Tooth Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The clinical performance of a restorative glass ionomer and bulk-fill resin composite in class II restorations will be evaluated and compared. After recruiting participants with at least 2 approximal caries lesions, all restorations will be placed by a single clinician. All caries lesions will be removed before restoring. Cavities will be divided into two groups: a restorative glass ionomer \[Equia Forte HT, GC, Tokyo, Japan (EHT)\] and bulk-fill composite resin \[SonicFill2, Orange, CA, USA (SBF)\] All restorative procedures will be conducted according to manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be scored using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria after a week (baseline) 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. Descriptive statistics will be performed using chi-square tests.
Interventions
DEVICEGlass ionomer
Equia Forte HT, GC, Tokyo, Japan
DEVICEBulk-fill composite
SonicFill2, Orange, CA, USA
Sponsors
Hacettepe University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* age range will be 18 to 65 * patients should have at least 2 approximal caries lesions require restoration * healthy periodontal status * a good likelihood of recall availability
Exclusion criteria
* poor gingival health * adverse medical history * potential behavioral problems
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical performances of different restorative systems according to USPHS criteria | two years | Two year results according to USPHS criteria |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed