Skip to content

Comparison of Polyethylene Insert Variances of Different Total Knee Arthroplasty System in the Same Patients

Comparison of 1-mm Thickness Variance Polyethylene Insert Total Knee Arthroplasty System and 2-mm Thickness Variance Polyethylene Insert Total Knee Arthroplasty System in the Same Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04687462
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-12-29
Start date
2021-01-31
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2020-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Total Knee Replacement Arthroplasty

Brief summary

Total knee arthroplasty(TKA) is a successful orthopedic surgery with excellent clinical outcome and survival. However, there are concerns about patient satisfaction in previous reports, and dissatisfaction rate of 15-30% is reported in clinical outcomes(PROMs) of some studies. Therefore, for improving the patient's outcome and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty, it is necessary to change the design of the conventional total knee arthroplsaty implant. The knee is a joint structure with several dynamic functions, and not only the skeletal structure but also the soft tissue balance plays an important role in the function of the knee joint. New implants are being developed to overcome the limitations of conventional TKA implant, including the Exult total knee system (Exult; Corentec). Exult implant has 1mm thickness variance of polyethylene insert, which is different from the conventional total knee systems. This new total knee system has been shown in experimental studies to produce nearly normal knee movement. The clinical results of this more specific variance of polyethyelen insert thickness total knee implant system are insufficient, and there is also a lack of comparative studies with conventional total knee arthroplasty implant. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes between 1-mm thickness variance polyethylene insert total knee arthroplasty system(Exult, total knee system, Corentec) and conventional 2-mm thickness variance polyethylene insert total knee arthroplasty system(Lospa total knee system, Corentec) in the same patients. This study is a randomized controlled study in patients undergoing both knee total knee arthroplasty in a day. Radiologic parameter, patients preference and clinical results was investigated in both knee of same patients who received TKA during minimum 2 year follow up.

Detailed description

This study is a prospective, single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients undergoing bilateral total knee replacement arthroplasty(TKRA) for both knee osteoarthritis will receive written consent from the patient through informed consent before the surgery. Among the patients undergoing total arthroplasty for both knee joints, only patients who have agreed with written consent will receive the surgery. In one patient who has been decided to be erolled for the stedy, we will set one knee joint as the experimental group, and the other knee joint as the control group. The experimental group will undergo TKRA using Exult total knee system and the control group will get TKRA using Lospa total knee system. The researcher performing the surgery can know which instruments are used for each knee joint according to the random number table assignment result, but the subjects undergoing surgery will be conducted as a single blinded study where it is not possible to know which instruments are used for each side.

Interventions

DEVICE1-mm thickness variance polyethylene insert total knee arthroplasty system (Exult, Corentec)

TKRA operation undergoing 1-mm thickness variance polyethylene insert total knee arthroplasty system (Exult, Corentec)

Sponsors

The Catholic University of Korea
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The researcher performing the surgery can know which instruments are used for each knee joint according to the random number table assignment result, but the subjects undergoing surgery will be conducted as a single blinded study where it is not possible to know which instruments are used for each side.

Intervention model description

This study is a prospective, single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients undergoing bilateral total knee replacement arthroplasty(TKRA) for both knee osteoarthritis will receive written consent from the patient through informed consent before the surgery. Among the patients undergoing total arthroplasty for both knee joints, only patients who have agreed with written consent will receive the surgery. In one patient who has been decided to be erolled for the stedy, we will set one knee joint as the experimental group, and the other knee joint as the control group. The experimental group will undergo TKRA using Exult total knee system and the control group will get TKRA using Lospa total knee system.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Knee osteoarthritis patients for both total knee arthroplasty * having medicare insurance

Exclusion criteria

* Rheumatoid arthritis * Other inflammatory arthritis * Crystal-induced arthritis * Septic arthritis * Neuropsychiatric patients * Previous knee operation history * Patients with preoperative severe limitation of motion (Flexion ontracture ≥ 20, range of motion ≤ 90) * Patients with preoperative severe defomity of knee alignment (Varus or valgus angle ≥ 15) * Severe obese patients (BMI ≥ 40)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index(WOMAC) pain scalePreoperative & postoperative 3, 6, 12, 24 monthsChanges of post-operative WOMAC score from pre-operative WOMAC scores at post-operative 3, 6, 12, 24 months WOMAC score ranges (0 \ 96 in total score)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee Society ScorePreoperative & postoperative 3, 6, 12, 24 monthsChanges of post-operative Knee Society Score from pre-operative Knee Society Score scores at post-operative 3, 6, 12, 24 months KSS score ranges (0 \ 150 in total score)
Knee range of motionPreoperative & postoperative 3, 6, 12, 24 monthsChanges of post-operative knee ROM from pre-operative knee ROM at post-operative 3, 6, 12, 24 months (normal knee full range motion is 0 degree to 135 degrees in flexion)

Contacts

Primary ContactYong In, MD, PhD
iy1000@catholic.ac.kr821090445228
Backup ContactYonggyu Sung, MD
ygsung@catholic.ac.kr821092160997

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026