Skip to content

Slump Physiotherapy : Effect on the physiologicAl Knee Extension Range-of-motion

Effect of Neurodynamic Mobilization Techniques on Knee Extension Range of Motion of Asymptomatic Young Students: a Prospective, Comparative Study.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04685863
Acronym
SPEAKER
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-12-28
Start date
2020-12-02
Completion date
2020-12-16
Last updated
2020-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Extension

Keywords

Neurodynamic Mobilization Technique, Physiotherapy, SLUMP

Brief summary

Background: The neurodynamics technique seems interesting for increased lower limb flexibility of the lower limbs in healthy subjects. The objective of this study is to assess the physiological effects of the SLUMP sliding technique on the range of knee extension during the SLUMP test. Methods: 60 physiotherapy students perform measurements during three tutorials. The first involves training in evaluation techniques. The second involves mobilizing the knee, out of the SLUMP position. The third tutorial includes neuronal mobilization in SLUMP. Knee extension in SLUMP position is measured immediately after completing techniques. The mobilization amplitudes (degrees) will be compared between the techniques by a Student test on paired series, each subject being his own control. Discussion: The results of this study will provide evidence for the physiological effect of SLUMP sliding techniques performed by physiotherapy students on the range of knee extension during the SLUMP test in asymptomatic subjects.

Interventions

OTHERMobilizing the knee with active neurodynamic sliding technique (active Slump slider)

60 physiotherapy students perform measurements during three tutorials. The first involves training in evaluation techniques. The second involves mobilizing the knee, out of the SLUMP position. The third tutorial includes neuronal mobilization in SLUMP.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Rouen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Students enrolled in second year of physiotherapy training in Rouen's physiotherapy Institute, taking part to neurodynamic technique course unit (CU 7) * Ability to perform daily physiotherapy techniques, assessed by an accredited doctor from regional health agency and a medical examination during the first year of scholarship (occupational medicine service of Rouen's University hospital) * French commonly spoken and red * Aged 18 or older * Registered to the national care & health system (Social security number) * Willingness to take part to the study

Exclusion criteria

* Person denied of freedom by judicial or administrative decision * Person requiring a guardian, guardianship or curators * History of psychological disease/illness or sensorial disease preventing from understanding the recruitment conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Knee extension angle achieved in SLUMP test position: - after a control technique during the second practical work (TD2)day 14 from inclusiondegree
Knee extension angle achieved in SLUMP test position : - after neurodynamic sliding techniques in SLUMP during the third practical work (TD3)day 21 from inclusiondegree

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Finger-to-floor distancedays 14 and 21 from inclusioncentimeter
Hamstring flexibility (passive knee extension test)days 14 and 21 from inclusiondegree
Angle of knee extension achieved in SLUMP test between active neurodynamic technique group and passive neurodynamic technique groupdays 14 and 21 from inclusiondegree

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactTimothée Gillot, PhD
Timothee.Gillot@chu-rouen.fr02 32 88 06 71
Backup Contactvalérie de La Moussaye
valerie.De-La-Moussaye@chu-rouen.fr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026