Skip to content

Adherence and Quality of Life of CPAP for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Adherence and Quality of Life of CPAP for Obstructive Sleep Apnea With an Intervention Based on Stratification and Personalization of Care Plans: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04691479
Acronym
PIMA1-JO-PR
Enrollment
129
Registered
2020-12-31
Start date
2018-03-10
Completion date
2018-11-20
Last updated
2020-12-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Keywords

CPAP, Sleep Apnea, Adherence, Quality of Life

Brief summary

A multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.The control group followed the usual treatment, while the intervention group (PIMA) followed the treatment with an adapted and flexible care plan depending on socio-demographic, clinical and psychological variables. The treatment plan includes different channels (home, telephone, care center), a continuous evaluation, and the use of the motivational interview in each of the interventions with the patient. The main outcome was adherence. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, emotional state, activities, social relationships, perceived competence and motivation.

Detailed description

The aim of this trial was to determine adherence to CPAP and health- related outcomes in patients with OSA via a comprehensive and multidisciplinary program based on stratification and individualized care plans, including the motivational interview. A multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT) design was used. The control group followed the usual treatment, while the intervention group (PIMA) followed the treatment with an adapted and flexible care plan depending on socio-demographic, clinical and psychological variables. The treatment plan includes different channels (home, telephone, care center), a continuous evaluation, and the use of the motivational interview in each of the interventions with the patient. The main outcome was adherence. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, emotional state, activities, social relationships, perceived competence and motivation.

Interventions

1. MEntA: Educational & Training Program 2. Stratification: Identification of Personal Variables (Age, Level of study, Work status, preference of care attention, digital behaviour) 3. Adherence evaluation: Evaluation of Perceived Competence, Quality of Life, Mood, Activities, Social relations and Social Support 4. Identification of Care plan and Schedule next visits 5. Follow-up D30-D60-D90-D180 depending of the care plan, through the channel that belong for each care plan

The nurse takes the compliance of the CPAP device, and ask to the patient if he had some problems.

Sponsors

Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.
CollaboratorOTHER
Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
CollaboratorOTHER
Air Liquide Healthcare Spain
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

After confirming their participation in the study, the patient was randomly assigned to one group or another, receiving the treatment as established in the protocol according to group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Older than 18 years * Diagnosis of OSA confirmed by sleep studies with polygraphy (PS) and / or polysomnography (PSG)

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with obesity-related hypoventilation * Severe COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) * Cognitive disorders and those unable to understand the consent to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence (changes)Day 90, Day 180Number of hours of use of CPAP per night
Somnolence (changes)Day 1, Day 90, Day 180Residual sleepiness after use of CPAP. Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Minimum score: 0; Maximum: 24. Higher scores=worse outcome
Perceived Competence (changes)Day 1, Day 90, Day 180Self-Efficacy in the CPAP treatment. Perceived Competence Evaluation Questionnaire. Minimum score: 0; Maximum score 13. Higher score= Better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life (Changes)Day 1, Day 90, Day 180Well-Being of the patient related to sleep apnea. Analogical Well-Being in Sleep Apnea Scale. Mininum score: 0; Maximum score: 10. Higher score= better outcome.
Social Relations (Changes)Day 1, Day 90, Day 180Improving general social relations after use CPAP. Ad hoc question. Minimum score: 0; maximum score: 3. Higher score: Better outcome.
Mood (Changes)Day 1, Day 90, Day 180Emotional status related to sleep apnea. Ad hoc question. Minimum score: 0; maximum score: 3. Higher score: Better outcome.
Activities (Changes)Day 1, Day 90, Day 180Improving general activity after use CPAP. Ad hoc question. Minimum score: 0; maximum score: 3. Higher score: Better outcome.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026