Skip to content

Erector Spinae Muscle Block Versus Caudal Block by Sonar in Pediatrics Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery

Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Muscle Block Versus Ultrasound-guided Caudal Block in Pediatric Patient Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04690894
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-12-31
Start date
2019-07-15
Completion date
2020-02-15
Last updated
2021-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Analgesia

Brief summary

this prospective randomized double blind controlled study was conducted on 60 child scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. the patients were randomly allocated into 3 parallel groups.group (ESB) patients received ultrasound-guided erector spinae block in a dose of 0.4mg/ml of 0.25%bupivacaine between the 10th transverse process and erector spinae muscles.group(CB) patients received ultrasound-guided caudal block in a dose of 2.5mg/kg of 0.25%bupivacaine. group(CO) did,t received any block

Detailed description

on arrival of the patients to the operative theatre and after placement of the standard monitoring general inhalational anesthesia was induced by face mask with sevoflurane (4-8%) in oxygen after IV cannula was secured patients received 1mic/kg fentanyl and intubation was facilitated by 0.5mg/kg atracurium. isoflurane 1-2% with oxygen was used for maintenance of anesthesia. after stabilization of the patient's hemodynamics and before skin incision erector spinae block or caudal block was performed with the patient in lateral position. after the block patients were flipped back to their normal supine position, surgery took place 10 min after injection of local anesthetic. after termination of surgery reversal of the atracurium was done by giving neostigmine in a dose of 0.04mg/kg and atropine 0.02mg/kg and awake extubation was done

Interventions

PROCEDUREerector spinae block - caudal block

the child placed in lateral position identification of spinous process of 10th thoracic vertebral then the transducer was moved 2.5 cm laterally to visualize the transverse process and a total of 0.4mg/kg of 0.25%bupivacaine was adminstered

Sponsors

Minia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 6 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* pediatric patients aged 2-6 years scheduled for lower abdominal surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* parent refusal * spinal and meningeal anomalies * mental retardation * blood disease * infection at site of injection * drug allergy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
number of patients need rescue analgesia24 hourstotal number of patients need addition of anagesia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First analgesic request24 hoursFirst time that patient require analgesia
Hemodynamic changes in the study period24 hoursChanges in HR and blood pressure

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026