Skip to content

Acetazolamide Efficacy in Ataxia in PMM2-CDG

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating Acetazolamide Efficacy in Ataxia in PMM2-CDG

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04679389
Enrollment
25
Registered
2020-12-22
Start date
2021-03-17
Completion date
2024-01-24
Last updated
2025-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CDG1A, Pmm2-CDG

Brief summary

Objective 1 (Primary): To determine the efficacy of acetazolamide in improving ataxia in patients with PMM2-CDG. Objective 2 (Secondary): To evaluate for any adverse events related to longer term acetazolamide administration. Objective 3 (Secondary): To examine the effect of acetazolamide on PMM2 biomarkers including carbohydrate deficient transferrin results, electrolytes (Na, K, Cl, CO2), VBG (pH, pCO2, PO2, CO2, Base excess), liver function tests (AST, ALT, GGT, indirect and direct bilirubin, total protein, albumin, alkaline phosphatase), kidney function tests (BUN, Creatinine, Urinalysis, urine calcium/creatinine ratio, urine protein/creatinine ratio), growth (height, weight, head circumference), vital signs (blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate), PROMIS scores, dysarthria using the PATA score, and NPCRS score. Objective 4 (Secondary): To explore characteristics of individuals with PMM2-CDG who do not respond to acetazolamide.

Detailed description

This study is double-blind, placebo-controlled, 1:1 randomized clinical therapeutic trial of acetazolamide for the treatment of ataxia in patients with PMM2-CDG. Clinical history and screening data will be reviewed to determine subject eligibility. Potential subjects who have a molecularly and/or biochemical confirmed diagnosis of PMM2-CDG will be consented. Baseline data will be collected prior to randomization and at treatment initiation. Subjects who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be enrolled into the study. Each subject who meets all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria will then be randomized to placebo or acetazolamide. They will be administered weight-dependent doses of acetazolamide or an equivalent volume of placebo twice daily by mouth. Initial dose of acetazolamide is 8 mg/kg/day if subjects are taking the liquid formulation, or as per Table 1b if they are taking the capsule formulation. If taking the liquid formulation, the dose of study drug will be increased by 7 mg/kg/day to a maximum of 22 mg/kg/day (not to exceed 1000 mg/day) if well tolerated with no treatment related SAEs or abnormal pH. If the pH is \<7.32, the dose will be reduced by 7 mg/kg/day. The dose will be adjusted similarly according to Table 1b if taking the capsule formulation. Subjects will be randomized after Visit 1, will initiate blinded therapy within the first week, and will continue on prescribed/adjusted blinded treatment until Visit 4. Of note, the concentration of the liquid formulation and the amount of milligrams of acetazolamide per capsule will stay constant, and the volume or number of capsules will be adjusted based on tolerance as assessed by symptoms and laboratories. If an individual is randomized to the placebo arm, the initial volume will be equivalent to 7 mg/kg/day or the initial number of capsules as per Table 1, and volume or number of capsules will also be adjusted based on symptoms and laboratory values each time dose adjustment is planned. Open label period will then begin after Visit 4 up to Visit 9 (see Figure 1 and Table 3). As both the subject and investigator do not know if the subject received placebo or acetazolamide, the dose of acetazolamide will be started at Visit 4 at 8 mg/kg/day and titrated upwards in the same manner in Visits 5 and 6 (remote) as in Visits 2 and 3 (remote). Subjects will have the option to withdraw from the study any time after Visit 4 if they do not wish to proceed onto or continue with the open label phase.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

administered orally or enterally

DRUGAcetazolamide

administered orally or enterally

Sponsors

Seattle Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
CollaboratorOTHER
Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double blind

Intervention model description

Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, with optional extension period

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Molecularly and/or enzymatically-confirmed PMM2-CDG, * Age ≥4 years old, and * Affected with ataxia evidenced by mini International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (Mini-ICARS) score \>0 at baseline.

