Skip to content

I-gel vs AuraGain for Bronchoscopic Intubation Through SGA

I-gel Versus AuraGain for Bronchoscopic Intubation Through Supraglottic Airway Device - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04680169
Enrollment
100
Registered
2020-12-22
Start date
2021-01-18
Completion date
2021-05-04
Last updated
2021-06-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management

Keywords

Intubation, Bronchoscopic, Supraglottic airway device, I-gel, AuraGain, Flexible, Fiberoptic

Brief summary

This trial compares two different second generation supraglottic airway devices (AuraGain and I-gel) used as a conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation during continuous oxygenation in order tο determine time to successful tracheal intubation and ease of use.

Detailed description

A prospective randomized controlled trial in the Department of Anesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Nordsjællands Hospital-Hillerød Denmark. The study is approved by the Ethics Committee, capital region of Denmark. The aim of the study is to compare bronchoscopic tracheal intubation during continuous oxygenation through the AuraGain and I-gel supraglottic airway device. One hundred patients will be randomly allocated into two groups, group A (AuraGain) and group B (I-gel). Study outcomes are time to tracheal intubation confirmed by capnography as well as anesthesiologists reports of ease of use. Twenty-five anesthesiologists participates in this study, and are allocated four patient each. In random order, each physician will perform two bronchoscopic tracheal intubations with each SGA. In the preoperative setting, a complete anesthetic evaluation will be performed, including a detailed airway assessment determining predictors for difficulties of face mask ventilation, insertion of SGA and tracheal intubation. Participants are scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia. Before induction, all patients will be preoxygenated with 100% oxygen. After induction, rocuronium 0.6mg/kg will be used to facilitate neuromuscular blockade. Sufficient face mask ventilation will be performed before intervention. Group A: AuraGain: Time is measured from when the anesthesiologist reaches for the AuraGain LMA until the mask is placed and adequate ventilation is confirmed by capnography. The AuraGain LMA will be used as conduit for bronchoscopic intubation during continuous oxygenation, and time is measured until placement of the tracheal tube verified by capnography. Group B: I-gel: Time is measured from when the anesthesiologist reaches for the I-gel LMA until the mask is placed and adequate ventilation is confirmed by capnography.The I-gel LMA will be used as conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation during continuous oxygenation, and time is measured until placement of the tracheal tube verified by capnography. In both groups (A and B) up to two attempts of SGA placement and up to three attempts of tracheal intubation are allowed. In case of an emerging unpredicted difficult airway and a concurrent unsuccessful SGA placement, the difficult airway algorithm, DAS, UK will be followed. Video- assisted laryngoscopy will be the first option.

Interventions

DEVICEBronchoscopic intubation through AuraGain LMA

Comparing two different SGAs as conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation

DEVICEBronchoscopic intubation through I-gel SGA

Comparing two different SGAs as conduit for bronchoscopic tracheal intubation

Sponsors

Nordsjaellands Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for a non-acute ENT, gynaecological, gastrointestinal or orthopaedic surgical procedure for which general anaesthesia including oral intubation with an endotracheal tube will be provided

Exclusion criteria

* Age\<18 years * Inter-incisional distance \<30mm * Pregnant and BMI\>40kg/m2 * ASA physical status classification system grade \>3 * Earlier laryngeal or pharyngeal surgery * Increased risk of aspiration (e.g. nasogastric tube inserted, planned Rapid Sequence Induction) * Informed consent cannot be obtained * Patients with stridor * Patients with hypoxemia defines by saturation \<90 without oxygen at arrival to the operating room * Use of oxygen supply at home * Need of one of the following special endotracheal tubes for scheduled surgery: neural integrity monitor (NIM) electromyogram (EMG) tracheal tubes, wire tubes * Patients scheduled for any awake approach to secure the airway e.g. awake videolaryngoscopy, awake fiberoptic bronchoscope intubation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total time for airway managementUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthsTotal time from reaching the SGA with hands to ended bronchoscopic tracheal intubation confirmed by the end of first curve on capnography

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to placement of SGAUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthsTime measured from reaching SGA with hands to correct placement of SGA confirmed by end of first curve on capnography
Time to trans-device tracheal intubationUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthstime measured from confirmed placement of SGA until successful tracheal intubation confirmed by end of first curve on capnography
Number of attempts needed for correct placement of SGAUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthstwo attempts at correct placement allowed. Attempt is failed if no curve appears on capnography.
Number of attempts needed for correct intubationUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthsAttempt of bronchoscopic intubation begins when entering aScope in swivel. Attempt is failed if airway is not visualised, if tracheal tube can not be advanced in trachea, if SpO2 is \<85% or if total time exceeds 6 minutes. Three attempts of intubation is allowed.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reason for failed intubationUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthsif failed (as described in outcome 4), reason of failure is described
Best Brimacombe scoreUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthsClass 1: Unable to see the vocal cords. Class 2: the vocal cords and the anterior aspect of the epiglottis are visualized. Class 3: the vocal cords and the posterior aspect of the epiglottis are observed. Grade 4: only vocal cords were observed.
Feeling of resistance during tracheal intubationUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthsPhysician will be asked to report resistance as: none, mild, severe, impossible
Feasibility of SGA placementUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthsPhysician will be asked to report feasibility at a scale 1-10, 1=easy, 10=very difficult
Feasibility of intubationUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthsPhysician will be asked to report feasibility at a scale 1-10, 1=easy, 10=very difficult
Feasibility of total airway managementUp to study completion, an average of 4 monthsPhysician will be asked to report feasibility of the whole procedure at a scale 1-10, 1=easy, 10=very difficult

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026