray (TMA). This will allow more uniform staining of the sample for immunohistochemistry with no inter-specimen variation of the staining method. Each case will be reviewed, and the area of interest (tumour) will be marked on the slide and cores from the areas of interest will be used to create the microarray block. Sections can then be cut from the microarray block and slides prepared for immune staining. The advantage of using this method is that the samples are subjected to the same conditions while being stained and the same part of a tumour can be reliably stained for several markers. Tissue sections from the TMA will be used for immune-staining and the expression of the markers of interest will be scored. Clinical data which is available on the cases will then be correlated with the histological and immunohistochemical scores and statistical analysis will be carried out. 5.3. Data analysis Standard statistical analytical tools will be used to analyse the data. Relation between different variables will be sought with odds ratio, confidence interval and significance with P value (\<0.05 significant). The Mann-Whitney U test will be used to assess differential expression of immune markers between tissue types -blood and tumour tissue. Correlation with clinical characteristics will be determined using univariate log-rank and multivariable Cox proportional hazards adjusting for age, stage, grade and histology. 6. SAMPLE AND RECRUITMENT Potential participants will be identified in the Royal Surrey NHS Foundation trust - either seen here or referred here and receiving her treatment here for diagnosed endometrial cancer. 6.1. Sample size The investigators will aim to recruit 30-60 patients with diagnosed endometrial cancer in the study. This sample size will also include archived tissue sample (formerly consented and stored in Leggett building, University of Surrey, for use in future ethical research). 6.2. Recruitment All patients seen or referred with endometrial cancer at the Royal Surrey Oncology Department will be invited to participate in the study. Patients will not receive any payments for participation in the study. The investigators aim to obtain all information and samples at the time of routine visits. 6.2.1. Sample identification Patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer will be identified through the Gynaecological Oncology Multi-Disciplinary Team meeting or by the Gynaecological Oncology or Medical Oncology teams. 6.2.2. Consent Written consent will be obtained after the patient has received the participant information leaflet and had the opportunity to discuss and ask questions about the study. Enough time will be given for the purpose. Patients must all have capacity to consent. Consent will be undertaken by clinicians on the Gynaecological Oncology team. If necessary, a translator or language line can be used. Consent will also be taken for use of samples (anonymised and stored in Leggett building, University of Surrey following all regulations by HTA) for use in future research.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTBlood and tissue sample collection from patients

Blood and tissue sample (endometrial and adipose tissue) collection from endometrial cancer patients. Blood from all control patients, endometrial sample from benign patients having surgery for benign gynaecological conditions.

Sponsors

Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
GRACE Group
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Surrey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Women diagnosed with endometrial cancer 2. Age 18 or above 3. Of sound mind so they can give informed consent 4. Historical tissue sample/ blocks from previous cases in the laboratory in the University of Surrey, also be used if appropriate consent is in place.

