Skip to content

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI7352 in Participants With Painful Osteoarthritis of the Knee

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-response Study of the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI7352 in Subjects With Painful Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04675034
Acronym
BESPOKE
Enrollment
345
Registered
2020-12-19
Start date
2020-12-02
Completion date
2023-08-16
Last updated
2025-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Painful Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Keywords

Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

This is a Phase IIb randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study in participants with painful osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The study will assess the safety and efficacy of multiple doses of MEDI7352 compared to placebo, as well as the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and immunogenicity of MEDI7352 in participants with moderate to severe chronic pain persistent for 3 months or more not adequately controlled by standard of care treatments.

Interventions

Participants will receive SC injection of MEDI7352 as stated in arm description.

OTHERPlacebo

Participants will receive SC injection of placebo as stated in arm description.

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

All participants will be centrally assigned to randomised IP using an Interactive Response Technology/Randomisation and Trial Supply Management (IRT/RTSM) system. Before the study is initiated, telephone number and call-in directions for IRT and/or log in information and directions for RTSM will be provided to each site. The IRT/RTSM will provide investigator(s) or appropriate study personnel with kit identification number to be allocated to participant at IP dosing visit. Details for this will be described in IRT/RTSM user manual that will be provided to each centre. All participants, investigators, and study personnel involved in conduct of the study will be blinded to treatment assignment. The unblinded study personnel (eg, site pharmacist) will not participate in study procedures or data analysis prior to unblinding of study data to all study-related personnel. Unblinded AstraZeneca personnel who are not otherwise involved in study will prepare data for review and interim analyses.

Intervention model description

This is a Phase IIb, multinational, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of MEDI7352 in participants 18 to 80 years of age (inclusive) with moderate-to-severe chronic pain of the knee. The study consists of a screening period of up to 45 days, a 12-week treatment period, and a 24-week follow-up (FU) period. Daily pain scores (as measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale \[NRS\]) recorded at the first screening visit and from Day -7 to Day -1 will be used be used to determine eligibility. Participants will be randomised to one of 4 doses of MEDI7352 or placebo. Each participant will receive 6 doses of MEDI7352 or placebo during the treatment period. After the end-of-treatment (EOT) visit at Week 12, participants will enter the FU period, which comprises 3 clinic visits (Weeks 18, 32, and 36) and 4 FU phone calls (Weeks 15, 21, 24, and 28). All participants who receive investigational product (IP) are expected to complete the FU period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants must understand the nature of the study and must give signed and dated written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study procedures, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol. 2. For participants participating in the optional genetic research, a separate signed and dated optional genetic research ICF must be provided prior to collection of samples for optional genetic research that supports the Genomics Initiative. If a participant declines to participate in the genetic research, this will have no influence on the ability of a participant to participate in the study. 3. The participant should be willing and able to understand and comply with all protocol-specified restrictions and procedures and be able to use an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) device as judged by the investigator. 4. The participant must be considered likely to comply with the study protocol and to have a high probability of completing the study, as judged by the investigator. 5. The participant must be willing and able to discontinue all analgesic therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors from the start of the washout period until the end of the FU period. This includes over-the-counter (OTC) pain medications and topical analgesics that contain an NSAID or COX-2 inhibitor.