Exclusion criteria

* Hepatic impairment defined as AST/ALT \>5x ULN in the last 12 months * Renal impairment defined as serum creatinine: \> 0.5 mg/dL (\<6 years); \> 0.7 mg/dL (7-10 years); \> 1.24 mg/dL (\> 11 years)- Hypersensitivity to acetazolamide * Hypersensitivity to any of the components of the placebo * History of treatment with experimental drug within 28 days of Visit 1 * Currently taking Mecamylamine, Sodium Phosphates, Salicylates, Mefloquine, Methenamine and other Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy of Acetazolamide on Ataxia Measured Via Miniature International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (Mini-ICARS)baseline-6 monthsTo achieve this goal, we compared the change of Mini-ICARS score from baseline to after six months of treatment between the placebo and active treatment groups. Minimal score is 0, maximum score is 100, higher score indicates greater impairment. Each subscale has an ordinal scale with a 0 indicating normal and the higher score indicating greater impairment or that the patient was unable to complete the task.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electrolyte Balance Testingthrough study completion, approximately 2 yearsElectrolyte balance was assessed through combination testing on concentration of potassium, sodium, chloride, bicarbonate, magnesium, calcium, and phosphate. The number of participants who experience a drug related adverse event related to abnormal electrolyte balance.
Urine Calcium Excretion Testingthrough study completion, approximately 2 yearsUrine calcium excretion is measured by mg excreted per day. The number of participants who experience a drug related adverse event related to abnormal excretion of calcium.
Examine Effect of Acetazolamide on PMM2 Biomarker Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin6 monthsNumber of patients with abnormal ratio result will be recorded to understand the effect acetazolamide has on this biomarker
Abnormal Blood pH Valuethrough study completion, approximately 2 yearsBlood pH level was assessed through venous blood gas test. The number of participants who experience a drug related adverse event related to abnormal blood pH value.
Change in Dysarthria as Measured by the PATA Scorebaseline, 6 monthsPATA test measures the number of times a patient can say the word PATA in a 10 second time period. Number of PATAs spoken in 10 seconds indicates level of dysarthria. The higher the score the less dysarthria, the lower the score more dysarthria.
Change in Nijmegen Pediatric CDG Rating Scale (NPCRS)baseline, 6 monthsThe NPCRS is a scale that evaluates the patient's current function, system specific involvement, and current clinical assessment. Total scores range from 0 - 82. A mild score is 0-14, moderate score is 15-25, and severe is a score \>26.
Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scorebaseline, 6 monthsPROMIS = Physical activity 10-items from 1(no days) to 5(6-7 days), Strength impact 12-item from 1(no days) to 5(6-7 days), Fatigue 23-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Mobility 23-item from 1(not able to do) to 5(with no trouble), Pain interference 13-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Upper extremity coordination 29-item from 1(not able to do) to 5(with no trouble), Global Health 9-item from 1(poor) to 5( excellent), Parent Proxy Mobility 8-item from 1(not able to do) to 5(with no trouble), Anxiety 8-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Depresson 8-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Parent Proxy Fatigue 8-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Peer relationships 8-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Parent proxy pain interference 8-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Pain intensity 1-item from 0(no pain) to 10(worst pain). Total scores range from 168 - 845. Lower scores indicate worse health, higher scores indicate better health

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Acetazolamide
Acetazolamide was administered via capsule or liquid suspension. Capsule was 250 mg oral capsules encapsulated by gelatin capsule and filled with lactose to match placebo. Liquid suspension was 25 mg/mL oral suspension but adding 125 mg Acetazolamide tablets to suspending agent Ora-blend Acetazolamide: administered orally or enterally
13
Placebo
Placebo was administered via capsule or liquid suspension. Capsule was a gelatin capsule filled with lactose powder to match Acetazolamide. Liquid suspension was a Ora-blend. Placebo: administered orally or enterally
12
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision35
Overall StudyProtocol Violation20
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject57

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAcetazolamideTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous13.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.47
12.30 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.11
10.88 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.26
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants22 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants21 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants25 participants12 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants18 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 138 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 133 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy of Acetazolamide on Ataxia Measured Via Miniature International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (Mini-ICARS)

To achieve this goal, we compared the change of Mini-ICARS score from baseline to after six months of treatment between the placebo and active treatment groups. Minimal score is 0, maximum score is 100, higher score indicates greater impairment. Each subscale has an ordinal scale with a 0 indicating normal and the higher score indicating greater impairment or that the patient was unable to complete the task.