Exclusion criteria

1. Under 18yrs age 2. Unable to give consent /denies consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Correlation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Data collected at baselineCorrelation between circulating levels of these markers and demographic characteristics such as age, parity, smoking status, menopausal status, medication use, use of HRT or hormonal contraception, the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension, any prior significant medical history or history of cancer and family history of cancer.
Correlation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.Data collected at baseline (day 0)Data on endometrial cancer histological characteristics, including grade, stage, histology, LVSI, MELF and MSI were collected from histology reports. Endometrial cancer grade is based on glandular organisation: Grade 1 (\<5% non-glandular), Grade 2 (6-50%), and Grade 3 (\>50% non-glandular). Staging reflects cancer spread, from localised to distant involvement. Type 1 (70-80%) is estrogen-related cancer usually endometrioid histology, while Type 2 (10-20%) arises from atrophic endometrium, of non-endometrioid histology. A lower grade and stage and type 1 histology is associated with better prognosis. LVSI, cancer in lymphatic/vascular spaces of the myometrium, is an independent risk factor for recurrence. MELF (microcystic, elongated, fragmented myometrial invasion) correlates with larger tumours, deeper invasion, and LVSI. MSI indicates DNA mismatch repair defects and is linked to advanced histological features, such as deep invasion and high-grade endometrial cancers.
The Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Adiponectin Between Study and Control PatientsThe levels of the markers between the two groups of patients were compared at baseline (day 0) and presented here.Plasma levels of adiponectin will be measured by ELISA in both the study and the control populations, and the results compared using linear regression tests.
The Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Between Study and Control Patients.The levels of the markers between the two groups of patients were compared at baseline (day 0) and presented here.Plasma levels of leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 will be measured by ELISA in both the study and the control populations, and the results compared using linear regression tests.
The Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of IL6 and TNFα Between Study and Control Patients.The levels of the markers between the two groups of patients were compared at baseline (day 0) and presented here.Plasma levels of IL6 and TNFα will be measured by ELISA in both the study and the control populations, and the results compared using linear regression tests.
Correlation Between the Markers and Study Patients' Obesity StatusLevels of the markers were compared with BMI of the study patients at baseline i.e. Day 0Correlation between the markers and patients' obesity status using WHO BMI subgroups.
Correlation Between the Markers and Control Patients' Obesity StatusBMI was measured at baseline only for the control population.Correlation between the markers and patients' obesity status using WHO BMI subgroups.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Adiponectin Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).6 monthsLevels of biomarkers were assessed at baseline, at day 1, and at 6 months post-surgery in endometrial cancer patients (study population). To assess the effect of treatment i.e. surgery +/- adjuvant treatment on the levels of the biomarkers, associations were sought between the levels of biomarkers before surgery (day 0) and 6 months post-surgery and the results have been presented here.
Correlation Between Circulating IL6 and TNF Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.At baseline, one time point measurement, Day 0Correlation between circulating IL6 and TNF levels (measured by ELISA) and their expression in endometrial tissue (measured by PCR). This was done for the 39 patients from whom we received the tissue sample.
Changes in Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).6 monthsLevels of biomarkers were assessed at baseline, at day 1, and at 6 months post-surgery in endometrial cancer patients (study population). To assess the effect of treatment i.e. surgery +/- adjuvant treatment on the levels of the biomarkers, associations were sought between the levels of biomarkers before surgery (day 0) and 6 months post-surgery and the results have been presented here.
Changes in IL6 and TNFα Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).6 monthsLevels of biomarkers were assessed at baseline, at day 1, and at 6 months post-surgery in endometrial cancer patients (study population). To assess the effect of treatment i.e. surgery +/- adjuvant treatment on the levels of the biomarkers, associations were sought between the levels of biomarkers before surgery (day 0) and 6 months post-surgery and the results have been presented here.
Expression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueThe expression of these markers were investigated in the two tissue samples at baseline only (day 0).Expression of adiponectin, leptin, and their receptors were studied in endometrial cancer tissue and fat tissue using qRT-PCR. Fresh endometrial tissue was collected from 39 endometrial cancer and 5 control patients. Fresh adipose tissue was collected from these 39 endometrial cancer patients. Normal endometrium was used as a reference (calibrator sample) and the expressions of the biomarkers were calculated as fold changes compared to the expression in the calibrator sample using the delta-delta Ct formula. A higher fold change indicates greater expression of the marker in the study sample compared to the benign calibrator sample. This allowed for a standardised comparison of biomarker expression across different tissues, such as cancerous and adipose tissues.
Expression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueThe expression of these markers were investigated in the two tissue samples at baseline only (day 0).The expression of adiponectin and leptin and their receptors were studied in endometrial cancer tissue and lymph node tissue using qRT-PCR. 12 FFPE lymph nodal tissue blocks were collected from patients with lymph node dissection. Fresh endometrial tissue was collected from 39 endometrial cancer and 5 control patients, however, the data for the 12 patients with lymph node dissection is presented here. Normal endometrium was used as a reference (calibrator sample) and the expressions of the biomarkers were calculated as fold changes compared to the expression in the calibrator sample using the delta-delta Ct formula. A higher fold change indicates greater expression of the marker in the study sample compared to the benign calibrator sample. This allowed for a standardised comparison of biomarker expression across different tissues, such as cancerous and lymph nodal tissue.
Correlation Between Circulating Adiponectin Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.At baseline, one time point measurement, Day 0Correlation between circulating adiponectin levels (measured by ELISA) and their expression in endometrial tissue (measured by PCR). This was done for the 39 patients from whom we received the tissue sample.
Correlation Between Circulating Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.At baseline, one time point measurement, Day 0Correlation between circulating leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 levels (measured by ELISA) and their expression in endometrial tissue (measured by PCR). This was done for the 39 patients from whom we received the tissue sample.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Study - Patients With Endometrial Cancer
Potential participants will be identified in the Royal Surrey NHS Foundation trust - either seen here or referred here and receiving her treatment here for diagnosed endometrial cancer. Patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer will be identified through the Gynaecological Oncology Multi-Disciplinary Team meeting or by the Gynaecological Oncology or Medical Oncology teams. Blood sample will be collected on the day of the surgery when they are in the theatres and then repeated on day 1 post-operative in gynaecology ward and at 3/6 months post-surgery follow-up in clinic. Endometrial and adipose tissue collection at the time of surgery.
50
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological Issues
Female patients being referred to Royal Surrey NHS foundation Trust for benign conditions (specifically not endometrial cancer) will be invited to participate as the control population. Blood from all control patients, endometrial sample from benign patients having surgery for benign gynaecological conditions.
50
Total100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStudy - Patients With Endometrial CancerControl - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesTotal
Age, Continuous65.7 years66.1 years65.9 years
Basal Metabolic Index (BMI)32.1 kg/m226.6 kg/m229.35 kg/m2
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
3 Ethnicities
Afro-caribbean
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
3 Ethnicities
Asian
6 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
3 Ethnicities
Caucasian
43 Participants48 Participants91 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
50 participants50 participants100 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
All participants were female
50 Female participants50 Female participants100 Female participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Correlation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.