Exclusion criteria

1. Requires current treatment with another biologic therapeutic agent, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), or other immunosuppressants. 2. Previously received any form of anti-nerve growth factor (NGF); received anti-tumour necrosis factors (TNFs) including but not limited to golimumab, certolizumab, infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, or rituximab within 12 months prior to screening, or other biological DMARDs (including but not limited to abatacept, tocilizumab, and tofacitinib), or other immunosuppressants within 6 months prior to screening (with the exception of inhaled or topical corticosteroids). 3. Currently receiving strong opioids for any indication. 4. Participation in another clinical study with an IP or device within 60 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening. 5. Plasma donation within 28 days of screening or any blood donation or blood loss \> 500 mL within 2 months of screening. 6. Previous allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplant. 7. Received nonleukocyte-depleted whole blood transfusion within 120 days of the genetic research sample collection, if participating in the optional genetic research. 8. Involvement in the planning and/or conduct of the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score to Week 12Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive) through Week 12Change from baseline in weekly average of daily NRS pain score to Week 12 is reported. The NRS is an 11-point Likert scale used to assess pain, where participants were asked to describe their average pain in the target knee by identifying a number from 0 = no pain to 10 = most severe pain imaginable over the previous 24 hours. This was recorded on a daily basis at approximately the same time every morning via electronic patient recorded outcome (ePRO) diary. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing post-baseline scores.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale to Week 12Week 0 (Day 1; baseline) through Week 12The WOMAC multiscale index is used to assess pain, stiffness, and joint functionality in the past 48 hours in participants with OA of the knee or hip. The WOMAC physical function (PF) subscale consists of 17 questions assessing the participant's difficulty in performing activities of daily living due to OA in the target knee. Each question is scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC PF subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 17 questions, where higher scores represent worse function. Change from baseline in WOMAC physical function to Week 12 is reported. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing post-baseline scores.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of OA to Week 12Week 0 (Day 1; baseline) through Week 12The PGA of OA was a 5-point Likert scale used to assess symptoms and activity impairment due to OA of the knee. Participants were asked to identify a number from 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation to normal activities) to 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities) based on the question Considering all the ways that OA of the knee affects you, how are you feeling today?. Change from baseline in PGA of OA to Week 12 is reported. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing post-baseline scores.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeBaseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), and 18 (Day 126)The WOMAC multiscale index is used to assess pain, stiffness, and joint functionality in the past 48 hours in participants with OA of the knee or hip. The WOMAC pain subscale consists of 5 questions assessing the participant's pain due to OA in the target knee. Each question was scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC pain subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 5 questions, where higher scores represent higher pain. Change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale to Weeks 2, 4,6, 8, 10, and 18 is reported.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeBaseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), and 18 (Day 126)The WOMAC multiscale index is used to assess pain, stiffness, and joint functionality in the past 48 hours in participants with OA of the knee or hip. The WOMAC PF subscale consists of 17 questions assessing the participant's difficulty in performing activities of daily living due to OA in the target knee. Each question is scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC PF subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 17 questions, where higher scores represent worse function. Change from baseline in WOMAC physical function to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 18 is reported.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeBaseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)The WOMAC overall score consisted of all 24 questions reported in the WOMAC questionnaire to assess: i) pain subscale, ii) PF subscale and iii) stiffness subscale. WOMAC overall score was calculated as the mean score from all 24 questions each scored on a Likert scale from 0 to 10 where higher scores represent worse outcome. Change from baseline in weekly average of WOMAC overall score to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 18 is reported.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeBaseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)The WOMAC stiffness function subscale consists of 2 questions assessing stiffness due to OA in the target knee. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the target knee. Each question is scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC stiffness function subscale score is calculated as the mean score from the 2 questions, where higher scores represent higher stiffness. Change from baseline in WOMAC stiffness score to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 18 is reported.
Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeBaseline, Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), and 18 (Day 126)The PGA of OA was a 5-point Likert scale used to assess symptoms and activity impairment due to OA of the knee. Participants were asked to identify a number from 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation to normal activities) to 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities) based on the question Considering all the ways that OA of the knee affects you, how are you feeling today?. Change from baseline in PGA of OA to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 10, and 18 is reported.
Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)The OMERACT-OARSI responder index is calculated from the WOMAC Pain subscale, the WOMAC Physical Function Subscale and the PGA of OA. A participant is classified as a responder if: 1. \>= 2-point absolute change from Baseline to Week X or a \>= 50% improvement is reported in the WOMAC Pain or the PF subscales; 2. At least 2 of the following 3 conditions are true: \>= 1-point absolute change from Baseline to Week X or \>= 20% improvement is reported in the WOMAC Pain subscale, \>= 1-point absolute change from Baseline to Week X or \>= 20% improvement is reported in the WOMAC PF subscale or \>= 1-point absolute change from Baseline to Week X is reported in the PGA of OA. Percentage of responder participants are reported.
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)The PGA of OA was a 5-point Likert scale used to assess symptoms and activity impairment due to OA of the knee. Participants were asked to identify a number from 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation to normal activities) to 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities) based on the question Considering all the ways that OA of the knee affects you, how are you feeling today?. Percentage of participants with improvement of \>= 2 points in PGA of OA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 18 is reported.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), and 18 (Day 126)The NRS is an 11-point Likert scale used to assess pain, where participants were asked to describe their average pain in the target knee by identifying a number from 0 = no pain to 10 = most severe pain imaginable over the previous 24 hours. This will be recorded on a daily basis at approximately the same time every morning via ePRO diary. Change from baseline in weekly average of daily NRS to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 18 is reported.
Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeBaseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)The NRS is an 11-point Likert scale used to assess pain, where participants were asked to describe their average pain in the target knee by identifying a number from 0 = no pain to 10 = most severe pain imaginable over the previous 24 hours. This will be recorded on a daily basis at approximately the same time every morning via ePRO diary. Percentage of participants with \>= 30% and \>= 50% reductions in weekly average of daily NRS pain score are reported.
Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over TimeBaseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)The WOMAC multiscale index is used to assess pain, stiffness, and joint functionality in the past 48 hours in participants with OA of the knee or hip. The WOMAC pain subscale consists of 5 questions assessing the participant's pain due to OA in the target knee. Each question was scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC pain subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 5 questions, where higher scores represent higher pain. Percentage of participants with \>= 30% and \>= 50% reductions in WOMAC pain subscale score over time are reported.
Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over TimeBaseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)The WOMAC PF subscale consists of 17 questions assessing the participant's difficulty in performing activities of daily living due to OA in the target knee. Each question is scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC PF subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 17 questions, where higher scores represent worse function. Percentage of participants with \>= 30% and \>= 50% reductions in WOMAC physical function subscale over time are reported.
Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Baseline (Day 1), Day 7; pre-dose on Days 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70; and on Days 74, 77, 84, 126, and 224Serum concentration of MEDI7352 is reported.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale to Week 12Week 0 (Day 1; baseline) through Week 12The WOMAC multiscale index is used to assess pain, stiffness, and joint functionality in the past 48 hours in participants with OA of the knee or hip. The WOMAC pain subscale consists of 5 questions assessing the participant's pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) in the target knee. Each question was scored on a NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC pain subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 5 questions, where higher scores represent higher pain. Change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale to Week 12 is reported. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing post-baseline scores.
ADA Titre in Participants Who Were ADA Positive at Baseline and/or Post-baselineBaseline (Day 1), Day 7; pre-dose on Days 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70; and on Days 74, 77, 84, 126, and 224The ADA titre in participants who were ADA positive at baseline and/or post-baseline is reported.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Day 1 through 41 weeks (maximum observed duration)An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEsDay 1 through 41 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with clinically significant findings in physical examination reported as TEAE are reported. A physical examination included assessments of general appearance, skin, head and neck, examination of the oral cavity for any lesions, lymph nodes, thyroid, abdomen (bowel sounds, liver, and spleen palpation), back (including costovertebral angle tenderness), musculoskeletal/extremities, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationBaseline (Day -45 to Day -1), Weeks 0 (Day 1), 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), 12 (Day 84), 18 (Day 126), 28 (Day 168), 32 (Day 224), and 36 (Day 252)Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal findings in neurological examination is reported. The neurological examination included assessment of mental status, cranial nerves, motor examination (muscle strength and tone), upper and lower extremity deep tendon reflexes, plantar responses, sensory system examination, coordination, and gait.
Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeBaseline (Day -45 to Day -1), Weeks 0 (Day 1), 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), 12 (Day 84), 28 (Day 196), and 32 (Day 224)The TNSn, is a semiquantitative clinical assessment of peripheral nervous system function. The TNSn assessment is collected as scores of motor symptom, autonomic symptom, pin sensibility, sensory symptom, and vibration sensibility score. Each neuropathy item is scored on a 0 to 4 scale with total score ranging from 0 to 20. Higher total scores correlate with more severe neuropathy.
Change From Baseline in Weight (kg) to Week 12Baseline (Day -45 to -1) and Week 12Change from baseline in weight (kg) to Week 12 is reported.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsDay 1 through 41 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with abnormal vital signs reported as TEAEs are reported. Abnormal vital signs are defined as any abnormalfinding in the vital sign parameters (body temperature, supine and standing blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiratory rate).
Change From Baseline in Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) Total Impact ScoreBaseline (Day 1; Week 0) and Day 252 (Week 36)The SAS is an instrument that measures autonomic symptoms used for assessing autonomic neuropathies in clinical trials. The SAS scale evaluates the presence of symptoms and the degree of severity. The SAS consists of 11 questions in women and 12 questions in men. Each question has a Yes or No answer to symptoms occurring 6 months prior to investigational product (IP) administration. Questions answered with Yes are further rated by asking the participant how much each symptom is bothering him or her. Each answer is scored on a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = not at all and 5 = a lot, and a total symptom impact score is determined. The SAS total impact score is the total of the scores from each question (11 for women and 12 for men). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 55 for women and 60 for men. A higher score indicates worse autonomic dysfunction.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Weeks 0 (Day 1), 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), 12 (Day 84), 28 (Day 168), and 32 (Day 224)Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECGs are reported.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsDay 1 through 41 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported.
Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Level to Week 12Baseline (Day -7 to -1, inclusive) and Week 12Change from baseline in C-reactive protein level to Week 12 is reported.
Number of Participants With Injection Site ReactionsDay 1 through 41 weeks (maximum observed duration)Number of participants with injection site reactions are reported.
Number of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsBaseline (Day -45 to -1) and Week 32Number of participants with abnormal X-ray and/or MRI of large joints is reported.
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Baseline (Day 1), Day 7; pre-dose on Days 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70; and on Days 74, 77, 84, 126, and 224Number of participants with ADA to MEDI7352 are reported. Treatment-induced ADA positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and positive at least 1 post-baseline ADA assessment. Treatment-boosted ADA positive is defined as ADA positive at baseline, and the baseline titre is boosted by greater than the variability of the assay (commonly 4-fold) at \>= 1 post-baseline timepoint. Persistent positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and having at least 2 post-baseline ADA positive assessments (with \>= 16 weeks between first and last positive) or ADA positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and at least one post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive.

