Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
KRAS G12C, Non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC, Metastatic Cancer, Docetaxel, Phase 3 Clinical Trial, Adagrasib, KRAS, KRAZATI
Brief summary
This Phase 3 study will evaluate the efficacy of the investigational agent MRTX849 (adagrasib) versus docetaxel in patients who have been previously treated for metastatic NSCLC with a KRAS G12C mutation.
Interventions
21 day cycles
21 day cycles
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation. * Candidacy to receive treatment with docetaxel. Crossover Inclusion Criteria: * Evidence of RECIST 1.1 defined disease progression on docetaxel per BICR * ECOG performance status 0-2
Exclusion criteria
* Prior treatment with an agent targeting KRAS G12C (e.g., AMG 510, Sotorasib). * Active brain metastases. Crossover
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review | From randomization to the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 143 weeks) | Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. 95% CI was obtained using Brookmeyer and Crowley method. Participants who are not observed to have progressed or died are censored at the date of last evaluable tumor assessment. Disease progression assessed as per RECISIST 1.1 was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review | From randomization till death or till disease progression or initiation of follow-up anti-cancer therapy or withdrawal of consent prior to minimum efficacy follow-up (up to 143 weeks) | Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the percent of participants documented to have a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \< 10 mm). All target lesions must be assessed. PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. All target lesions must be assessed. Disease progression was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review | First documentation of objective response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of PD or to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 22 months) | Duration of Response (DOR) in months is defined as the time from date of the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of PD or to death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \< 10 mm). All target lesions must be assessed. PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. All target lesions must be assessed. Disease progression was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. |
| 1-Year Survival Rate | Up to 49 months | — |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | From first dose of treatment (Day 1) till 28 days after last dose (Up to approximately 110 weeks) | Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are those that first occur or increase in severity on or after the first dose and not more than 28 days after the last dose, and prior to the initiation of subsequent systemic anti-cancer therapy. An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. |
| Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | From first dose of treatment (Day 1) till 28 days after last dose (Up to approximately 110 weeks) | Blood samples were collected to assess hematology parameters. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 0 to 4 based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0, with Grade 0 being normal Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization. |
| Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | From first dose of treatment (Day 1) till 28 days after last dose (Up to approximately 110 weeks) | Blood samples were collected to assess chemistry parameters. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 0 to 4 based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0, with Grade 0 being normal Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | From randomization till death due to any cause (up to approximately 143 weeks) | Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. |
| Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | Baseline (Day 1) and up to End of Treatment (Up to approximately 106 weeks) | The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) is a disease measure of quality of life which evaluates six major lung cancer symptoms and their effect on overall distress and symptom severity, impact on day-to-day activities, and overall quality of life. This patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire assesses the following 6 symptoms items (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, pain) and 3 summary global items (symptom distress, activity level, overall quality of life) for patients using visual analogue scales (VAS) (100 mm horizontal line) ranging from 0 (best rating) to 100 (worst rating). The LCSS average total score is sum of items 1 to 9 divided by the total number of items ((sum of items 1 to 9)/9) ranging from 0 to 100 where high score represent worst outcome. Least Square Mean and Confidence Interval are from a repeated measures model on the response variable change from baseline in LCSS average total score. |
| Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Symptom Burden Index Score | Baseline (Day 1) and up to End of Treatment (Up to approximately 106 weeks) | The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) is a disease measure of quality of life which evaluates six major lung cancer symptoms and their effect on overall distress and symptom severity, impact on day-to-day activities, and overall quality of life. This patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire for average symptom burden index score assesses the following six items (Appetite loss, fatigue, cough, shortness of breath, blood in sputum, pain) for patients using visual analogue scales (VAS) (100 mm horizontal line) ranging from 0 (best rating) to 100 (worst rating). The average symptom burden score is average of all the 6 items ranging from 0 to 100 where high score represent worst outcome. Least square mean and CI are from a repeated measures model on the response variable change from baseline in average symptom burden index score. |
| Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) 3-Item Global Index Score | Baseline (Day 1) and up to End of Treatment (Up to approximately 106 weeks) | The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) is a disease measure of quality of life which evaluates six major lung cancer symptoms and their effect on overall distress and symptom severity, impact on day-to-day activities, and overall quality of life. This patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire for average 3-item global index score assesses the following 3 items (Distress/severity of symptoms from lung cancer, impact on normal activities, quality of life) for patients using visual analogue scales (VAS) (100 mm horizontal line) ranging from 0 (best rating) to 100 (worst rating). The 3 item global index score is average of all the 3 items ranging from 0 to 100 where high score represent worst outcome. LS mean and CI are from a repeated measures model on the response variable change from baseline in 3-item global index score. |
| Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale Score | Baseline (Day 1) and up to End of Treatment (Up to approximately 106 weeks) | The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) is a component of the EQ-5D-5L and assesses the patient's self-rated health using a vertical visual analogue scale where numbered 0 (the worst health you can image) to 100 (the best health you can imageine). The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 7 points. |
| Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health Utility Index Score | Baseline (Day 1) and up to End of Treatment (Up to approximately 106 weeks) | The European Quality of Life 5D-5L Scale (EQ-5D-5L) assesses general health-related quality of life. Health is defined in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses are coded so that a '1' indicates no problem, and '5' indicates the most serious problem. The responses for the 5 dimensions are combined in a 5-digit number. The EQ-5D-5L health utility index (HUI) is assessed using the Crosswalk algorithm for France based on the individual responses to the 5 EQ-5D-5L domains ranging from -0.594 to 1.000. The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 0.08 points. Least square mean and CI are from a repeated measures model on the response variable change from baseline in health utility index. |
| Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Pre-Dose and Peak), Cycle 2 (Pre-Dose and Peak), Cycle 3 (Pre-Dose), Cycle 5 (Pre-Dose), Cycle 7 (Pre-Dose) (Each cycle is of 21 days) | Blood samples were collected for assessment of plasma concentration of Adagrasib. Data for participants for which the dose was reduced after receiving starting dose of 600 mg BID, based on physician decision is presented in separate arms. |
Countries
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Adagrasib Participants with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS G12C mutation and who have received prior therapy with a platinum-based regimen and an immune checkpoint inhibitor were administered in 3-week cycle with Adagrasib tablet or capsule orally at a starting dose of 600 mg twice a day (BID). | 301 |
| Docetaxel Participants with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS G12C mutation and who have received prior therapy with a platinum-based regimen and an immune checkpoint inhibitor were administered in 3-week cycle with intravenous infusion of Docetaxel at 75 mg/m\^2 over 1 hour or according to institutional practices. | 152 |
| Total | 453 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 126 | 53 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 12 | 16 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Docetaxel | Adagrasib |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 63.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.38 | 63.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.81 | 63.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.66 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 14 Participants | 6 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 310 Participants | 111 Participants | 199 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 129 Participants | 35 Participants | 94 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 109 Participants | 37 Participants | 72 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Missing | 14 Participants | 3 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Not Reported | 111 Participants | 30 Participants | 81 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 216 Participants | 81 Participants | 135 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 150 Participants | 42 Participants | 108 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 303 Participants | 110 Participants | 193 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 126 / 301 | 53 / 152 | 15 / 44 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 292 / 298 | 129 / 140 | 43 / 44 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 149 / 298 | 50 / 140 | 20 / 44 |
Outcome results
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization to the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. 95% CI was obtained using Brookmeyer and Crowley method. Participants who are not observed to have progressed or died are censored at the date of last evaluable tumor assessment. Disease progression assessed as per RECISIST 1.1 was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Time frame: From randomization to the date of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 143 weeks)
Population: Intent-To-Treat Population includes all participants who are randomized into this study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review | 5.49 months |
| Docetaxel | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review | 3.84 months |
1-Year Survival Rate
Time frame: Up to 49 months
Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health Utility Index Score
The European Quality of Life 5D-5L Scale (EQ-5D-5L) assesses general health-related quality of life. Health is defined in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses are coded so that a '1' indicates no problem, and '5' indicates the most serious problem. The responses for the 5 dimensions are combined in a 5-digit number. The EQ-5D-5L health utility index (HUI) is assessed using the Crosswalk algorithm for France based on the individual responses to the 5 EQ-5D-5L domains ranging from -0.594 to 1.000. The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 0.08 points. Least square mean and CI are from a repeated measures model on the response variable change from baseline in health utility index.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to End of Treatment (Up to approximately 106 weeks)
Population: Intent-To-Treat Population includes all participants who are randomized into this study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health Utility Index Score | -0.0350 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health Utility Index Score | -0.0914 Score on a scale |
Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale Score
The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) is a component of the EQ-5D-5L and assesses the patient's self-rated health using a vertical visual analogue scale where numbered 0 (the worst health you can image) to 100 (the best health you can imageine). The smallest change considered clinically meaningful, is defined as a score difference of 7 points.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to End of Treatment (Up to approximately 106 weeks)
Population: Intent-To-Treat Population includes all participants who are randomized into this study. LS mean and CI are from a repeated measures model on the response variable change from baseline in visual analogue scale.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale Score | 0.1 Score on a scale |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline at End of Treatment in European Quality of Life Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale Score | -3.7 Score on a scale |
Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) 3-Item Global Index Score
The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) is a disease measure of quality of life which evaluates six major lung cancer symptoms and their effect on overall distress and symptom severity, impact on day-to-day activities, and overall quality of life. This patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire for average 3-item global index score assesses the following 3 items (Distress/severity of symptoms from lung cancer, impact on normal activities, quality of life) for patients using visual analogue scales (VAS) (100 mm horizontal line) ranging from 0 (best rating) to 100 (worst rating). The 3 item global index score is average of all the 3 items ranging from 0 to 100 where high score represent worst outcome. LS mean and CI are from a repeated measures model on the response variable change from baseline in 3-item global index score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to End of Treatment (Up to approximately 106 weeks)
Population: Intent-To-Treat Population includes all participants who are randomized into this study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) 3-Item Global Index Score | -3.0 Score on a sclae |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) 3-Item Global Index Score | 15.9 Score on a sclae |
Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Symptom Burden Index Score
The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) is a disease measure of quality of life which evaluates six major lung cancer symptoms and their effect on overall distress and symptom severity, impact on day-to-day activities, and overall quality of life. This patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire for average symptom burden index score assesses the following six items (Appetite loss, fatigue, cough, shortness of breath, blood in sputum, pain) for patients using visual analogue scales (VAS) (100 mm horizontal line) ranging from 0 (best rating) to 100 (worst rating). The average symptom burden score is average of all the 6 items ranging from 0 to 100 where high score represent worst outcome. Least square mean and CI are from a repeated measures model on the response variable change from baseline in average symptom burden index score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to End of Treatment (Up to approximately 106 weeks)
Population: Intent-To-Treat Population includes all participants who are randomized into this study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Symptom Burden Index Score | -5.8 Score on a sclae |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Symptom Burden Index Score | 3.2 Score on a sclae |
Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score
The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) is a disease measure of quality of life which evaluates six major lung cancer symptoms and their effect on overall distress and symptom severity, impact on day-to-day activities, and overall quality of life. This patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire assesses the following 6 symptoms items (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, pain) and 3 summary global items (symptom distress, activity level, overall quality of life) for patients using visual analogue scales (VAS) (100 mm horizontal line) ranging from 0 (best rating) to 100 (worst rating). The LCSS average total score is sum of items 1 to 9 divided by the total number of items ((sum of items 1 to 9)/9) ranging from 0 to 100 where high score represent worst outcome. Least Square Mean and Confidence Interval are from a repeated measures model on the response variable change from baseline in LCSS average total score.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to End of Treatment (Up to approximately 106 weeks)
Population: Intent-To-Treat Population includes all participants who are randomized into this study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | -4.0 Score on a sclae |
| Docetaxel | Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) Average Total Score | 3.9 Score on a sclae |
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review
Duration of Response (DOR) in months is defined as the time from date of the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of PD or to death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \< 10 mm). All target lesions must be assessed. PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. All target lesions must be assessed. Disease progression was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Time frame: First documentation of objective response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of PD or to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 22 months)
Population: Intent-To-Treat Population with Confirmed CR or PR. Intent-To-Treat Population includes all participants who are randomized into this study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review | 8.31 months |
| Docetaxel | Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review | 5.36 months |
Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters
Blood samples were collected to assess chemistry parameters. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 0 to 4 based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0, with Grade 0 being normal Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization.
