Skip to content

Effect & Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane vs IV Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children 3-17 Years Old

A Randomised Active-controlled Study to Compare Efficacy & Safety of Inhaled Isoflurane Delivered by the AnaConDa-S (Anaesthetic Conserving Device) vs IV Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Paediatric Patients 3-17 Years Old

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04684238
Acronym
IsoCOMFORT
Enrollment
94
Registered
2020-12-24
Start date
2021-01-14
Completion date
2023-01-19
Last updated
2025-05-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sedation

Keywords

sedation, isoflurane, mechanically ventilation, pediatric, midazolam

Brief summary

This is a study to compare safety and efficacy of inhaled isoflurane delivered by the AnaConDa-S (Anaesthetic Conserving Device (ACD)) versus intravenous midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated children admitted to an intensive care unit.

Detailed description

This is a phase III, multi-centre, prospective, randomized, active-controlled, assessor-blind study. Primary endpoint: percentage of time of adequately maintained sedation, in absence of rescue sedation, within the COMFORT-B interval (light, moderate, or deep sedation) prescribed at randomization, monitored every 2 hours for an expected minimum of 12 hours (up to 48 hours).

Interventions

DRUGMidazolam

Solution for Injection/Infusion

DRUGIsoflurane

Inhalation vapour, liquid. Isoflurane delivered by the AnaConDa-S (Anaesthetic Conserving Device)

Sponsors

Sedana Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients at least 3 years to 17 (less than 18) years at the time of randomization, admitted to an ICU/with planned ICU admission. * Expected mechanical (invasive) ventilation and sedation for at least 12 hours. * Informed consent obtained from the patient, patient's legal guardian(s)

Exclusion criteria

* Ongoing seizures requiring acute treatment. * Continuous sedation for more than 72 hours at time of randomization. * Less than 24 hours post cardiopulmonary resuscitation. * Uncompensated circulatory shock. * Known or suspected genetic susceptibility to malignant hyperthermia. * Patients with acute asthma or obstructive lung disease symptoms requiring treatment at inclusion. * Patient with tidal volume below 30 mL or above 800 mL. * Inability to perform reliable COMFORT-B assessment in the opinion of the Investigator * Patients with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring or with suspected increase in ICP * Patients with treatment-induced whole-body hypothermia. * Patients with pheochromocytoma. * Patients with prolonged QT interval or with significant risk for prolonged QT interval. * Patient not expected to survive next 48 hours or not committed to full medical care.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)Minimum of 12 hours up to 48 hours (± 6 hours).Percentage of time of adequately maintained sedation within the COMFORT-B interval (light, moderate or deep sedation) prescribed at randomisation, monitored every 2 h for a minimum of 12 h (up to 48 h ± 6 h)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare Time From End of Study Drug Administration to ExtubationFrom end of study drug administration to extubation or end of extubation attemptTime from end of study drug administration to extubation if study drug was terminated for extubation
Compare the Proportion of Time With Spontaneous BreathingFrom initiation of study drug treatment to End of study treatment (up to 48h +/- 6h)Proportion of observations with spontaneous breathing efforts during study treatment. This was a key secondary safety endpoint.
Evaluate Haemodynamic Effect as Indicated by Need for Additional Inotropic/Vasopressor AgentFrom start of study treatment to end of study treatment (up to 48h +/- 6h)Need for additional inotropic/vasopressor agent defined by change in Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) during study treatment period compared to baseline. The VIS quantifies the amount of cardiovascular support required by infants postoperatively according to the below calculation: VIS = dopamine (µg/kg/min) + dobutamine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × epinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × norepinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 10 × milrinone (µg/kg/min) + 10,000 × vasopressin (U/kg/min). An increased VIS score correlates to an increase in inotropic/vasopressor agents.
Evaluate the Number of Patients With Withdrawal SymptomFrom > 96 hours sedation (including pre-study sedation period) until the end of the 48-hour post study treatment monitoring or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.Evaluate the frequency of withdrawal symptoms in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients according to SOS-PD.
Evaluate the Frequency of DeliriumPatients admitted to the ICU ≥48 hours (including period prior to study enrolment) until the end of the 48-hour post study treatment monitoring or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.Evaluate the frequency of delirium in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients
Compare the Use of OpioidsFrom first blinded COMFORT-B assessment (at +2 h from start of study drug initiation) to end of the study treatment periodDose of opioids from first blinded COMFORT-B assessment (at +2 h from start of study drug) to end of study treatment period. This was a key secondary efficacy endpoint. Dose of opioids was expressed as fentanyl IV equivalents.
Compare the 30 Days/Hospital MortalityFrom start of study treatment up to 30 daysCompare the 30 days/hospital mortality in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients
Compare Ventilator-free DaysFrom start of study treatment up to 30 daysVentilator-free days at 30 days from start of study treatment period.
Compare the Time in ICU/HospitalFrom start of study treatment up to 30 daysCompare the time in ICU at 30 days from start of study treatment period. This was a secondary safety endpoint. Patients that were withdrawn prior to day 30 were excluded from the analysis. Patients who died before day 30 were not considered withdrawals. For these patients, the days in ICU until day of death were considered ICU days.
Compare ICU-free DaysFrom start of study treatment up to 30 daysCompare ICU-free days up to 30 days in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients.
Evaluate the Frequency of Neurological Symptoms or Psychomotor DysfunctionDuring study treatment and up to 48 hours after discontinuation of isoflurane and midazolamEvaluate the frequency of neurological symptoms or psychomotor dysfunction during and up to 48 hours after discontinuation of isoflurane and midazolam treatment, and the association with duration of treatment, and total exposure (MAC hours and midazolam doses) over time.