Countries

Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Poland, Spain, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 50 sites in 6 countries (the United Kingdom, Denmark, Estonia, Germany, Poland, and Spain).

Pre-assignment details

A total of 345 participants were randomized, of which 344 participants received at least one dose of study drug.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1
Participants received 6 doses of subcutaneous (SC) MEDl7352 Dose Level 1 injection once every 2 weeks (Q2W) during a 12-week parallel-group treatment period.
70
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2
Participants received 6 doses of SC MEDl7352 Dose Level 2 injection Q2W during a 12-week parallel-group treatment period.
68
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3
Participants received 6 doses of SC MEDl7352 Dose Level 3 injection Q2W during a 12-week parallel-group treatment period.
69
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4
Participants received 6 doses of SC MEDl7352 Dose Level 4 injection Q2W during a 12-week parallel-group treatment period.
68
Placebo
Participants received 6 doses of SC placebo injection matched to MEDl7352 Q2W during a 12-week parallel-group treatment period.
70
Total345

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11020
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10013
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject93486

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMEDl7352 Dose Level 1MEDl7352 Dose Level 2MEDl7352 Dose Level 3MEDl7352 Dose Level 4PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous65.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9
63.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.73
63.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.91
63.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.52
62.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.03
63.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.67
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
69 Participants67 Participants67 Participants67 Participants70 Participants340 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
69 Participants66 Participants67 Participants65 Participants67 Participants334 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants51 Participants48 Participants46 Participants42 Participants230 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants17 Participants21 Participants22 Participants28 Participants115 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 700 / 680 / 690 / 680 / 69
other
Total, other adverse events
51 / 7045 / 6854 / 6951 / 6840 / 69
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 705 / 683 / 691 / 682 / 69

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score to Week 12

Change from baseline in weekly average of daily NRS pain score to Week 12 is reported. The NRS is an 11-point Likert scale used to assess pain, where participants were asked to describe their average pain in the target knee by identifying a number from 0 = no pain to 10 = most severe pain imaginable over the previous 24 hours. This was recorded on a daily basis at approximately the same time every morning via electronic patient recorded outcome (ePRO) diary. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing post-baseline scores.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive) through Week 12

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score to Week 12-2.19 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.243
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score to Week 12-3.00 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.342
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score to Week 12-2.83 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.522
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score to Week 12-2.81 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.835
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Score to Week 12-2.35 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.364
p-value: 0.3695% CI: [-0.968, 0.67]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.02995% CI: [-1.619, 0.027]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.02695% CI: [-1.618, 0.009]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.08395% CI: [-1.423, 0.245]ANCOVA
Secondary

ADA Titre in Participants Who Were ADA Positive at Baseline and/or Post-baseline

The ADA titre in participants who were ADA positive at baseline and/or post-baseline is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7; pre-dose on Days 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70; and on Days 74, 77, 84, 126, and 224

Population: ADA evaluable participants included all participants in safety analysis set who have non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-baseline ADA results. Number of participants analyzed (N): number of participants who were ADA positive at baseline and/or post-baseline. Number analyzed (n): participants who had adequate ADA sample.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1ADA Titre in Participants Who Were ADA Positive at Baseline and/or Post-baseline960.0 Ratio
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2ADA Titre in Participants Who Were ADA Positive at Baseline and/or Post-baseline960.0 Ratio
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3ADA Titre in Participants Who Were ADA Positive at Baseline and/or Post-baseline960.0 Ratio
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4ADA Titre in Participants Who Were ADA Positive at Baseline and/or Post-baseline720.0 Ratio
PlaceboADA Titre in Participants Who Were ADA Positive at Baseline and/or Post-baseline240.0 Ratio
Secondary

Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Level to Week 12

Change from baseline in C-reactive protein level to Week 12 is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to -1, inclusive) and Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Level to Week 12-2.55 mg/LStandard Deviation 1.975
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Level to Week 12-3.34 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.004
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Level to Week 12-3.30 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.422
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Level to Week 12-3.68 mg/LStandard Deviation 2.313
PlaceboChange From Baseline in C-reactive Protein Level to Week 12-2.38 mg/LStandard Deviation 1.971
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of OA to Week 12

The PGA of OA was a 5-point Likert scale used to assess symptoms and activity impairment due to OA of the knee. Participants were asked to identify a number from 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation to normal activities) to 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities) based on the question Considering all the ways that OA of the knee affects you, how are you feeling today?. Change from baseline in PGA of OA to Week 12 is reported. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing post-baseline scores.

Time frame: Week 0 (Day 1; baseline) through Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of OA to Week 12-0.34 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.933
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of OA to Week 12-0.72 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.123
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of OA to Week 12-0.81 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.032
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of OA to Week 12-0.69 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.377
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of OA to Week 12-0.57 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.003
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over Time

The PGA of OA was a 5-point Likert scale used to assess symptoms and activity impairment due to OA of the knee. Participants were asked to identify a number from 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation to normal activities) to 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities) based on the question Considering all the ways that OA of the knee affects you, how are you feeling today?. Change from baseline in PGA of OA to Weeks 2, 4, 8, 10, and 18 is reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants who were evaluable for the specified outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 10-0.42 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.723
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 2-0.35 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.812
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 18-0.39 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.655
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 4-0.48 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.738
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 8-0.57 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 10-0.76 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.922
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 8-0.80 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.026
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 4-0.68 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.066
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 18-0.66 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.022
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 2-0.56 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.917
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 8-1.02 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.09
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 2-0.67 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.933
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 4-0.86 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.043
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 10-1.02 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.01
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 18-0.83 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.117
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 18-1.10 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.294
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 2-0.42 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.059
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 10-1.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.295
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 8-1.04 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.098
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 4-0.86 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.106
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 8-0.51 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.843
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 10-0.67 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.826
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 2-0.37 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.698
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 18-0.56 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PGA of OA Over TimeWeek 4-0.48 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.792
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) Total Impact Score

