Skip to content

Comparison of Surgical Extrusion vs. Fibre Post Restoration for Crown-root Fractured Maxillary Incisors.

Comparison of Surgical Extrusion vs Fibre Post Restoration for Crown-root Fractured Maxillary Incisors. Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04685161
Enrollment
140
Registered
2020-12-28
Start date
2021-01-15
Completion date
2023-05-31
Last updated
2021-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fractured Tooth

Brief summary

A total of 124 samples was calculated to be sufficient with G\*power software ver 3.1.9.2 with effect size of 0.4 alpha probability error and power 0.95.With drop out estimate of 10% the final sample size decided was 140 samples. Patients reporting with complicated(pulp exposed or pulpally involved) horizontal crown root fracture with loss of crown structure in maxillary incisors and radiograph evidence of supra alveolar tooth structure are recruited for study. Informed consent from the patients or guardian as appropriate is obtained as suitable prior to treatment delivery. Exclusion criteria were:patients not willing for recall visits, root with evidence of cervical resorption or roor canal filling, open apices, patient with systemic ailments rendering root canal treatment, compromised periodontal health, vertical or horizontal root fracture. Pulpal condition of tooth was assessed using cold sensibility test(Neosnow, orikam health care Ltd, India.) amd confirmed upon access opening with teeth showing evidence of pulpal bleeding wad categorized as irreversible pulpitis and teeth with no evidence of pulpal bleeding categorized as necrotic pulp.

Detailed description

Patients are randomly alloted to treatment groups. Group I-Root canal treatment followed by surgical extrusion of teeth till about 40%supra gingival crown structure is visible clinically. Group II-Root canal treatment followed by glass fibre post placement (Reforpost, Angelus, Brazil) and composite (charisma smart, Germany) core build up with porcelain fused metal crown. Post treatment visits are scheduled 6,12,18 months, scheduled visits were planned as close as possible to the study protocol, but for the purpose of data collection, any recall visit occuring within plus or minus 10% of the advocated time was considered aa occuring at that time. Recall visit check up included clinical examination for mobility, periapical tenderness, gingival pocket depth estimation,bleeding on probing and radiographic examination. Patients are asked to report immediately of any unforeseen circumstances arises in the restored teeth.

Interventions

Invasive treatment option for fractured tooth

DEVICEFibre post

Easy approach for treatment

Sponsors

Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

2 groups are used One using fibre post placement And the other using surgical extrusion

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with complicated crown root fracture * patients willing for recall * Good oral hygiene

Exclusion criteria

* patients not willing for recall * Patients health rendering root canal treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic healing of teeth is measured18 monthsPeriapical index score(PAI) is used for assessment

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactRAHUL BASKAR, MDS
raghulram22@gmail.com9 1 7598326175
Backup ContactANAND SHERWOOD, MDS
anand.sherwood@gmail.com919791443050

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026