Freezing of Gait
Conditions
Keywords
spinal cord stimulation, freezing of gait, Parkinson's disease, Parkinsonism-Plus syndrome
Brief summary
Spinal cord stimulation may be a new therapeutic approach for freezing of gait. It's a multi-center, prospective, open label clinical study with a 12 months follow-up period, to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation for freezing of gait in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and Parkinsonism-Plus syndrome.
Detailed description
Benefits of dopaminergic therapy and deep brain stimulation are limited for freezing of gait in Parkinson's syndrome. Spinal cord stimulation is a well-established therapy for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain. Recently, some pilot studies demonstrated the safety and significant therapeutic effect of Spinal cord stimulation in freezing of gait patients suffering from various movement disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, primary progressive freezing of gait, and multiple system atrophy with predominant Parkinsonism. Spinal cord stimulation may be a new therapeutic approach for freezing of gait. However, evidence from larger numbers of subjects is still lacking, especially little is known about its efficacy for gait and posture dysfunction in Parkinsonism-Plus syndrome patients. The objective of this study is to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation for freezing of gait in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and Parkinsonism-Plus syndrome. It's a multi-center, prospective, open label clinical study with a 12 months follow-up period. The intended study population is individuals suffering from advanced Parkinson's disease, multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonism or progressive supranuclear palsy. Each participant will complete an enrollment/screening/baseline visit, a spinal cord stimulation implant and activation visit, and a minimum of two follow-up visits, including visit at 3 months and the final study visit at 12months. The participants will proceed to implantation after satisfying implant inclusion and exclusion criteria. Paddle-shaped Spinal cord stimulation electrode with 16 contacts (AdaptiveStim® 39, 565; Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) will be implanted into the epidural space at the thoracic levels ranging from T10 to T12. Electrode position will be verified by X-ray. The stimulators will be turned on within 1 month after electrode implantation surgery. The stimulation parameters could vary freely, but medications will be kept constant during the study period. At the end of month 12, participants will enter the long-term follow-up in which medications and stimulation parameters could vary freely.
Interventions
PROCEDURESpinal cord stimulation
Paddle-shaped Spinal cord stimulation electrode with 16 contacts (AdaptiveStim® 39, 565; Medtronic, USA) will be implanted into the epidural space at the thoracic levels ranging from T10 to T12.
Sponsors
zhangyuqing
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 76 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. aged between 40 and 76 years 2. patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, or multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonism or progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) 3. with significant freezing of gait ( Movement Disorder Society Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III item 11≥2), and the gait dysfunction treatable by medication but not adequately controlled with medications. 4. Understand potential risk/benefit, consent to the study, study procedures, and agree to complete the study follow-up visits and comply with the study protocol requirements.
Exclusion criteria
1. cognitive impairment ( MMSE≤24), depression (HAMD\>24),acute psychosis, active alcohol or drug abuse, terminal illness, and any major medical or psychological histories, diagnoses, conditions, or comorbidities that would interfere with participation in the study per the investigatior's medical judgment 2. surgical or medical contraindications to spinal cord stimulation surgery(e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, advanced coronary artery disease).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| change in severity of freezing of gait | twelve months after surgery | demonstrate statistically significant improvement in score of New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOGQ) from baseline to 12 months |
| change in the score of Gait and Fall Questionnaire (GFQ) | twelve months after surgery. | demonstrate statistically significant improvement in score of GFQ from baseline to 12 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| change in PD-related quality of life(PDQ-39) | twelve months after surgery. | demonstrate statistically significant improvement in PD-related quality of life(PDQ-39) from baseline to 12 months |
| change in motor examination( Movement Disorders Society's revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) III) | twelve months after surgery. | demonstrate the change in motor score (MDS-UPDRS III) from baseline( Off medication) to 12 months (On stimulation/Off medication) |
| Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-GI) | twelve months after surgery. | to evaluate effectiveness on the basis of the physician's assessment, as well as on the basis of the patients'self-reported satisfaction. It is rated on a 7-point scale, range from 1(very much improved) through to 7 (very much worse) |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactJiping Li, MD
Backup ContactShanshan Mei, MD
Outcome results
None listed