The SAS is an instrument that measures autonomic symptoms used for assessing autonomic neuropathies in clinical trials. The SAS scale evaluates the presence of symptoms and the degree of severity. The SAS consists of 11 questions in women and 12 questions in men. Each question has a Yes or No answer to symptoms occurring 6 months prior to investigational product (IP) administration. Questions answered with Yes are further rated by asking the participant how much each symptom is bothering him or her. Each answer is scored on a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 = not at all and 5 = a lot, and a total symptom impact score is determined. The SAS total impact score is the total of the scores from each question (11 for women and 12 for men). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum is 55 for women and 60 for men. A higher score indicates worse autonomic dysfunction.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1; Week 0) and Day 252 (Week 36)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants who were evaluable for the specified outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who had adequate SAS impact score.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) Total Impact Score-1.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.78
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) Total Impact Score-1.1 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.63
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) Total Impact Score-0.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.13
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) Total Impact Score-1.6 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Survey of Autonomic Symptoms (SAS) Total Impact Score-0.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.5
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time

The NRS is an 11-point Likert scale used to assess pain, where participants were asked to describe their average pain in the target knee by identifying a number from 0 = no pain to 10 = most severe pain imaginable over the previous 24 hours. This will be recorded on a daily basis at approximately the same time every morning via ePRO diary. Change from baseline in weekly average of daily NRS to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 18 is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.62 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.704
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 4-1.88 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.653
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 6-2.17 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.687
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 8-2.27 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.736
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 10-2.38 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.001
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 18-2.08 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 10-3.18 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.93
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 18-3.18 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.237
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.86 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.949
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 6-2.83 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.248
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 8-2.91 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.084
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 4-2.50 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.163
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 8-3.09 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.205
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 10-3.24 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.294
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.97 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.012
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 6-3.00 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.192
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 4-2.68 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.177
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 18-2.90 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.157
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 8-3.45 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.365
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 4-2.65 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.333
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 6-3.35 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.498
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 18-3.63 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.383
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 10-3.57 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.274
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 2-2.26 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.129
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 10-2.28 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.047
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 6-1.97 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 4-1.66 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.854
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 18-2.45 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.969
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 8-2.18 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.274
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.10 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.811
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weight (kg) to Week 12

Change from baseline in weight (kg) to Week 12 is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -45 to -1) and Week 12

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated at Week 12

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Weight (kg) to Week 12-0.25 kgStandard Deviation 2.048
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Weight (kg) to Week 120.10 kgStandard Deviation 2.343
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Weight (kg) to Week 120.34 kgStandard Deviation 1.932
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Weight (kg) to Week 12-0.03 kgStandard Deviation 1.864
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weight (kg) to Week 12-0.34 kgStandard Deviation 2.004
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale to Week 12

The WOMAC multiscale index is used to assess pain, stiffness, and joint functionality in the past 48 hours in participants with OA of the knee or hip. The WOMAC pain subscale consists of 5 questions assessing the participant's pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) in the target knee. Each question was scored on a NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC pain subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 5 questions, where higher scores represent higher pain. Change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale to Week 12 is reported. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing post-baseline scores.

Time frame: Week 0 (Day 1; baseline) through Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale to Week 12-1.88 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.047
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale to Week 12-2.88 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.407
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale to Week 12-2.62 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.305
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale to Week 12-2.57 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.992
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale to Week 12-2.62 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.558
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over Time

The WOMAC overall score consisted of all 24 questions reported in the WOMAC questionnaire to assess: i) pain subscale, ii) PF subscale and iii) stiffness subscale. WOMAC overall score was calculated as the mean score from all 24 questions each scored on a Likert scale from 0 to 10 where higher scores represent worse outcome. Change from baseline in weekly average of WOMAC overall score to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 18 is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.11 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.546
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 18-1.68 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.148
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 12-1.82 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.945
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 6-1.85 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.583
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 4-1.66 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.706
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 8-1.75 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.792
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 10-1.86 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.907
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 10-2.94 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.995
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 8-2.85 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.995
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 4-2.14 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.958
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.71 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.836
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 12-3.00 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.087
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 6-2.54 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.968
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 18-2.78 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.153
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 8-2.69 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.757
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.58 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.343
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 4-2.25 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.667
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 6-2.52 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.426
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 10-2.72 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.663
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 12-2.76 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.616
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 18-2.46 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.718
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 6-2.79 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.951
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 10-3.35 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.954
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 4-2.45 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 18-3.24 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.784
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 12-3.48 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.121
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.88 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.735
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 8-3.12 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.822
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 6-1.98 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.984
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 18-2.42 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.767
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 12-2.56 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.956
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 10-2.43 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.022
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 4-1.74 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.671
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 2-1.04 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.695
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Overall Score Over TimeWeek 8-2.19 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.102
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over Time