Time frame: From first dose of treatment (Day 1) till 28 days after last dose (Up to approximately 110 weeks)
Population: Safety Population included all the participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Docetaxel arm do not include adverse events after initiation of crossover Adagrasib treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 0 | 135 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Missing | 18 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Missing | 122 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 3 | 13 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 0 | 177 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 1 | 82 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Missing | 134 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 4 | 5 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 2 | 23 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Missing | 11 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 2 | 58 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 2 | 31 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 0 | 118 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 1 | 15 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Missing | 11 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 0 | 146 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Missing | 12 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 2 | 16 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 0 | 260 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 0 | 99 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 1 | 24 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Missing | 11 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 1 | 45 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 2 | 11 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Missing | 30 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 1 | 133 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 0 | 165 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 1 | 109 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 0 | 103 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 3 | 8 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 1 | 43 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 0 | 237 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 1 | 65 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 0 | 181 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 2 | 27 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 1 | 107 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Missing | 12 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 3 | 20 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 1 | 98 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Missing | 12 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 0 | 251 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Missing | 15 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 1 | 24 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Missing | 11 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 1 | 14 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 2 | 9 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 3 | 34 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 0 | 272 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 1 | 55 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Missing | 12 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 2 | 126 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Missing | 11 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Missing | 12 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Missing | 11 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 2 | 20 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 1 | 63 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 0 | 230 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 1 | 54 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 2 | 27 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 0 | 206 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 0 | 185 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 0 | 265 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 2 | 17 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 1 | 67 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Missing | 13 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 0 | 213 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 1 | 126 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Missing | 12 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Missing | 13 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 0 | 118 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 1 | 19 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 0 | 163 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 0 | 118 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 1 | 12 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Missing | 10 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 0 | 55 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Missing | 13 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 0 | 111 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 0 | 109 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 1 | 19 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 0 | 115 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 1 | 14 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Missing | 11 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 0 | 125 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 0 | 99 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 1 | 17 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 2 | 11 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Missing | 16 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 0 | 122 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Missing | 13 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Missing | 13 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 0 | 66 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 1 | 51 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 2 | 22 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Missing | 12 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 0 | 108 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 1 | 19 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 1 | 14 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Missing | 13 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Missing | 10 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 0 | 107 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Missing | 19 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Missing | 12 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Missing | 10 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 0 | 64 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Missing | 72 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 0 | 109 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 2 | 6 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 0 | 99 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 1 | 25 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Missing | 66 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 0 | 107 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 1 | 15 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 2 | 6 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Missing | 11 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 0 | 130 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Missing | 11 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 0 | 114 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Missing | 10 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 0 | 95 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 1 | 32 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Missing | 10 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 0 | 103 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 1 | 22 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Missing | 15 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 2 | 4 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 1 | 10 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 0 | 18 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 0 | 29 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Missing | 6 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 1 | 19 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Missing | 19 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 0 | 19 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 0 | 28 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 0 | 22 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 0 | 25 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Missing | 6 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 0 | 14 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 0 | 23 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 0 | 39 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 0 | 37 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 0 | 31 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyponatremia Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 1 | 13 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Missing | 6 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 0 | 22 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypokalemia Grade 0 | 36 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypocalcemia Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Aspartate Aminotransferase increased Grade 0 | 25 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Bilirubin increased Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypercalcemia Grade 0 | 35 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Grade 2 | 15 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Creatinine increased Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 0 | 18 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Amylase increased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 1 | 13 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperuricemia Grade 1 | 17 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Fasted Hypoglycemia Missing | 23 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alanine Aminotransferase increased Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 1 | 14 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypoalbuminemia Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Lipase Increased Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hyperkalemia Grade 0 | 28 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypernatremia Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Non-Fasted Hypoglycemia Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 0 | 37 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypomagnesemia Missing | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Alkaline Phosphatase increased Grade 0 | 24 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Chemistry Parameters | Hypermagnesemia Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters
Blood samples were collected to assess hematology parameters. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 0 to 4 based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0, with Grade 0 being normal Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization.
Time frame: From first dose of treatment (Day 1) till 28 days after last dose (Up to approximately 110 weeks)
