Skip to content

Sensory Integration Versus Fine Motor Intervention in Children With Autism

Therapeutic Outcomes of Sensory Integration Versus Fine Motor Intervention on Autistic Features and Fine Motor Skills in Children With Autism: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04696133
Enrollment
40
Registered
2021-01-06
Start date
2020-03-15
Completion date
2023-08-15
Last updated
2024-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Disorder, Quality of life, sensory integration, fine motor skills

Brief summary

Clinically, infants with Autism spectrum often display gross motor delays in supine, prone, and sitting skills in their first year of life.

Interventions

stretching and strengthening exercises in addition to exercises to enhance fine motor skills

* Tactile stimulation * Proprioceptive stimulation

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ranges from 8 to 12 years. * Mild to moderate autistic features

Exclusion criteria

• Significant visual or auditory defects.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gilliam autism rating scale3 monthshigher the autism index, indicate the probability the individual has autism

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bruininks-Oseretsky Test Of Motor Proficiency3 monthsFine manual control domain will be assessed in the current study. Gender specific norms were used for scoring as the scale's authors report these as being more accurate than combined gender norms

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026