The WOMAC multiscale index is used to assess pain, stiffness, and joint functionality in the past 48 hours in participants with OA of the knee or hip. The WOMAC pain subscale consists of 5 questions assessing the participant's pain due to OA in the target knee. Each question was scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC pain subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 5 questions, where higher scores represent higher pain. Change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale to Weeks 2, 4,6, 8, 10, and 18 is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 10-2.14 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.886
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 18-2.00 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.09
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 4-1.62 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.635
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 8-2.01 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 6-2.01 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.541
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 2-1.32 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.501
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 4-2.33 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 10-3.22 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.282
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 18-3.02 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.388
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 2-1.79 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.988
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 6-2.76 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.223
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 8-2.96 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.259
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 18-2.61 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.107
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 4-2.41 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.939
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 8-2.91 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.954
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 6-2.73 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.852
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 10-2.89 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.052
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 2-1.58 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.571
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 18-3.50 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.988
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 6-3.07 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.065
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 4-2.60 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.077
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 8-3.33 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.964
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 10-3.54 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.055
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 2-1.88 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.953
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 10-2.89 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.283
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 6-2.40 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.114
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 18-2.97 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.219
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 2-1.30 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.968
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 4-2.08 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Over TimeWeek 8-2.56 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.431
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over Time

The WOMAC multiscale index is used to assess pain, stiffness, and joint functionality in the past 48 hours in participants with OA of the knee or hip. The WOMAC PF subscale consists of 17 questions assessing the participant's difficulty in performing activities of daily living due to OA in the target knee. Each question is scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC PF subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 17 questions, where higher scores represent worse function. Change from baseline in WOMAC physical function to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 18 is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 2-1.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.621
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 4-1.59 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.812
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 8-1.64 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.856
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 6-1.77 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.67
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 10-1.74 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.994
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 18-1.55 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.267
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 10-2.85 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.944
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 6-2.43 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.946
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 2-1.64 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.877
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 18-2.71 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.141
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 8-2.82 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.96
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 4-2.07 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.933
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 8-2.68 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.792
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 10-2.65 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.671
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 2-1.56 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.417
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 6-2.43 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.436
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 4-2.20 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.701
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 18-2.37 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.722
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 8-3.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.858
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 4-2.39 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.062
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 6-2.71 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.001
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 18-3.17 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.812
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 10-3.30 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.979
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 2-1.80 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.778
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 10-2.26 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.063
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 6-1.92 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.945
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 4-1.62 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.708
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 18-2.24 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.81
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 8-2.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.114
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC PF Subscale Over TimeWeek 2-0.96 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.728
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale to Week 12

The WOMAC multiscale index is used to assess pain, stiffness, and joint functionality in the past 48 hours in participants with OA of the knee or hip. The WOMAC physical function (PF) subscale consists of 17 questions assessing the participant's difficulty in performing activities of daily living due to OA in the target knee. Each question is scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC PF subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 17 questions, where higher scores represent worse function. Change from baseline in WOMAC physical function to Week 12 is reported. A two-step multiple imputation procedure was used to address missing post-baseline scores.

Time frame: Week 0 (Day 1; baseline) through Week 12

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale to Week 12-1.48 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.233
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale to Week 12-2.56 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.352
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale to Week 12-2.45 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.909
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale to Week 12-2.22 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.887
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale to Week 12-2.14 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.338
Secondary

Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over Time

The WOMAC stiffness function subscale consists of 2 questions assessing stiffness due to OA in the target knee. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the target knee. Each question is scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC stiffness function subscale score is calculated as the mean score from the 2 questions, where higher scores represent higher stiffness. Change from baseline in WOMAC stiffness score to Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 18 is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 2-1.30 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.887
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 18-2.04 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.192
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 12-2.29 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.034
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 6-2.13 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.837
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 4-1.88 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.938
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 8-1.99 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.125
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 10-2.13 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 10-2.99 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.277
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 8-2.85 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 4-2.26 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.146
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 2-2.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.015
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 12-3.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 6-2.79 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.307
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 18-2.76 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.401
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 8-2.85 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.103
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 2-1.85 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.927
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 4-2.33 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.127
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 6-2.72 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.871
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 10-2.96 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.977
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 12-3.06 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.04
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 18-2.86 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.988
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 6-2.97 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.428
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 10-3.29 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.091
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 4-2.55 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.368
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 18-3.17 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.797
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 12-3.43 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.407
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 2-2.13 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Change From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 8-3.07 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.104
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 6-2.27 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.314
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 18-2.62 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.152
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 12-2.85 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.372
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 10-2.67 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.329
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 4-1.91 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.009
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 2-0.99 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.805
PlaceboChange From Baseline in WOMAC Stiffness Scores Over TimeWeek 8-2.39 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.633
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEs

Number of participants with abnormal clinical laboratory parameters reported as TEAEs are reported.

