Skip to content

OPTIMIzation of Treatment SElection and Follow up in Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer

OPTIMIzation of Treatment SElection and Follow up in Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer - a ctDNA Guided Phase II Randomized Approach

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04680260
Acronym
OPTIMISE
Enrollment
350
Registered
2020-12-22
Start date
2021-10-25
Completion date
2030-03-01
Last updated
2024-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer, Metastatic Cancer

Keywords

Circulating tumor DNA, Adjuvant chemotherapy, Colorectal cancer, Metastatic

Brief summary

A study investigating if analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can guide adjuvant treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC)

Detailed description

An open label 1:1 randomized phase II exploratory study investigating use of ctDNA-guided adjuvant chemotherapy compared to standard of care (SOC) after local treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients are randomized 1:1 between SOC and ctDNA guided treatment and follow-up. Escalation therapy comprises standard regimen of Fluorouracil (5-FU), Irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI), de-escalation therapy of monotherapy capecitabine or observation only. SOC is per institutional practice, based on national guidelines.

Interventions

OTHERStandard of care

Patients will be offered adjuvant chemotherapy according to standard of care. Follow up will be performed with imaging according to standard guidelines, equal to the experimental arm. Blood samples will be analyzed retrospectively to evaluate the ctDNA status.

OTHERCirculating tumor DNA guided treatment approach

Circulating tumor-marker positivity will lead to escalation with 6 months of intensified chemotherapy consisting of 4 months of FOLFOXIRI followed by 2 months of 5FU monotherapy. Circulating tumor-marker negativity will based on shared decision-making lead to de-escalation i.e. possibilities for observation in patients otherwise eligible for monotherapy or observation/monotherapy in patients, otherwise eligible for combination chemotherapy according to standard of care.

Sponsors

Vejle Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Zealand University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Karen-Lise Garm Spindler
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

An open label 1:1 randomized phase II exploratory study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Radical intended treatment for metastatic spread from CRC, by resection, radiofrequency ablation, stereotactic body radiation therapy (or other experimental local treatment options) not including cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) * No evidence of further disease based on pre-treatment work-up according to SOC * Age at least 18 years * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 * Clinically eligible for adjuvant triple CT at investigators decision. * Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function allowing systemic chemotherapy (Absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5x109/l and thrombocytes ≥ 100x109/l. Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper normal value and alanine aminotransferase ≤ 3 x upper normal value, and calculated or measured renal glomerular filtration rate at least 30 mL/min) * Anticonception for fertile women and for male patients with a fertile partner. Intrauterine device, vasectomy of a female subject's male partner or hormonal contraceptive are acceptable * Written and verbally informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Radiological evidence of distant metastasis, by CT- chest, abdomen, and pelvis * Incapacity, frailty, disability and comorbidity to a degree that according to the investigator is not compatible with triple combination chemotherapy * Neuropathy National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) grade \> 1 * Other malignant tumor within 5 years except non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ cervicis uteri * Pregnant (positive pregnancy test) or breast feeding women * Intolerance or allergy to 5FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan or capecitabine

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence Free Rate2 yearsRate of patients free from recurrent colorectal cancer at 2 years post local treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Toxicity of treatment6 months post-treatmentRate of grade 3-4 toxicity according to CTCAE version 5
Molecular biological response to therapy6 months post-treatmentRate of patients with lack of detectable tumor DNA in plasma samples
Molecular biological Disease Free Survival1 year from inclusionRate of patients with no detectable ctDNA
Time to molecular biological recurrence5 years last patientTime to molecular biological recurrence is calculated from first time of no detectable DNA until detectable DNA in a samples
Time to radiological recurrence5 years last patientTime to radiological recurrence is calculated from inclusion until radiological evidence of disease recurrence
Local and distant relapse5 years last patientRate of patients with local and distant relapse
Overall survival5 years last patientTime from inclusion to death from any cause
Quality of life according to EORTC QLQ-CR29 and -C305 years last patientThe EORTC QLQ-CR29 is a tumor-specific health related QoL questionnaire module for CRC patients, which complement the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Patients indicate their symptoms during the past week(s). Scores can be linearly transformed to a score from 0-100. Higher scores represent better functioning on the functional scales and a higher level of symptoms on the symptom scales.
Quality of life according to EQ-5D-5L5 years last patientThe EQ-5D-5L essentially consists of: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale. The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions. Each dimension has 5 levels. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the 5 dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale.
Cost-effectiveness analysis5 years last patientEconomic evaluation of ctDNA guided chemotherapy after curative treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactKaren-Lise G Spindler, Professor
k.g.spindler@rm.dk+4591167244

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026