Skip to content

Superficial Cryotherapy Versus Microneedling in Alopecia Areata

Comparative Study Between the Effect of Superficial Cryotherapy Using Dimethyl Ether and Propane Mixture and Microneedling in Treatment of Alopecia Areata

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04680234
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-12-22
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2020-06-01
Last updated
2020-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alopecia Areata

Keywords

alopecia areata, Microneedling, Cryotherapy

Brief summary

This study is randomized comparative analytical prospective study that included patients with mild and moderate alopecia areata. Patients was divided into two groups Patients in the first group underwent Superficial cryotherapy using dimethyl ether and propane (DMEP) at -57C (Cryotherapy group). Patients in the second group underwent Microneedling (Microneedling group). A total of six sessions were done at 2 weeks interval. Patients were followed-up for next 3 months to evaluate the persistence of hair regrowth after therapy. Patients were assessed at baseline and during follow up using photography, Dermoscopy, SALT score and regrowth scale.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDMEP kit

Superficial Cryotherapy using dimethyl ether and propane (DMEP) at -57C

DEVICEDermapen

Under aseptic precautions, the dermapen was moved on the alopecic patches diagonally, vertically and horizontally 4 to 5 times in each direction Pin point bleeding was taken as an end point

Sponsors

Sohag University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients will be divided into two groups (randomly assigned and comparably cross matched for age and sex) Cryotherapy group (No.= 50): Superficial cryotherapy using dimethyl ether and propane (DMEP) at -57C Microneedling group (No. = 50): Microneedling

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ِAlopecia areata patients

Exclusion criteria

* Alopecia totalis and universalis * ِAge less than four years. * ِPregnancy or breast-feeding. * ِActive infection at the site alopecia patch(s). * ِInflammation ate site of the alopecia patches * ِIntolerance to cold. * ِAssociated systemic illness such as thyroid, pernicious anaemia, diabetes mellitus, autoimmune connective tissue diseases. * ِPrevious treatment for alopecia areata over the last three months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Regrowth ScaleChange in regrowth scale from baseline to 3 months follow after end of sessions0 score (regrowth \< 10%) no response 1. score (regrowth 11-25%) poor response 2. score (regrowth 26-50%) fair response 3. score (regrowth 51-75%) satisfactory response 4. score (regrowth ≥ 75%) excellent response.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SALT scoreChange in salt score from baseline to 3 months follow after end of sessionsSALT score is the sum of the percentage of hair loss in all the abovementioned areas. For example, if the percentage hair loss in vertex, right profile, left profile, and posterior aspect is 20, 30, 40, and 50% respectively; then, SALT score = (20 × 0.4) = (30 × 0.18) + (40 × 0.18) + (50 × 0.24) = 8 + 5.4 + 7.2 + 12 = 32.6.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026