Correlation between circulating levels of these markers and demographic characteristics such as age, parity, smoking status, menopausal status, medication use, use of HRT or hormonal contraception, the prevalence of diabetes and hypertension, any prior significant medical history or history of cancer and family history of cancer.

Time frame: Data collected at baseline

Population: HRT usage counted among menopausal women only.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.MenopauseNo11 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.HypertensionNo28 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.HRT among menopausal womenNo29 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Past history of cancerYes6 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.SmokingNo35 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.MenopauseYes39 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Hormonal contraceptionYes30 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.DiabetesYes13 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Hormonal contraceptionNo20 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.SmokingYes15 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Past history of cancerNo44 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.DiabetesNo37 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Family history of cancerYes22 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.HRT among menopausal womenYes10 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Family history of cancerNo28 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.HypertensionYes22 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Family history of cancerNo22 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.MenopauseNo8 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.SmokingYes17 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.SmokingNo33 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.HRT among menopausal womenYes20 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.HRT among menopausal womenNo22 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.DiabetesYes3 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.DiabetesNo47 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.HypertensionYes20 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.HypertensionNo30 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Past history of cancerYes14 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Hormonal contraceptionYes32 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Hormonal contraceptionNo18 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Past history of cancerNo36 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.Family history of cancerYes28 Participants
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers and Demographic Characteristics.MenopauseYes42 Participants
Comparison: The influence of age on adiponectin levels was analysed by dividing the population into binary groups (\<60 years and \>/= 60 years) to facilitate comparison.p-value: 0.026Regression, Linear
Comparison: The influence of age on adiponectin levels was analysed by dividing the population into binary groups (\<60years and \>/=60years) to facilitate comparison.p-value: 0.496Regression, Linear
Comparison: The influence of age on leptin levels was analysed by dividing the population into binary groups (\<60years and \>/=60years) to facilitate comparison.p-value: >0.05Regression, Linear
Comparison: The influence of age on IGF1 and 2 levels were analysed by dividing the population into binary groups (\<60years and \>/=60years) to facilitate comparison.p-value: >0.05Regression, Linear
Comparison: The influence of age on IGF1 and 2 levels were analysed by dividing the population into binary groups (\<60years and \>/=60years) to facilitate comparison.p-value: >0.05Regression, Linear
Comparison: The influence of menopausal status on levels of adiponectin, leptin, IGF1 and 2 were analysed by dividing the population into binary groups (pre-menopausal and menopausal) to facilitate comparison.p-value: >0.05Regression, Linear
Comparison: The influence of menopausal status on levels of adiponectin was analysed by dividing the population into binary groups (pre-menopausal and menopausal) to facilitate comparison.p-value: 0.014Regression, Linear
Comparison: The influence of menopausal status on levels of leptin was analysed by dividing the population into binary groups (pre-menopausal and menopausal) to facilitate comparison.p-value: 0.006Regression, Linear
Comparison: The influence of menopausal status on levels of IGF1 and IGF2 were analysed by dividing the population into binary groups (pre-menopausal and menopausal) to facilitate comparison.p-value: 0.019Regression, Linear
Primary

