Effect of Different Implant Surface Treatments on Bony Changes Around Mandibular Implants

Effect of Different Implant Surface Treatments on Bony Changes Around Mandibular Implants for Completely Edentulous Patients (A Split-mouth Comparative Study)

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT04686370

Enrollment

Registered

2020-12-28

Start date

2020-10-06

Completion date

2021-10-31

Last updated

2020-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complete Edentulism

Keywords

Dental implant, Surface treatment, Laser, Sandblasted Acid-etched implants, Delayed-loading, Bony changes, Marginal bone loss

Brief summary

The research will be conducted to report which type of surface treatment of dental implants that can be successful and aids in increasing bone to implant contact and how it affects the bony changes around the implants installed in mandibular arches for completely edentulous patients or whether there are specific precautions to be taken into consideration during implant planning concerned with the type of surface microstructure treatment and recommendations needed.

Detailed description

Primary objective: PICO P: Completely edentulous patients I: Laser surface treatment of implants C: Sandblasted Acid etched surface treatment O: Bony changes Each Participants will have 2 implants;one laser surface treated implants and another sandblasted acid-etched implant (split-mouth) installed in the intra-foraminal area of mandibular arch prosthetically driven by the prepared conventional denture. MS and AF are responsible for delayed-loading of the denture and will measure bony changes around laser treated surface implants using radiographic assessment using long paralleling technique periapical digital x-ray(SOREDEX™ DIGORA™ Optime)

Interventions

OTHERlaser treated implant surface

Better marginal bone stability is expected for this type

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

PREVENTION

Masking

SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

one single group will receive both types of dental implants (Split-mouth)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

35 Years to 60 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Completely edentulous patients * Angle's class 1 skeletal relationship * Normal facial asymmetry * Cooperative patients * Adequate inter-arch spcae not less than 12mm

Exclusion criteria

* Tempromandibular joint disorder * Uncontrolled diabetes * Bleeding disorders or anticoagulant therapy * Flabby tissues or sharp mandibular residual ridge * Heavy smoker * Patient's with neuromuscular disorders * Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy * Severe psychiatric disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Marginal bone stability around dental implants	1 year	Measuring amount of marginal bone loss by radiographic assessment using long paralleling technique periapical digital x-ray(SOREDEX™ DIGORA™ Optime)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026