Hearing Loss
Conditions
Brief summary
Background: Reminding people they are moral adaptable human beings (self-affirming) reduces the perceived stigma associated with wearing hearing aids and increases actual hearing aid use. The proposed study aims to reduce stigma in a representative sample of people aged over 60 from the general population who may or may not already be wearing hearing aids and improve multiple hearing health outcomes (e.g., attending screening, device use). Methods/Design: Double-blinded randomized controlled trial in which a representative sample of people aged over 60 from the general population will be asked to complete surveys about hearing stigma, hearing loss and multiple hearing health outcomes. Participants randomized to the control group will only complete the survey; participants in the intervention group will be asked to affirm their values. Six months later, all participants will complete the same survey to assess outcomes. Discussion: The proposed research will lead to a brief psychological intervention to reduce stigma in relation to hearing loss/aids.
Detailed description
According to self-affirmation theory, defensiveness arises because people are motivated to defend their global sense of self-worth, which in the present case is threatened by perceptions of hearing aids/loss. However, if a person's self-image can be bolstered (affirmed) in a domain that is important to them, thereby preserving self-integrity, the individual should be less likely to process the threatening (i.e., stigmatizing in the present context) information defensively. Accumulated empirical evidence demonstrates that affirming the self: (a) reduces public stigma, (b) reduces self-stigma, and (c) causes meaningful changes in behaviour. Following a pilot-feasibility trial showing that self-affirming caused significant reductions in first-time hearing aid users' anxieties about ageing and increased their hearing aid use by almost 2 hours/day.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALSelf-affirmation
According to self-affirmation theory (Steele, 1988), defensiveness arises because people are motivated to defend their global sense of self-worth, which in the present case is threatened by perceptions of hearing aids/loss. However, if a person's self-image can be bolstered (affirmed) in a domain that is important to them, thereby preserving self-integrity, the individual should be less likely to process the threatening (i.e., stigmatizing in the present context) information defensively (Steele, 1988).
Sponsors
University of Manchester
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* UK-based adults * Aged 60+
Exclusion criteria
* Adults younger than 60 years * Not UK-based
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hearing aid self-stigma | 6 months | Self-report questionnaire comprising nine items on 7-point Likert-type scales where 1 = low stigma and 7 = high stigma |
| Hearing loss public stigma | 6 months | Self-report questionnaire comprising seven items on 7-point Likert-type scales where 1 = low stigma and 7 = high stigma |
| Hearing aid public stigma | 6 months | Self-report questionnaire comprising seven items on 7-point Likert-type scales where 1 = low stigma and 7 = high stigma |
| Hearing loss self-stigma | 6 months | Self-report questionnaire comprising five items on 7-point Likert-type scales where 1 = low stigma and 7 = high stigma |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Anxiety about ageing | 6 months | Self-report questionnaire comprising three items on 7-point Likert-type scales where 1 = low anxiety and 7 = high anxiety |
| Hearing health seeking behaviours | 6 months | Self-report questionnaire comprising eighteen items on no-yes scales where 0 = no and 1 = yes |
| Spontaneous self-affirmation | 6 months | Self-report questionnaire comprising two items on 4-point Likert-type scales where 1 = low spontaneous self-affirmation and 4 = high spontaneous self-affirmation |
| Subjective well-being | 6 months | Self-report questionnaire comprising four items on 11-point Likert-type scales where 0 = low subjective well-being and 10 = high subjective well-being |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Impact of Covid-19 | 6 months | Self-report questionnaire comprising fifteen items on 4-point Likert-type scales where 1 = low impact and 4 = high impact |
Countries
United Kingdom
Outcome results
None listed