Countries

France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

96 patients were randomised in total, 2 patients randomised to isoflurane did not receive treatment and 3 patients receiving treatment did not complete (1 patient receiving isoflurane and 2 patients receiving midazolam)

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Drug: Midazolam
Midazolam for sedation in the ICU Midazolam: Solution for Injection/Infusion
33
Drug: Isoflurane
Volatile for sedation in the ICU Isoflurane: Inhalation vapour, liquid. Isoflurane delivered by the Sedaconda ACD-S device
61
Total94

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDrug: MidazolamDrug: IsofluraneTotal
Age, Customized
Adolescents (12-17 years)
5 Participants14 Participants19 Participants
Age, Customized
Children (2-11 years)
28 Participants47 Participants75 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants13 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants28 Participants41 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants20 Participants30 Participants
Height118.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.5
123.0 cm123.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
10 Participants18 Participants28 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants41 Participants63 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants23 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
20 Participants38 Participants58 Participants
Weight21.60 kg20.00 kg20.00 kg

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 331 / 61
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 3332 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 3319 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)

Percentage of time of adequately maintained sedation within the COMFORT-B interval (light, moderate or deep sedation) prescribed at randomisation, monitored every 2 h for a minimum of 12 h (up to 48 h ± 6 h)

Time frame: Minimum of 12 hours up to 48 hours (± 6 hours).

Population: Full Analysis set (FAS): The FAS included all randomised patients who received IMP and had at least a 6-hour sedation period and at least 3 blinded COMFORT-B-assessments. The FAS followed the intention-to-treat principle, i.e., patients were analysed according to the treatment group they were assigned to at randomisation. The main statistical analysis was performed on this population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Drug: MidazolamPercentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)62.37 Percentage of time
Drug: IsofluranePercentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)68.94 Percentage of time
95% CI: [-8.99, 22.13]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Percentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)

Percentage of time of adequately maintained sedation within the COMFORT-B interval (light, moderate or deep sedation) prescribed at randomisation, monitored every 2 h for a minimum of 12 h (up to 48 h ± 6 h)

Time frame: Minimum of 12 hours up to 48 hours (± 6 hours).

Population: The PP analysis set included all patients in the FAS without any major protocol deviation affecting the primary analysis. To be included in the PP analysis patients had to have been sedated for at least 12h (which was interpreted as 12 h of study sedative treatment from start of IMP), with at least 50% of the planned COMFORT-B assessments performed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Drug: MidazolamPercentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)65.57 Percentage of time
Drug: IsofluranePercentage of Time of Adequately Maintained Sedation Depth up to 48 Hours (± 6 Hours)70.91 Percentage of time
95% CI: [-10.48, 21.17]
Secondary

Compare ICU-free Days

Compare ICU-free days up to 30 days in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients.

Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days

Population: Safety analysis set (only patients not withdrawn prior to day 30). This was a secondary safety endpoint. Patients who died before day 30 were not considered withdrawals. For these patients, the days in ICU until day of death were considered ICU days.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug: MidazolamCompare ICU-free Days18.58 Number of days alive and not in the ICUStandard Deviation 10.26
Drug: IsofluraneCompare ICU-free Days20.35 Number of days alive and not in the ICUStandard Deviation 7.87
Secondary

Compare the 30 Days/Hospital Mortality

Compare the 30 days/hospital mortality in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients

Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Drug: MidazolamCompare the 30 Days/Hospital Mortality2 Participants
Drug: IsofluraneCompare the 30 Days/Hospital Mortality0 Participants
Secondary

Compare the Proportion of Time With Spontaneous Breathing

Proportion of observations with spontaneous breathing efforts during study treatment. This was a key secondary safety endpoint.

Time frame: From initiation of study drug treatment to End of study treatment (up to 48h +/- 6h)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Drug: MidazolamCompare the Proportion of Time With Spontaneous Breathing0.44 proportion of time
Drug: IsofluraneCompare the Proportion of Time With Spontaneous Breathing0.48 proportion of time
Comparison: Spontaneous breathing efforts. Results display a comparison between isoflurane and midazolam and are based on a mixed effects analysis of variance model with treatment group as fixed effect.p-value: 0.63695% CI: [-0.15, 0.25]ANOVA
Secondary

Compare the Time in ICU/Hospital

Compare the time in ICU at 30 days from start of study treatment period. This was a secondary safety endpoint. Patients that were withdrawn prior to day 30 were excluded from the analysis. Patients who died before day 30 were not considered withdrawals. For these patients, the days in ICU until day of death were considered ICU days.

Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days

Population: Safety analysis set (only patients not withdrawn prior to day 30)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug: MidazolamCompare the Time in ICU/Hospital10.21 Number of ICU daysStandard Deviation 9.13
Drug: IsofluraneCompare the Time in ICU/Hospital9.65 Number of ICU daysStandard Deviation 7.87
Secondary

Compare the Use of Opioids

Dose of opioids during the last 4 h of study treatment, as compared to the first 4 h of study treatment after first blinded COMFORT-B assessment. This was a key secondary efficacy endpoint. Dose of opioids is expressed as fentanyl IV equivalents.

Time frame: Last 4 hours of study treatment compared to first 4 hours of study treatment after first blinded COMFORT-B assessment (at +2 h from start of study drug initiation).

Population: FAS: Patients with 8 hours or more of study treatment from first blinded COMFORT-B assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Drug: MidazolamCompare the Use of Opioids0.58 μg/kg/h
Drug: IsofluraneCompare the Use of Opioids-0.19 μg/kg/h
p-value: 0.09695% CI: [-1.69, 0.14]ANCOVA
Secondary

Compare the Use of Opioids

Dose of opioids from first blinded COMFORT-B assessment (at +2 h from start of study drug) to end of study treatment period. This was a key secondary efficacy endpoint. Dose of opioids was expressed as fentanyl IV equivalents.

Time frame: From first blinded COMFORT-B assessment (at +2 h from start of study drug initiation) to end of the study treatment period

Population: The FAS included all randomised patients who received IMP and had at least a 6-hour sedation period and at least 3 blinded COMFORT-B-assessments. The FAS followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, i.e., patients were analysed according to the treatment group they were assigned to at randomisation.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Drug: MidazolamCompare the Use of Opioids4.6 μg/kg/h
Drug: IsofluraneCompare the Use of Opioids2.1 μg/kg/h
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-3.8, -1.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Compare Time From End of Study Drug Administration to Extubation

Time from end of study drug administration to extubation if study drug was terminated for extubation

Time frame: From end of study drug administration to extubation or end of extubation attempt

Population: Subgroup of patients with endotracheal tube where wake-up was initiated at end of study treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Drug: MidazolamCompare Time From End of Study Drug Administration to Extubation1.09 hour
Drug: IsofluraneCompare Time From End of Study Drug Administration to Extubation0.75 hour
Comparison: Time to extubationp-value: 0.002195% CI: [1.54, 7.07]Regression, Cox
Secondary

Compare Ventilator-free Days

Ventilator-free days at 30 days from start of study treatment period.

Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days

Population: Safety analysis set (only patients not withdrawn prior to day 30)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug: MidazolamCompare Ventilator-free Days22.55 Number of ventilator-free daysStandard Deviation 10.62
Drug: IsofluraneCompare Ventilator-free Days25.00 Number of ventilator-free daysStandard Deviation 6.74
Secondary

Evaluate Haemodynamic Effect as Indicated by Need for Additional Inotropic/Vasopressor Agent

Need for additional inotropic/vasopressor agent defined by change in Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS) during study treatment period compared to baseline. The VIS quantifies the amount of cardiovascular support required by infants postoperatively according to the below calculation: VIS = dopamine (µg/kg/min) + dobutamine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × epinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 100 × norepinephrine (µg/kg/min) + 10 × milrinone (µg/kg/min) + 10,000 × vasopressin (U/kg/min). An increased VIS score correlates to an increase in inotropic/vasopressor agents.

Time frame: From start of study treatment to end of study treatment (up to 48h +/- 6h)

Population: Safety analysis set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Drug: MidazolamEvaluate Haemodynamic Effect as Indicated by Need for Additional Inotropic/Vasopressor Agent≤24 hours5.4 Change from baseline in VISStandard Deviation 19.3
Drug: MidazolamEvaluate Haemodynamic Effect as Indicated by Need for Additional Inotropic/Vasopressor Agent>24 hours1.9 Change from baseline in VISStandard Deviation 9.7
Drug: IsofluraneEvaluate Haemodynamic Effect as Indicated by Need for Additional Inotropic/Vasopressor Agent≤24 hours3.4 Change from baseline in VISStandard Deviation 19.9
Drug: IsofluraneEvaluate Haemodynamic Effect as Indicated by Need for Additional Inotropic/Vasopressor Agent>24 hours8.8 Change from baseline in VISStandard Deviation 44.4
Comparison: Need for inotropic/vasopressor agent at ≤24 hours.p-value: 0.55Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Need for inotropic/vasopressor agent at \>24 hours.p-value: 0.637Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Evaluate the Frequency of Delirium

Evaluate the frequency of delirium in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients

Time frame: Patients admitted to the ICU ≥48 hours (including period prior to study enrolment) until the end of the 48-hour post study treatment monitoring or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Drug: MidazolamEvaluate the Frequency of Delirium5 Participants
Drug: IsofluraneEvaluate the Frequency of Delirium12 Participants
Secondary

Evaluate the Frequency of Neurological Symptoms or Psychomotor Dysfunction

Evaluate the frequency of neurological symptoms or psychomotor dysfunction during and up to 48 hours after discontinuation of isoflurane and midazolam treatment, and the association with duration of treatment, and total exposure (MAC hours and midazolam doses) over time.

Time frame: During study treatment and up to 48 hours after discontinuation of isoflurane and midazolam

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Drug: MidazolamEvaluate the Frequency of Neurological Symptoms or Psychomotor Dysfunction6 Participants
Drug: IsofluraneEvaluate the Frequency of Neurological Symptoms or Psychomotor Dysfunction16 Participants
Secondary

Evaluate the Number of Patients With Withdrawal Symptom

Evaluate the frequency of withdrawal symptoms in isoflurane- vs midazolam-treated patients according to SOS-PD.

Time frame: From > 96 hours sedation (including pre-study sedation period) until the end of the 48-hour post study treatment monitoring or ICU discharge, whichever comes first.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Drug: MidazolamEvaluate the Number of Patients With Withdrawal Symptom2 Participants
Drug: IsofluraneEvaluate the Number of Patients With Withdrawal Symptom3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026