Time frame: Day 1 through 41 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsType 2 diabetes mellitus0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsActivated partial thromboplastin time prolonged0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCOVID-1916 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlycosuria0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypertriglyceridaemia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlycosylated haemoglobin increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutropenia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukopenia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukocyturia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood uric acid increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood folate decreased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsProteinuria0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercholesterolaemia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsVitamin D deficiency0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood creatine phosphokinase increased2 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphopenia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAnaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperkalaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypokalaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyponatraemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGamma-glutamyltransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCoagulation factor increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsActivated partial thromboplastin time prolonged0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsProteinuria0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood creatine phosphokinase increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphopenia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCoagulation factor increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypokalaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGamma-glutamyltransferase increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlycosuria1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukocyturia2 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutropenia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukopenia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlycosylated haemoglobin increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCOVID-195 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood uric acid increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAnaemia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperkalaemia2 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercholesterolaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypertriglyceridaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyponatraemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsType 2 diabetes mellitus0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood folate decreased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsVitamin D deficiency1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood folate decreased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood creatine phosphokinase increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAnaemia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypertriglyceridaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsActivated partial thromboplastin time prolonged1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphopenia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsProteinuria2 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperkalaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyponatraemia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCoagulation factor increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsVitamin D deficiency0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukocyturia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutropenia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsType 2 diabetes mellitus0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlycosuria0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypokalaemia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlycosylated haemoglobin increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGamma-glutamyltransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood uric acid increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercholesterolaemia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCOVID-1910 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukopenia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood uric acid increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukopenia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphopenia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutropenia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercholesterolaemia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypertriglyceridaemia2 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyponatraemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsVitamin D deficiency0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlycosuria0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood folate decreased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlycosylated haemoglobin increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCOVID-1912 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAnaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperkalaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypokalaemia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsType 2 diabetes mellitus0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukocyturia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsProteinuria0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsActivated partial thromboplastin time prolonged0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood creatine phosphokinase increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCoagulation factor increased0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGamma-glutamyltransferase increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLymphopenia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood creatine phosphokinase increased2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukocyturia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsType 2 diabetes mellitus1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypokalaemia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyperkalaemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAnaemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCOVID-198 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlycosylated haemoglobin increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood glucose increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood uric acid increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsBlood folate decreased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGlycosuria2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsVitamin D deficiency0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsLeukopenia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsC-reactive protein increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHyponatraemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypertriglyceridaemia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsHypercholesterolaemia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsGamma-glutamyltransferase increased1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsCoagulation factor increased0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsNeutropenia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAspartate aminotransferase increased1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsAlanine aminotransferase increased1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsActivated partial thromboplastin time prolonged0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as TEAEsProteinuria2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs

Number of participants with abnormal vital signs reported as TEAEs are reported. Abnormal vital signs are defined as any abnormalfinding in the vital sign parameters (body temperature, supine and standing blood pressure, pulse rate, and respiratory rate).

Time frame: Day 1 through 41 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertensive crisis1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia paroxysmal1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBradycardia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBradycardia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia paroxysmal0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension2 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertensive crisis0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia paroxysmal0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension3 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertensive crisis0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBradycardia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBradycardia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertensive crisis0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia paroxysmal0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsPyrexia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsBradycardia1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsTachycardia paroxysmal0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertension0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsHypertensive crisis0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs Reported as TEAEsOrthostatic hypotension1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large Joints

Number of participants with abnormal X-ray and/or MRI of large joints is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -45 to -1) and Week 32

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsMRI0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsX-ray1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsMRI1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsX-ray0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsMRI0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsX-ray0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsX-ray1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsMRI0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsMRI0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal X-ray and/or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Large JointsX-ray2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)

Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal ECGs are reported.

Time frame: Weeks 0 (Day 1), 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), 12 (Day 84), 28 (Day 168), and 32 (Day 224)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants who were evaluable for the specified outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 20 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 100 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 320 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 80 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 00 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 280 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 40 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 120 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 00 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 120 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 320 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 20 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 40 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 80 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 100 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 280 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 100 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 80 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 00 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 280 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 20 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 321 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 120 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 40 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 40 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 00 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 20 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 80 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 101 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 120 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 280 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 320 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 80 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 321 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 280 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 00 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 40 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiograms (ECGs)Week 100 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological Examination

Number of participants with clinically significant abnormal findings in neurological examination is reported. The neurological examination included assessment of mental status, cranial nerves, motor examination (muscle strength and tone), upper and lower extremity deep tendon reflexes, plantar responses, sensory system examination, coordination, and gait.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -45 to Day -1), Weeks 0 (Day 1), 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), 12 (Day 84), 18 (Day 126), 28 (Day 168), 32 (Day 224), and 36 (Day 252)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 360 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 120 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 80 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 100 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 00 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 320 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 21 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 280 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 40 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationBaseline0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 180 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 60 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 40 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 20 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 100 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 360 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 80 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 320 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 120 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 180 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 00 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationBaseline0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 60 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 280 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 20 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationBaseline0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 00 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 280 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 40 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 60 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 80 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 100 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 120 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 180 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 320 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 360 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 40 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 281 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 00 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 121 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 362 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 321 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 181 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 60 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 80 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 20 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationBaseline0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 100 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 00 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 41 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 120 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 360 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 180 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 100 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 280 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationBaseline0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 320 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 80 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Findings in Neurological ExaminationWeek 60 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs

Number of participants with clinically significant findings in physical examination reported as TEAE are reported. A physical examination included assessments of general appearance, skin, head and neck, examination of the oral cavity for any lesions, lymph nodes, thyroid, abdomen (bowel sounds, liver, and spleen palpation), back (including costovertebral angle tenderness), musculoskeletal/extremities, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems.

