Skip to content

Effect of Metoclopramide Versus Erythromycin on on Gastric Residual Volume

Comparison of the Effect of Metoclopramide Versus Erythromycin on Gastric Residual Volume

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04682691
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-12-24
Start date
2021-03-01
Completion date
2024-02-22
Last updated
2025-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Residual Volume

Keywords

Erythromycin, Gastric Emptying, Metoclopramide, Ultrasonography

Brief summary

In emergencies, it may be necessary to anaesthetize who are not fully starved and consequently at risk of pulmonary aspiration. Pregnancy are recognized to be at increased risk of aspiration compared with non-pregnancy. Prokinetic agents such as metoclopramide can be used to reduce GRV. Metoclopramide is widely used as a prokinetic agent in adults and is licensed for premedication in pregnancy, but its use may be limited by its potential for producing extrapyramidal side effects. Erythromycin is an effective prokinetic agent in adults but there is no work examining its use for premedication in pregnancy. This study compared the effects of erythromycin and metoclopramide on GRV in full-term pregnant women

Interventions

DRUGErythromycin (400mg)

oral Erythromycin (400mg)

oral metoclopramide (10mg)

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTnaturally flavored water

naturally flavored water

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non-laboring pregnant women ≥36 weeks gestational age * Parturient scheduled for elective caesarian delivery. * Singleton pregnancy * Age greater than 18 years * Having followed institutional fasting guidelines (a minimum of 2 h for clear fluids, 6 h for a light meal, and 8 h for a meal that included fried or fatty food) 2\.

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal of the patient * Deviation from fasting times * Patients with empty stomach * Emergency operation * Body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2 * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class III, IV. * Gestational diabetes mellitus * Multiple gestations * Patients with polyhydramnios liquor. * Preeclampsia patients * Chronic kidney disease patients * Systemic diseases may cause delayed gastric emptying (eg: myopathies and myasthenia gravis). * Patients with gastrointestinal diseases such as hiatus hernia, intestinal disease and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and patients with history of upper gastrointestinal surgeries. * Patients on antidepressants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors * Use of other medications known to affect gastric motility or secretions. * Allergy to macrolide or metoclopramide

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Estimated Gastric volumeUP TO 6 HOURE(ml/kg) after a six-hour fast using Roukhomovsky's equation after administration of the study drug.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
low-risk stomach six hours after drug administrationup to 6 hoursnumber of patient and %
Perlas grading systemUP TO 24 HOUREGrade 0 antrum: absent fluid content in both supine and RLD positions Grade 1 antrum: fluid is observed only in the RLD position, but not in the supine position Grade 2 antrum: fluid is observed in both supine and RLD
Evaluation of the risk of aspirationUP TO 24 HOUREresidual gastric volume \< 1.5 mL/kg
quantitative gastric contentsup to 24 hoursevery one hours estimated GV till ( \< 1.5 ml/kg) post-drug administration

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026