Skip to content

Analysis of Linked Health Insurance Claims and Clinical Registries to Determine Device Surveillance With Paclitaxel-coated Medical Devices

GermanVasc/MDEpiNet Paclitaxel Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04683458
Acronym
PacliVasc
Enrollment
14000
Registered
2020-12-24
Start date
2021-01-31
Completion date
2021-02-28
Last updated
2021-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Paclitaxel Adverse Reaction, Outcome, Fatal

Keywords

Paclitaxel, Health Insurance Claims, Real-World Data, Quality Improvement

Brief summary

The GermanVasc/MDEpiNet Paclitaxel Study, aims to use routinely collected data from health insurance claims and registries. The longitudinal data of Germany's second-largest insurance fund, BARMER, includes the outpatient and inpatient medical care provided to ≈9.4 million German citizens (13.2% of Germany's population) involving \>21 million hospitalizations between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018. The BARMER cohort is similar to Western European countries and has been widely used for research projects. A regular random sample validation of internal and external validity is performed by the Medical Service of the Health Funds in Germany, and various peer-reviewed validation studies have been previously published. The GermanVasc clinical registry was implemented in 2018 as EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliant registry platform to process routinely collected clinical data from more than 35 high-volume vascular centers in Germany. In an ongoing project of a large multispecialty and multidisciplinary research consortium (RABATT study, Principal Investigator: PD Dr. Christian-Alexander Behrendt), active surveillance and medical device evaluation methods were developed. The current study aims to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloons and stents in peripheral arteries. It further aims to illuminate the underlying differences between the cohorts in randomized controlled trials (RCT) and real-world data that can possibly explain the diametrically opposed results in an ongoing international controversy.

Interventions

The endovascular (intraluminal) application of a medical-device that was coated with paclitaxel

Sponsors

GermanVasc
CollaboratorOTHER
BARMER
CollaboratorOTHER
MDEpiNet Verband Deutschland e.V.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Fontaine stage II-IV * Diabetic foot syndrome with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia * Endovascular revascularisation procedure in the lower limbs * Treatment between 2013 and 2017

Exclusion criteria

* Hybrid surgery * Previous major amputation * Previous cancer diagnosis * Previous paclitaxel-exposure * Previous percutaneous coronary intervention * Previous revascularisation of the arteries in the lower limbs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Target limb revascularization after 5-years5-years
All-cause mortality after 5-years5-years
Composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke after 5-years5-years
Composite of all-cause mortality and major amputation of the lower extremities after 5-years5-years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Incident cancer after 5-years5-years
Minor amputation of the target limb after 5-years5-years
Major amputation of the target limb after 5-years5-years
Rate of optimal pharmacological treatment with antithrombotics, antihypertensives, and lipid-lowering drugs1-year

Contacts

Primary ContactChristian-Alexander Behrendt, PD Dr.
ch.behrendt@uke.de+4940741018087

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026