Skip to content

Elective Umbilical Hernia Repair in Patients With Cirrhosis

Elective Umbilical Hernia Repair in Patients With Cirrhosis - a Prospective, Controlled Interventional Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04687579
Enrollment
51
Registered
2020-12-29
Start date
2021-08-01
Completion date
2023-09-01
Last updated
2021-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cirrhosis, Umbilical Hernia

Brief summary

Liver cirrhosis is a frequent and severe chronic disease. About 20 % of patients with liver cirrhosis develop umbilical hernias. In comparison, the prevalence in the general population is around 2 %. Patients with liver cirrhosis are often neglected and are not offered equal surgical treatments compared with other patient groups with chronic diseases due to fear of postoperative complications. The current literature is sparse, and many questions remain to be answered, such as timing of repair, risk profile, preoperative staging of the liver disease, possible optimization before surgery, repair technique, and postoperative care. Moreover, nationwide data are lacking. The management of umbilical hernias in patients with cirrhosis is debated. Recently, European Hernia Society published guidelines stating that elective hernia repair may be safe, and that emergency repair is associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Nonetheless, surgeons remain reluctant to perform elective surgery on these patients due to fear of complications and mortality. The evidence supporting the guidelines is sparse and consists of small, low quality studies. One of the major concerns is that the existing studies failed to use clear and well-described definitions of the underlying severity of the liver disease. The rate of emergency repair may be much higher in patients with liver cirrhosis compared with the general population but there is no data available. The rate of emergency vs elective repair in patients with liver cirrhosis in Denmark is unknown, as well as the rate of reoperation for complications and readmission. Finally, we hypothesize that these patients may benefit from a more proactive approach with early diagnosis of their umbilical hernia by screening, preoperative optimization, and early elective hernia repair, but the effect of this hypothesis needs further evaluation.

Interventions

OTHERScreening

Screening: All health professionals at the hospitals will participate in the screening of umbilical hernia. The screening will be done in the outpatient clinic, the Emergency Department and at the hospital wards.

PROCEDUREPreoperative optimization

Ascites will be drained using percutaneous drainage or PleurX. Diuretics be used to control ascites preoperative. Haemoglobin \< 5 mmol/L indicates the need for red blood cell concentrates using two dosage SAG-M (350-400 mL of red blood cell concentrates in each dose) will be done. Thrombocytopenia \< 150 10\^9/L will be treated with a TPO-analog using avatrombopag 40-60 mg dispensed as an intravenous fluid. Culture verified infection will be treated with specific antibiotics depending on the blood culture. International Normalized Ratio \> 1.7 will be treated with either phytomenadion, Octaplex or fresh frozen plasma depending on the INR.

A curved incision placed superiorly or inferiorly around the umbilicus. The umbilicus proper is retained in the skin flap. The blunt dissection is made to the hernia sac. The neck of the herniated sac is then dissected from adjacent tissues by a combination of blunt and sharp dissection. The edges of the fascial defect are measured and the fascial defect is closed with a non-absorbable running suture 2-0. A fitted lightweight polypropylene mesh is placed in an onlay fashion and fixed with 4-8 single non-absorbable sutures in the corners and at the midline, with a mesh overlap of at least 4 cm. The umbilicus is re-inserted with a single knot absorbable suture 3-0. Hemostasis is ensured. Skin closure is performed with Nylon suture 3-0. 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% is injected to the fascia for early pain control.

Sponsors

Hvidovre University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients must meet all the following criteria to be eligible to enrol in the study: * Age ≥18 years and ≤80 years * ASA I-III * Patients with a diagnosis of liver cirrhosis * Patients with a diagnosis of umbilical hernia (primary or recurrent umbilical hernia) * Hernia defect size 0,5 cm - 6 cm, only one defect * Patients who have given written informed consent to participate in the study after having understood this

Exclusion criteria

Patients who meet one or more of the following criteria are not eligible to be enrolled in this study * Patients who cannot cooperate with the trial. * Patients who cannot read and understand Danish. * Alcohol- and/or drug abuse - to the discretion of the investigator. * Fascial gap \> 6 cm * Umbilical hernia repair secondary to another procedure * If a patient withdraws his/her inclusion consent * Patients in dialysis Exclusion from operation Patients who meet one or more of following criteria on procedure day will not undergo surgery, but can undergo surgery at a later date if none of the criteria are fulfilled: * ASA IV * Culture verified infection within two weeks prior to umbilical hernia repair * Anemia (Hgb \< 5?) * International Normalized Ratio \> 1.7 * Thrombocytopenia (\<100 mill/mL) * Large amount of ascitic fluid * If the operation is considered too risky by any investigator, a patient can always be excluded from surgical intervention based on individual assessment. * Patients presenting with complicated umbilical hernia (incarceration, rupture, strangulation or ulceration) and the need for acute surgical intervention. * Patients with BMI \> 35 will not undergo surgery. If the patient during inclusion period does not fulfil this criterion (BMI \< 35), other

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Serious Adverse Events6 months after umbilical hernia repair and/or inclusion1. Death 2. Life-threatening adverse experience after surgery 3. Inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization (for \> 24 hours) 4. Persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Events6 months after umbilical hernia repair and/or inclusion1. A new event which was not pre-existing before intervention. 2. A pre-existing event which recurs with increased intensity or increased frequency in the follow-up period. 3. An event which is present at the time of intervention which is exacerbated following initial intervention.

Contacts

Primary ContactChristian Snitkjær, M.B.
christian_snit@hotmail.com23670279
Backup ContactMette W. Willaume, M.D.
mette.willaume@gmail.com26288934

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026