Correlation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.

Data on endometrial cancer histological characteristics, including grade, stage, histology, LVSI, MELF and MSI were collected from histology reports. Endometrial cancer grade is based on glandular organisation: Grade 1 (\<5% non-glandular), Grade 2 (6-50%), and Grade 3 (\>50% non-glandular). Staging reflects cancer spread, from localised to distant involvement. Type 1 (70-80%) is estrogen-related cancer usually endometrioid histology, while Type 2 (10-20%) arises from atrophic endometrium, of non-endometrioid histology. A lower grade and stage and type 1 histology is associated with better prognosis. LVSI, cancer in lymphatic/vascular spaces of the myometrium, is an independent risk factor for recurrence. MELF (microcystic, elongated, fragmented myometrial invasion) correlates with larger tumours, deeper invasion, and LVSI. MSI indicates DNA mismatch repair defects and is linked to advanced histological features, such as deep invasion and high-grade endometrial cancers.

Time frame: Data collected at baseline (day 0)

Population: Study population - patients with endometrial cancer

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.Grade 213 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.Grade 314 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.Stage Ia+Ib41 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.Stage II+III9 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.Type1 histology36 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.Type 2 histology14 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.LVSI present15 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.LVSI absent35 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.MELF present6 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.MELF absent29 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.MSI present10 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.Grade 123 Participants
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Levels of These Markers (Day 0) and Cancer Characteristics in the Study Population, Using Linear Regresion.MSI absent32 Participants
Comparison: Effects of LVSI on adiponectin levels were assessed using multivariate linear regression, with binary categorisations (presence and absence of LVSI) to facilitate comparisons.p-value: 0.033Regression, Linear
Comparison: Effects of MELF on TNF levels were assessed using multivariate linear regression, with binary categorisations (presence and absence of MELF) to facilitate comparisons.p-value: 0.015Regression, Linear
Comparison: Effects of tumour grade (Grade 1/2), stage (Stage 1/ \>/=1), histology (type 1 and type 2), and MSI (presence or absence) on the biomarker levels (adiponectin, leptin, IGF 1 and 2, IL6 and TNF) were assessed using multivariate linear regression, with binary categorisations to facilitate comparisons.p-value: >0.05Regression, Linear
Primary

Correlation Between the Markers and Control Patients' Obesity Status

Correlation between the markers and patients' obesity status using WHO BMI subgroups.

Time frame: BMI was measured at baseline only for the control population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between the Markers and Control Patients' Obesity Status26.6 kg/m2
Comparison: The impact of BMI on biomarker levels was assessed by categorising the population into two groups-normal weight and overweight/obese-for straightforward comparison.~Here, we present the associations between adiponectin and the BMI of the control population at baseline.p-value: 0.004Regression, Linear
Comparison: The impact of BMI on biomarker levels was assessed by categorising the population into two groups-normal weight and overweight/obese-for straightforward comparison.~Here, we present the associations between leptin and the BMI of the control population at baseline.p-value: 0.0002Regression, Linear
Comparison: The impact of BMI on biomarker levels was assessed by categorising the population into two groups-normal weight and overweight/obese-for straightforward comparison.~Here, we present the associations between IL6, TNFα, IGF1, and IGF2 and the BMI of the control population at baseline.p-value: >0.05Regression, Linear
Primary

Correlation Between the Markers and Study Patients' Obesity Status

Correlation between the markers and patients' obesity status using WHO BMI subgroups.