Time frame: baseline-6 months

Population: Data was not collected nor analyzed for two subjects in the Acetazolamide arm and one subject in the Placebo arm

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcetazolamideEfficacy of Acetazolamide on Ataxia Measured Via Miniature International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (Mini-ICARS)1.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.2
PlaceboEfficacy of Acetazolamide on Ataxia Measured Via Miniature International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (Mini-ICARS)1.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.23
p-value: 0.84t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Abnormal Blood pH Value

Blood pH level was assessed through venous blood gas test. The number of participants who experience a drug related adverse event related to abnormal blood pH value.

Time frame: through study completion, approximately 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AcetazolamideAbnormal Blood pH Value0 Participants
PlaceboAbnormal Blood pH Value1 Participants
p-value: 0.48Fisher Exact
Secondary

Change in Dysarthria as Measured by the PATA Score

PATA test measures the number of times a patient can say the word PATA in a 10 second time period. Number of PATAs spoken in 10 seconds indicates level of dysarthria. The higher the score the less dysarthria, the lower the score more dysarthria.

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

Population: Data was not collected nor analyzed for four participants in the Acetazolamide arm and three participants in the Placebo arm

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcetazolamideChange in Dysarthria as Measured by the PATA Score2.30 words/10 secStandard Deviation 3.71
PlaceboChange in Dysarthria as Measured by the PATA Score0.59 words/10 secStandard Deviation 3.11
p-value: 0.31t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Nijmegen Pediatric CDG Rating Scale (NPCRS)

The NPCRS is a scale that evaluates the patient's current function, system specific involvement, and current clinical assessment. Total scores range from 0 - 82. A mild score is 0-14, moderate score is 15-25, and severe is a score \>26.

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

Population: Data was not collected nor analyzed for three participants in the Acetazolamide arm and one participant in the Placebo arm

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcetazolamideChange in Nijmegen Pediatric CDG Rating Scale (NPCRS)1.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
PlaceboChange in Nijmegen Pediatric CDG Rating Scale (NPCRS)0.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
p-value: 0.09t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Score

PROMIS = Physical activity 10-items from 1(no days) to 5(6-7 days), Strength impact 12-item from 1(no days) to 5(6-7 days), Fatigue 23-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Mobility 23-item from 1(not able to do) to 5(with no trouble), Pain interference 13-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Upper extremity coordination 29-item from 1(not able to do) to 5(with no trouble), Global Health 9-item from 1(poor) to 5( excellent), Parent Proxy Mobility 8-item from 1(not able to do) to 5(with no trouble), Anxiety 8-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Depresson 8-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Parent Proxy Fatigue 8-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Peer relationships 8-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Parent proxy pain interference 8-item from 1(never) to 5(almost always), Pain intensity 1-item from 0(no pain) to 10(worst pain). Total scores range from 168 - 845. Lower scores indicate worse health, higher scores indicate better health

Time frame: baseline, 6 months

Population: Data was not collected nor analyzed for seven subjects in the Acetazolamide arm and four subjects in the Placebo arm

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AcetazolamideChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Score3.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.45
PlaceboChange in Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Score0.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.09
Secondary

Electrolyte Balance Testing

Electrolyte balance was assessed through combination testing on concentration of potassium, sodium, chloride, bicarbonate, magnesium, calcium, and phosphate. The number of participants who experience a drug related adverse event related to abnormal electrolyte balance.

Time frame: through study completion, approximately 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AcetazolamideElectrolyte Balance Testing0 Participants
PlaceboElectrolyte Balance Testing1 Participants
p-value: 0.48Fisher Exact
Secondary

Examine Effect of Acetazolamide on PMM2 Biomarker Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin

Number of patients with abnormal ratio result will be recorded to understand the effect acetazolamide has on this biomarker

Time frame: 6 months

Population: Data was not collected nor analyzed for this outcome measure. Data collection for this outcome never occurred. PMM2 biomarker carbohydrate deficient transferrin was not collected for any subjects. The test was never collected for any subjects.

Secondary

Urine Calcium Excretion Testing

Urine calcium excretion is measured by mg excreted per day. The number of participants who experience a drug related adverse event related to abnormal excretion of calcium.

Time frame: through study completion, approximately 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
AcetazolamideUrine Calcium Excretion Testing0 Participants
PlaceboUrine Calcium Excretion Testing0 Participants
p-value: >0.99Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026