Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation

A Double-blind Crossover Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Delivered Through AlphaDBS System in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04681534
Enrollment
15
Registered
2020-12-23
Start date
2021-01-26
Completion date
2025-12-30
Last updated
2024-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess the safety and the potential efficacy of personalized Local Field Potential (LFP)-based adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation (aDBS), using the implantable pulse generator (IPG) of the AlphaDBS System, in Parkinson's Disease patients, chronically implanted in subthalamic nucleus (STN) for DBS.

Detailed description

The study protocol is organized in two phases: the short-term follow-up and the long-term follow-up. PD patients in need of IPG replacement or de novo DBS patients will be screened for enrollment eligibility. For the short-term follow-up, randomized patients will undergo 2 days of experimental sessions (i.e. one per each type of stimulation mode, cDBS and aDBS), in a well-controlled environment (i.e. during hospitalization). This part of the study will collect information on safety and potential efficacy endpoints as assessed by experienced neurologists. The short term follow-up phase will be considered complete when the endpoint assessment has been performed for all patients. Patients, who will not experience severe side effects and who will be deemed suitable by the neurologist, will be eligible to continue in the long-term follow-up phase (i.e. 1 month) in their home environment. The AlphaDBS System will deliver the stimulation in aDBS or cDBS mode, for two weeks in each mode.

Interventions

DEVICEAlphaDBS System

AlphaDBS can be programmed with two different types of stimulation: conventional DBS and adaptive DBS, that automatically adjusts the energy delivered to patient using a biosignal, local field potential (LFP), in a close loop configuration.

Sponsors

Newronika
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

IPG Replacement Patients: Inclusion Criteria 1. Diagnosis of idiopathic PD; 2. Subject is bilaterally treated with DBS in the STN using a Medtronic Activa PC or Activa RC IPG (mono-channnel or dual channel); 3. DBS implant for at least 3 years and in need of battery replacement within 12 months after consent; 4. Patients must be able to understand and sign the informed consent document.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with severe cognitive decline, as resulting from MoCA assessment (MoCA score \< 10); 2. Patients with major psychiatric issues or any other condition that, based on the physician opinion, could interfere with the study conduct (e.g. severe depression, psychosis, etc.); 3. Patients with any medical conditions potentially interfering with DBS battery replacement surgery (e.g. severe hypertension, active cancer, intake of drugs interfering with the coagulation etc.); 4. Need to replace or reposition the leads during the IPG replacement procedure; 5. Patients with \> 10 recurrent falls experienced in the 3 months prior to consent; 6. Patients that cannot tolerate an interruption of DBS stimulation for at least 30 min; 7. Patients taking less than one levodopa dose per day; 8. Patients without suitable LFPs recordings or with significant artifacts; 9. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. De Novo DBS Patients: Inclusion Criteria 1. Patient is ≥ 18 years old; 2. Patient has been diagnosed with levodopa-responsive idiopathic Parkinson's disease for ≥ 5 years; 3. The disease stage is II, III or IV according to the Hoehn and Yahr scale 4. Patient has history of improvement of PD-related symptoms as a direct result of levodopa intake; 5. Patient has been selected for bilateral STN or GPi DBS, independently from this study, in accordance with local standard of care DBS screening; 6. Patient has been selected to receive Medtronic leads model 3389 or 37086 or Abbott directional leads model number 6170 or 6172 or 6371, independently from this study, in accordance with local standard of care for DBS; 7. Patient has DBS-leads circuit integrity assessed and confirmed by impedance testing, before IPG implantation; 8. MoCA score \> 26 in best medical condition; 9. BDI-II score \< 17 in best medical condition; 10. UPDRS-III improvement by ≥ 33% with levodopa challenge test (at approximately 90 min from the intake of the usual morning levodopa dose plus 30%); 11. Patient is able to understand the study requirements and the treatment procedures and has provided written informed consent to participate; 12. Patient has a responsible caregiver who will help completing the 3-day diary, provide feedback on activities of daily living (ADL), and ensure the patient complies with visit schedule; 13. Patient is on stable PD-medication for one month prior surgery; 14. Patient is willing and able to attend all study-required visits, complete the study procedures and attend appropriate follow up visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety and tolerability of the AlphaDBS System, when used in cDBS and aDBS mode1 monthOccurrence of device related adverse events

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dyskinesia1 monthEvaluation of dyskinesia and their fluctuations through repeated clinical assessments using the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale - UDysRS
Time on with and without dyskinesia1 monthEvaluation of time on with and without dyskinesia, assessed through Patient Diary
Time off1 monthEvaluation of time off, assessed through Patient Diary
PD-related motor symptoms and their fluctuations1 monthEvaluation of PD-related motor symptoms using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - UPDRS Part III.
Usability of the system for the physician1 monthUsability will be evaluated by means of a usability questionnaire
Change in the TEED to the patient1 monthChange in the Total Electrical Energy Delivered (TEED) to the patient
Patient controller usability1 monthUsability will be evaluated by means of a usability questionnaire

Countries

Italy, Netherlands, Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactCostanza Conti, PhD
costanza.conti@newronika.com+39 02 84 109 381

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026