Time frame: Levels of the markers were compared with BMI of the study patients at baseline i.e. Day 0

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between the Markers and Study Patients' Obesity Status32.1 kg/m2
Comparison: The impact of BMI on biomarker levels was assessed by categorising the population into two groups-normal weight and overweight/obese-for straightforward comparison.~Here, we present the associations between adiponectin and the BMI of the study population at baseline.p-value: >0.05Regression, Linear
Comparison: The impact of BMI on biomarker levels was assessed by categorising the population into two groups-normal weight and overweight/obese-for straightforward comparison.~Here, we present the associations between leptin and the BMI of the study population at baseline.p-value: 0.09Regression, Linear
Comparison: The impact of BMI on biomarker levels was assessed by categorising the population into two groups-normal weight and overweight/obese-for straightforward comparison.~Here, we present the association between IL6, TNFα, IGF1, and IGF2 and the BMI of the study population at baseline.p-value: >0.05Regression, Linear
Primary

The Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Adiponectin Between Study and Control Patients

Plasma levels of adiponectin will be measured by ELISA in both the study and the control populations, and the results compared using linear regression tests.

Time frame: The levels of the markers between the two groups of patients were compared at baseline (day 0) and presented here.

Population: Only baseline (D0/prior to surgery) levels of the markers have been listed below for comparison of baseline levels in cancer and control populations

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Adiponectin Between Study and Control Patients5.9 μg/mL
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Adiponectin Between Study and Control Patients11 μg/mL
Comparison: To compare biomarker levels between study and control populations, a linear regression model was used, adjusting for BMI, diabetes, and parity, which are the unmatched factors between the study and control groups. This adjustment aimed to mitigate the confounding impact of these factors, considering their individual influence on the risk of endometrial cancer.p-value: <0.0001Regression, Linear
Primary

The Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of IL6 and TNFα Between Study and Control Patients.

Plasma levels of IL6 and TNFα will be measured by ELISA in both the study and the control populations, and the results compared using linear regression tests.

Time frame: The levels of the markers between the two groups of patients were compared at baseline (day 0) and presented here.

Population: Only baseline (D0/prior to surgery) levels of the markers have been listed below for comparison of baseline levels in cancer and control populations

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of IL6 and TNFα Between Study and Control Patients.IL617.3 pg/mL
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of IL6 and TNFα Between Study and Control Patients.TNF118.8 pg/mL
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of IL6 and TNFα Between Study and Control Patients.IL619.3 pg/mL
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of IL6 and TNFα Between Study and Control Patients.TNF418.8 pg/mL
Comparison: To compare biomarker levels between study and control populations, a linear regression model was used, adjusting for BMI, diabetes, and parity, which are the unmatched factors between the study and control groups. This adjustment aimed to mitigate the confounding impact of these factors, considering their individual influence on the risk of endometrial cancer.p-value: <0.05Regression, Linear
Primary

The Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Between Study and Control Patients.

Plasma levels of leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 will be measured by ELISA in both the study and the control populations, and the results compared using linear regression tests.

Time frame: The levels of the markers between the two groups of patients were compared at baseline (day 0) and presented here.

Population: Only baseline (D0/prior to surgery) levels of the markers have been listed below for comparison of baseline levels in cancer and control populations

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Between Study and Control Patients.Leptin61.2 ng/mL
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Between Study and Control Patients.IGF15.8 ng/mL
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Between Study and Control Patients.IGF217.3 ng/mL
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Between Study and Control Patients.Leptin41.9 ng/mL
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Between Study and Control Patients.IGF17.8 ng/mL
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesThe Difference in Circulating Plasma Levels of Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Between Study and Control Patients.IGF219.3 ng/mL
Comparison: To compare biomarker levels between study and control populations, a linear regression model was used, adjusting for BMI, diabetes, and parity, which are the unmatched factors between the study and control groups. This adjustment aimed to mitigate the confounding impact of these factors, considering their individual influence on the risk of endometrial cancer.p-value: >0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Changes in Adiponectin Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).

