Skip to content

Feasibility of a Goal-based Agenda Setting Intervention

Feasibility of a Goal-based Agenda Setting Intervention for Informing Conversations in Adult Cystic Fibrosis Care

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04696484
Enrollment
219
Registered
2021-01-06
Start date
2021-01-14
Completion date
2021-09-19
Last updated
2021-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Disease, Cystic Fibrosis

Brief summary

This study aims to assess the feasibility of a new, brief intervention, the 'coopeRATE Prompt', for informing conversations between patients and physicians in routine tele-health and in-person adult Cystic Fibrosis (CF) care. The coopeRATE Prompt is two questions designed to elicit patients' concerns and goals to facilitate collaborative goal setting within the health care visit. This is a prospective single arm study that will be conducted at four CF care centers in the United States.

Detailed description

Participating patients will be asked to complete two online surveys. The first survey, which includes the coopeRATE Prompt intervention questions, is completed 1-4 days before their upcoming healthcare visit. After completing this survey and before their visit, patients' intervention responses are shared with their physician and, if requested, other members of their care team. The second patient survey is completed within 24 hours after their healthcare visit. Participating clinicians are asked to complete a single online survey within one month after completion of patient data collection.

Interventions

The coopeRATE Prompt intervention is a set of two questions delivered to patients before the clinical encounter that elicit their concerns and goals. The intervention is delivered to patients online, outside the clinic setting.

Sponsors

Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* have a diagnosis of CF * are 18 years of age or older * can read and write English * have a scheduled in-person or tele-health routine CF care visit * have access to internet and email

Exclusion criteria

* does not have a diagnosis of CF * is less than 18 years of age * cannot read and write English * does not have a scheduled in-person or tele-health routine CF care visit * does have access to internet and email

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Use of intervention responses with physician (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported discussion of intervention responses (concerns and goals) in the visit with physician, assessed using two items with multiple choice (single answer) format. The first item assesses how many of the patient concerns were discussed and the second item assesses how many of the patient goals were discussed. Item response options are 'None of them', 'Some of them', or 'All of them'.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction with intervention timing (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported satisfaction with timing of intervention delivery, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.
Way(s) in which intervention was helpful (clinician-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionClinician-reported way(s) in which intervention was helpful, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple answer) format.
Impact on time spent with patients (clinician-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionClinician-reported impact on amount of time spent with patients, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.
Reason(s) for not using intervention (never used) (clinician-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionClinician-reported reason(s) for never discussing intervention responses with patients, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple answer) format.
Reason(s) for not using intervention (sometimes used) (clinician-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionClinician-reported reason(s) for only sometimes discussing intervention responses with patients, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple answer) format.
Intervention acceptability (clinician-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionClinician-reported intervention acceptability, assessed using an adapted version of the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (Weiner et al., 2017). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ('Completely disagree') to 5 ('Completely agree'). A respondent's total score is the mean of all item responses.
Future use of intervention (clinician-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionClinician-reported preference for using the intervention with patients in the future, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.
Intervention completion (patient-reported)1-4 days before the healthcare visitPresence of a response to each of the coopeRATE Prompt intervention questions. The coopeRATE Prompt includes two items with open-text response format.
Intervention acceptability (patient-reported)1-4 days before the healthcare visitPatient-reported intervention acceptability, assessed using an adapted version of the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (Weiner et al., 2017). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 ('Completely disagree') to 5 ('Completely agree'). A respondent's total score is the mean of all item responses.
Utility of intervention (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported utility (helpfulness) of intervention, assessed using a single adapted item (Dalcin et al., 2015). The item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ('Not at all helpful') to 4 ('Extremely helpful').
Way(s) in which intervention was helpful (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported way(s) in which intervention was helpful, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple answer) format.
Initiator of discussion (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported initiator of discussion of intervention responses in the visit with physician, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.
Satisfaction with time spent (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported satisfaction with amount of time spent discussing intervention responses in the visit with physician, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.
Preference for sharing intervention responses with other team members (patient-reported)1-4 days before the healthcare visitPatient-reported preference for sharing intervention responses with other members of the care team, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple response) format.
Use of intervention responses with other team members (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported discussion of intervention responses in the visit with other members of the care team, assessed using two items. The first item assesses whether intervention responses were discussed, with a multiple choice (single answer) format. The second item assesses the specific team members with whom discussions were had, with a multiple choice (multiple answer) format.
Preferred intervention timing (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported preferred timing of intervention delivery, assessed using a single item with open-text response format.
Future receipt of intervention (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported preference for receiving the intervention again in the future, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.
Collaborative goal setting (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitA new 3-item patient-reported measure under evaluation to assess collaborative goal setting between a patient and physician during the health care visit. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ('Strongly disagree') to 3 ('Strongly agree'), with an additional 'Not sure' option. Scoring method is to be determined.
Shared decision-making (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported shared decision-making with physician during the health care visit, assessed using the 3-item collaboRATE measure (Elwyn et al., 2013; Barr et al., 2014). Each item is rated on a 10-point scale ranging from 0 ('No effort was made') to 9 ('Every effort was made'). Respondent's are assigned a score of 1 if every item is rated 'Every effort was made' and a score of 0 for all other response combinations.
Frequency of intervention receipt (clinician-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionClinician-reported frequency of receiving patient intervention responses, assessed using a single item with open-text response format.
Use of intervention responses with patients (clinician-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionClinician-reported frequency of use of intervention responses with patients in the visit, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.
Utility of intervention (clinician-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionClinician-reported utility (helpfulness) of intervention, assessed using a single adapted item (Dalcin et al., 2015). The item is rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 ('Not at all helpful') to 4 ('Extremely helpful').

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Type of routine healthcare visit (patient-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionPatient-reported type of routine CF care visit (e.g., in-person only, phone-only), assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.
People seen during the visit (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported people seen (e.g., doctor, nurse) during the healthcare visit, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (multiple answer) format.
History with people seen during the visit (patient-reported)Within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported history with people seen during the healthcare visit, assessed using a single item with multiple choice (single answer) format.
Additional intervention feedback (clinician-reported)Within 1 month following completion of patient data collectionClinician-reported additional intervention feedback, assessed using a single item with open-text response format.
Concerns and goals (patient-reported)1-4 days before the healthcare visit and within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported concerns and goals, assessed using the coopeRATE Prompt intervention. The coopeRATE Prompt includes two items with open-text response format. Item responses are assessed in terms of concern and goal frequency and type (categorizations to be determined).
Additional intervention feedback (patient-reported)1-4 days before the healthcare visit and within 24 hours after completion of the healthcare visitPatient-reported additional intervention feedback, assessed using two items with open-text response format. Additional feedback is first assessed immediately after completing the intervention questions and again after the index healthcare visit.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026