Skip to content

Can a Digital Tooll Facilitate Shared Decision-making and Increase Self-efficacy in Vocational Rehabilitation?

Does the Application of a Digital Tool With Real-time, Self-reported Data Facilitate Shared Decision-making and Increase Self-efficacy in Vocational Rehabilitation? A Mixed Methods Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04695002
Enrollment
20
Registered
2021-01-05
Start date
2021-01-10
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Pain

Keywords

Rehabilitation, Vocational, Telemedicine

Brief summary

The study investigates both the effects and the experienced value of the mobile application, MIRA, which is a combination of an electronic diary, a dialogue tool and a decision support tool. The individual user registers real-time data reported in a mobile application, e.g. pain, sleep, mood, social activities, work-related activities, based on the goals and condition of the individual user. In this study, users are citizens participating in vocational rehabilitation due to long term sick leave. The purpose of MIRA is to support a positive and trustful relationship between the citizen and the professional, and to enhance user involvement and shared decision making in the course of rehabilitation. This happens through promotion of the citizens knowledge and understanding of their own health condition and increase his or her self-efficacy, i.e. their ability to cope with their health condition at work and in everyday life. The study uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, analysed both individually and in combination, where findings of the different methods are combined to provide a deeper understanding of the positive and negative effects of using MIRA in vocational rehabilitation. In this way the study investigates both the effect of applying a digital tool, such as MIRA, on a number of quantifiable measures (using questionnaires), and at the same time the study explores what works for whom and why using qualitative and combined methods. In this way, the study aims to contribute with knowledge in a balanced manner, regarding the pros and cons of using digital tools with real-time self-reported data in rehabilitation. The study aim will be fulfilled through the following sub-purposes: 1. To investigate the effect of using MIRA in a course of vocational rehabilitation in relation to the citizens' self-efficacy for pain and work and their experience of shared decision-making in the course of rehabilitation. 2. To investigate the citizens' experience with and perception of using a digital tool like MIRA in their course of rehabilitation. 3. To investigate the professionals' experience with and perception of using a digital tool like MIRA in the course of rehabilitation. 4. To investigate the mechanisms of effect of MIRA (i.e. what works for whom and why), through and integrated analysis of the findings of sub-purpose 1-3.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMIRA

Based on the initial assessment, the citizen and professional agree what outcomes the citizen should report in MIRA. This could be pain, mood, sleep quality, energy level, dependent on the priorities of the citizen. Similarly, different activities are reported, e.g. exercise, social activities, prolonged sitting or work-related tasks. The citizen and the professional agree how often the citizen reports the outcomes and tasks, and the citizen is notified by the MIRA-app when it's time for reporting. The data will be visualized in a graph for the professional in the back-end of the system, making it possible for the citizen and the professional to view the same, real-time reported data. This provides the base for discussing and adjusting the course of rehabilitation as symptoms change over time. At the same time, this increases the citizen's knowledge of how symptoms, mood, sleep and activities all interact, thereby giving them the tools better cope with their health condition.

BEHAVIORALControl

Citizens in the control group participate in the standard course of vocational rehabilitation, without the use of MIRA app. Citizens are referred from the jobcenter if the case manager assesses that a health condition limits the citizen's ability to resume work. The typical course of rehabilitation lasts 4-12 weeks, and is managed by a physiotherapist, a psychologist and a physician. Depending on the condition of the citizen, the rehabilitation may be managed by only two of the three professionals. During the course of rehabilitation, the citizen may consult the team with varying frequency. If physical rehabilitation is part of the prescribed rehabilitation, the citizen shows up twice per week for several weeks of supervised exercise, whereas rehabilitation courses where self-management is in focus, only biweekly consultations may be provided. The decisions and planning of contents and duration of the rehabilitation programme is done in collaboration with the citizen.

Sponsors

Aarhus County, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Region MidtJylland Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Referred for a course of vocational rehabilitation at a multidisciplinary health care unit at a municipal employment department. * On sick leave or unemployed due to musculoskeletal or stress-related disorders * In the working age (18 - 68 years approximately)

Exclusion criteria

* On sick leave or unemployed for other reasons, e.g. psychiatric disorders or cancer; * Under the age of 18 or older than 68 years (approximately) * Not sufficiently familiar with Danish language to use the MIRA app as intended.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Return-to-work Self-efficacy Scale (RTW-SE)At baseline and at end of rehabilitation, an average of 8 weeksThe RTW-SE is a 10-item questionnaire measuring the respondent's self-efficacy for coping with their health condition in relation to returning to work. Score ranges from 10-50 points, with 50 points reflecting the highest level of self-efficacy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CollaboRATEAt end of rehabilitation, an average of 8 weeksCollaboRATE is a 3-item questionnaire, measuring to what extent the respondent feels involved in the decision making process in their course of rehabilitation (i.e. shared decision making) on a scale of 0-9 (worst-best). An average score of the three items is calculated
WHO-5At baseline and at end of rehabilitation, an average of 8 weeksWHO5-index is a 5-item generic questionnaire for measuring self-reported quality of life and general well-being. Each item is scored on a scale of 5 (best) to 0 (worst), adding up to a total score of 0-25

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Usability of MIRAAt the end of rehabilitation, an average of 8 weeksFor participants in the MIRA group 4 questions regarding the usability of MIRA is applied, e.g. the need for technical support in the use of MIRA.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026