Levels of biomarkers were assessed at baseline, at day 1, and at 6 months post-surgery in endometrial cancer patients (study population). To assess the effect of treatment i.e. surgery +/- adjuvant treatment on the levels of the biomarkers, associations were sought between the levels of biomarkers before surgery (day 0) and 6 months post-surgery and the results have been presented here.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerChanges in Adiponectin Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).2.59 μg/mLStandard Error 0.086
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesChanges in Adiponectin Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).2.26 μg/mLStandard Error 0.085
p-value: 0.0007Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Changes in IL6 and TNFα Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).

Levels of biomarkers were assessed at baseline, at day 1, and at 6 months post-surgery in endometrial cancer patients (study population). To assess the effect of treatment i.e. surgery +/- adjuvant treatment on the levels of the biomarkers, associations were sought between the levels of biomarkers before surgery (day 0) and 6 months post-surgery and the results have been presented here.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerChanges in IL6 and TNFα Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).IL62.84 pg/mLStandard Error 0.419
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerChanges in IL6 and TNFα Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).TNF3.70 pg/mLStandard Error 0.413
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesChanges in IL6 and TNFα Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).IL63.01 pg/mLStandard Error 0.415
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesChanges in IL6 and TNFα Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).TNF3.62 pg/mLStandard Error 0.409
Secondary

Changes in Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).

Levels of biomarkers were assessed at baseline, at day 1, and at 6 months post-surgery in endometrial cancer patients (study population). To assess the effect of treatment i.e. surgery +/- adjuvant treatment on the levels of the biomarkers, associations were sought between the levels of biomarkers before surgery (day 0) and 6 months post-surgery and the results have been presented here.

Time frame: 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerChanges in Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).Leptin5.42 ng/mLStandard Error 0.117
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerChanges in Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).IGF12.59 ng/mLStandard Error 0.113
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerChanges in Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).IGF23.93 ng/mLStandard Error 0.133
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesChanges in Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).Leptin5.51 ng/mLStandard Error 0.115
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesChanges in Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).IGF12.94 ng/mLStandard Error 0.112
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesChanges in Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels Before (Day 0) and After Surgery in the Study Population (at 6 Months).IGF24.85 ng/mLStandard Error 0.132
Comparison: Leptin levels were compared between the day 0 and 6 months post-operative bloods.p-value: >0.05Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: IGF1 levels were compared between the day 0 and 6 months post-operative bloods.p-value: 0.004Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: IGF2 levels were compared between the day 0 and 6 months post-operative bloods.p-value: <0.0001Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Correlation Between Circulating Adiponectin Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.

Correlation between circulating adiponectin levels (measured by ELISA) and their expression in endometrial tissue (measured by PCR). This was done for the 39 patients from whom we received the tissue sample.

Time frame: At baseline, one time point measurement, Day 0

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Adiponectin Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.5.76 μg/ml
Comparison: Circulating adiponectin levels and the expression of these markers and their receptors in endometrial tissue were compared using correlation studies.p-value: >0.05Pearson's correlation test
Secondary

Correlation Between Circulating IL6 and TNF Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.

Correlation between circulating IL6 and TNF levels (measured by ELISA) and their expression in endometrial tissue (measured by PCR). This was done for the 39 patients from whom we received the tissue sample.

Time frame: At baseline, one time point measurement, Day 0

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating IL6 and TNF Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.IL631.71 pg/mL
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating IL6 and TNF Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.TNF57.13 pg/mL
Comparison: Circulating IL6 and TNF levels and the expression of these markers and their receptors in endometrial tissue were compared using Pearson's correlation studies.p-value: >0.05Pearson's correlation test
Secondary

Correlation Between Circulating Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.

Correlation between circulating leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 levels (measured by ELISA) and their expression in endometrial tissue (measured by PCR). This was done for the 39 patients from whom we received the tissue sample.