Population: Safety Population included all the participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Docetaxel arm do not include adverse events after initiation of crossover Adagrasib treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 2 | 16 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 0 | 235 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 2 | 8 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 1 | 66 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 2 | 8 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 0 | 208 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 2 | 71 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 0 | 61 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Missing | 41 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 3 | 52 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 2 | 74 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 4 | 8 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Missing | 40 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 0 | 227 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 1 | 155 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 1 | 74 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Missing | 3 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 0 | 50 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 1 | 10 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Missing | 4 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 4 | 8 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Missing | 4 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 3 | 16 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 1 | 36 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 0 | 33 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 0 | 61 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 1 | 13 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Missing | 28 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 1 | 13 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Missing | 11 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 1 | 20 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 2 | 33 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 3 | 23 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Missing | 28 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 3 | 10 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 4 | 21 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 0 | 113 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 0 | 72 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 1 | 14 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 2 | 15 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 3 | 24 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Missing | 11 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 1 | 74 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 2 | 34 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 3 | 8 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Missing | 8 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 0 | 16 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 0 | 36 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 1 | 3 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 0 | 5 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 0 | 32 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Missing | 3 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Missing | 9 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Missing | 9 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Anemia Grade 1 | 26 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 2 | 10 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Neutrophils count decreased Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 0 | 35 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 0 | 9 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Platelets count decreased Missing | 3 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | White blood cell decreased Missing | 3 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Maximum CTCAE Grade Laboratory Abnormality in Hematology Parameters | Lymphocytes count decreased Grade 3 | 9 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are those that first occur or increase in severity on or after the first dose and not more than 28 days after the last dose, and prior to the initiation of subsequent systemic anti-cancer therapy. An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
Time frame: From first dose of treatment (Day 1) till 28 days after last dose (Up to approximately 110 weeks)
Population: Safety Population included all the participants who received at least one dose of the study drug. Docetaxel arm do not include adverse events after initiation of crossover Adagrasib treatment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent SAE | 62 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment-Emergent SAE | 149 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 298 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment-Related TEAE | 280 Participants |
| Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment | 40 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment-Emergent SAE | 50 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 138 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment-Related TEAE | 121 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent SAE | 23 Participants |
| Docetaxel | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment | 25 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Treatment | 2 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment-Related Treatment-Emergent SAE | 7 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any TEAE | 44 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment-Emergent SAE | 20 Participants |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Any Treatment-Related TEAE | 41 Participants |
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review
Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the percent of participants documented to have a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions with the exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis \< 10 mm). All target lesions must be assessed. PR was defined as greater than or equal to 30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. All target lesions must be assessed. Disease progression was defined as 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy) with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm.
Time frame: From randomization till death or till disease progression or initiation of follow-up anti-cancer therapy or withdrawal of consent prior to minimum efficacy follow-up (up to 143 weeks)
Population: Intent-To-Treat Population includes all participants who are randomized into this study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review | 31.9 percentage of participants |
| Docetaxel | Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Per Blinded Independent Central Review | 9.2 percentage of participants |
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
Time frame: From randomization till death due to any cause (up to approximately 143 weeks)
Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib
Blood samples were collected for assessment of plasma concentration of Adagrasib. Data for participants for which the dose was reduced after receiving starting dose of 600 mg BID, based on physician decision is presented in separate arms.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Pre-Dose and Peak), Cycle 2 (Pre-Dose and Peak), Cycle 3 (Pre-Dose), Cycle 5 (Pre-Dose), Cycle 7 (Pre-Dose) (Each cycle is of 21 days)
Population: The PK evaluable population is defined as patients who received at least one dose of active study drug and had at least one blood sample collected to assess PK concentrations
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adagrasib | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 1 Day 1 Pre-Dose | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Adagrasib | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 1 Day 1 Peak | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Adagrasib | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-Dose | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Docetaxel | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 2 Day 1 Peak | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Docetaxel | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 7 Day 1 Pre-Dose | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 1 Day 1 Peak | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 7 Day 1 Pre-Dose | 1062.114 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 33.842 |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-Dose | 1579.040 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.432 |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 5 Day 1 Pre-Dose | 1114.046 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.3 |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 1 Day 1 Pre-Dose | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 2 Day 1 Peak | 2011.347 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.333 |
| Crossover Adagrasib | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 3 Day 1 Pre-Dose | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Adagrasib 600 mg QD | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 7 Day 1 Pre-Dose | 863.539 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.917 |
| Adagrasib 600 mg QD | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 3 Day 1 Pre-Dose | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Adagrasib 600 mg QD | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 2 Day 1 Peak | 2331.298 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59.515 |
| Adagrasib 600 mg QD | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-Dose | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Adagrasib 600 mg QD | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 1 Day 1 Pre-Dose | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Adagrasib 600 mg QD | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 1 Day 1 Peak | 556.963 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 63.55 |
| Adagrasib 600 mg QD | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 5 Day 1 Pre-Dose | 917.541 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 73.596 |
| Adagrasib 600 mg BID | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 7 Day 1 Pre-Dose | 1548.018 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41.166 |
| Adagrasib 600 mg BID | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 1 Day 1 Pre-Dose | NA nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | — |
| Adagrasib 600 mg BID | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 2 Day 1 Pre-Dose | 2097.813 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 67.912 |
| Adagrasib 600 mg BID | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 2 Day 1 Peak | 2117.333 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62.744 |
| Adagrasib 600 mg BID | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 3 Day 1 Pre-Dose | 1865.408 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42.93 |
| Adagrasib 600 mg BID | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 5 Day 1 Pre-Dose | 1459.470 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.094 |
| Adagrasib 600 mg BID | Plasma Concentration of Adagrasib | Cycle 1 Day 1 Peak | 518.944 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) | Geometric Coefficient of Variation 86.625 |