Time frame: At baseline, one time point measurement, Day 0

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.IGF216.35 ng/mL
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.Leptin57.99 ng/mL
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerCorrelation Between Circulating Leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 Levels and Their Expression in Endometrial Tissue.IGF15.73 ng/mL
Comparison: Circulating leptin, IGF1 and IGF2 levels and the expression of these markers and their receptors in endometrial tissue were compared using Pearson's correlation studies.p-value: >0.05Pearson's correlation test
Secondary

Expression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose Tissue

Expression of adiponectin, leptin, and their receptors were studied in endometrial cancer tissue and fat tissue using qRT-PCR. Fresh endometrial tissue was collected from 39 endometrial cancer and 5 control patients. Fresh adipose tissue was collected from these 39 endometrial cancer patients. Normal endometrium was used as a reference (calibrator sample) and the expressions of the biomarkers were calculated as fold changes compared to the expression in the calibrator sample using the delta-delta Ct formula. A higher fold change indicates greater expression of the marker in the study sample compared to the benign calibrator sample. This allowed for a standardised comparison of biomarker expression across different tissues, such as cancerous and adipose tissues.

Time frame: The expression of these markers were investigated in the two tissue samples at baseline only (day 0).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueLeptin receptor/ ObR0.328 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueAdipoQ receptor / ADIPOR13.15 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueAdipoQ receptor/ ADIPOR21.689 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueLeptin / Ob263.7 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueAdiponectin / AdipoQ116.6 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueAdipoQ receptor/ ADIPOR21.741 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueAdiponectin / AdipoQ10165.2 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueLeptin / Ob3765.1 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueAdipoQ receptor / ADIPOR10.839 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Adipose TissueLeptin receptor/ ObR1.432 fold change
Comparison: Expression of adiponectin was studied in endometrial cancer tissue and fat tissue using qRT-PCR.p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Expression of leptin and their receptors were studied in endometrial cancer tissue and fat tissue using qRT-PCR.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Expression of adiponectin receptors were studied in endometrial cancer tissue and fat tissue using qRT-PCR.p-value: >0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Expression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal Tissue

The expression of adiponectin and leptin and their receptors were studied in endometrial cancer tissue and lymph node tissue using qRT-PCR. 12 FFPE lymph nodal tissue blocks were collected from patients with lymph node dissection. Fresh endometrial tissue was collected from 39 endometrial cancer and 5 control patients, however, the data for the 12 patients with lymph node dissection is presented here. Normal endometrium was used as a reference (calibrator sample) and the expressions of the biomarkers were calculated as fold changes compared to the expression in the calibrator sample using the delta-delta Ct formula. A higher fold change indicates greater expression of the marker in the study sample compared to the benign calibrator sample. This allowed for a standardised comparison of biomarker expression across different tissues, such as cancerous and lymph nodal tissue.

Time frame: The expression of these markers were investigated in the two tissue samples at baseline only (day 0).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueAdiponectin / AdipoQ19.18 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueADIPOR10.69 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueADIPOR21.35 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueLeptin receptor/ ObR0.15 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIGF11.42 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIGF1R1.15 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIGF2R1.67 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueTNF12.25 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueTNFR1A4.80 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIL6R4.56 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueTNFR1B6.11 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueLeptin / Ob97.57 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIGF28.20 fold change
Study - Patients With Endometrial CancerExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIL6461.5 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIL64100.21 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueAdiponectin / AdipoQ653.235 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIL6R1238.38 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueADIPOR11.37 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueLeptin / Ob11448.21 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueADIPOR210.10 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueTNF23.46 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueLeptin receptor/ ObR3.47 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueTNFR1B11.5525 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIGF14.5125 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIGF25.33 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIGF1R7.49 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueTNFR1A144.9691667 fold change
Control - Patients Without Endometrial Cancer, With Benign Gynaecological IssuesExpression of These Biomarkers and Their Receptors in Endometrial Cancer Tissue and Lymph Nodal TissueIGF2R0.73 fold change
Comparison: Expression of adiponectin was studied in endometrial cancer tissue and lymph node tissue using qRT-PCR.p-value: 0.0002t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Expression of leptin was studied in endometrial cancer tissue and lymphnode tissue using qRT-PCR.p-value: 0.011t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The expression of IL6 receptor (IL6R) was studied in endometrial cancer tissue and lymphnode tissue using qRT-PCR.p-value: 0.009t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: The expression of adiponectin receptor, leptin receptor, IGF1 and IGF 2 receptors, IL6, TNF, IGF1 and IGF2 were studied in endometrial cancer tissue and lymphnode tissue using qRT-PCR.p-value: >0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026