Time frame: Day 1 through 41 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examination Reported as TEAEs0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions

Number of participants with injection site reactions are reported.

Time frame: Day 1 through 41 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions2 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions3 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions0 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Injection Site Reactions4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Injection Site Reactions0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352

Number of participants with ADA to MEDI7352 are reported. Treatment-induced ADA positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and positive at least 1 post-baseline ADA assessment. Treatment-boosted ADA positive is defined as ADA positive at baseline, and the baseline titre is boosted by greater than the variability of the assay (commonly 4-fold) at \>= 1 post-baseline timepoint. Persistent positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and having at least 2 post-baseline ADA positive assessments (with \>= 16 weeks between first and last positive) or ADA positive at last post-baseline assessment. Transiently positive is defined as ADA negative at baseline and at least one post-baseline ADA positive measurement and not fulfilling the conditions for persistently positive.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7; pre-dose on Days 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70; and on Days 74, 77, 84, 126, and 224

Population: ADA evaluable participants included all participants in the safety analysis set who have a non-missing baseline and at least one non-missing post-baseline ADA results. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants who were evaluable for the specified outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who had adequate ADA sample.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-boosted ADA positive6 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-induced ADA positive52 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Persistent positive ADA43 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Transiently positive ADA9 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-boosted ADA positive9 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-induced ADA positive49 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Transiently positive ADA10 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Persistent positive ADA39 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-induced ADA positive42 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-boosted ADA positive8 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Transiently positive ADA9 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Persistent positive ADA33 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-induced ADA positive52 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Persistent positive ADA42 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-boosted ADA positive2 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Transiently positive ADA10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Transiently positive ADA2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Persistent positive ADA4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-induced ADA positive6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) to MEDI7352Treatment-boosted ADA positive2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The TEAEs are defined as events present at baseline that worsened in intensity after administration of study drug or events absent at baseline that emerged after administration of study drug.

Time frame: Day 1 through 41 weeks (maximum observed duration)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs51 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs3 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs45 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs5 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs54 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs3 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs1 Participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs51 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TEAEs41 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)Any TESAEs2 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time

The NRS is an 11-point Likert scale used to assess pain, where participants were asked to describe their average pain in the target knee by identifying a number from 0 = no pain to 10 = most severe pain imaginable over the previous 24 hours. This will be recorded on a daily basis at approximately the same time every morning via ePRO diary. Percentage of participants with \>= 30% and \>= 50% reductions in weekly average of daily NRS pain score are reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7 to Day -1, inclusive), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 856.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1826.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1258.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1244.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 832.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 447.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 234.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 424.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 215.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1842.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 450.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 234.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 867.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1276.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1872.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 225.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 432.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 845.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1254.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1854.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 229.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1249.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 867.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1265.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 464.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1867.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 440.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 241.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1850.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 854.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 453.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1852.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 243.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 861.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 230.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 857.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1254.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 436.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1272.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1865.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1247.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1226.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1854.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 213.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1829.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 415.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 221.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=50%: Week 826.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 842.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in Weekly Average of Daily NRS Pain Score Over Time>=30%: Week 429.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time

The WOMAC multiscale index is used to assess pain, stiffness, and joint functionality in the past 48 hours in participants with OA of the knee or hip. The WOMAC pain subscale consists of 5 questions assessing the participant's pain due to OA in the target knee. Each question was scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC pain subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 5 questions, where higher scores represent higher pain. Percentage of participants with \>= 30% and \>= 50% reductions in WOMAC pain subscale score over time are reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 855.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1833.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1259.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1231.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 835.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 440.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 230.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 424.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 214.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1851.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 454.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 239.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 864.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1268.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1870.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 223.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 431.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 846.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1251.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1851.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 217.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1250.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 864.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1267.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 461.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1862.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 440.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 236.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1843.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 849.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 461.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1859.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 250.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 871.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 233.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 857.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1262.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 455.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1275.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1876.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1266.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1242.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 1869.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 210.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 1841.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 426.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 224.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=50%: Week 834.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 856.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score Over Time>=30%: Week 447.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time

The WOMAC PF subscale consists of 17 questions assessing the participant's difficulty in performing activities of daily living due to OA in the target knee. Each question is scored on an NRS scale from 0 to 10, and the WOMAC PF subscale score is calculated as the mean score from all 17 questions, where higher scores represent worse function. Percentage of participants with \>= 30% and \>= 50% reductions in WOMAC physical function subscale over time are reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0; Day 1), Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 428.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 1842.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 214.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 1833.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 447.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 230.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 1234.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 850.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 833.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 1242.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 222.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 851.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 1872.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 1845.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 1272.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 864.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 1246.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 242.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 452.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 431.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 863.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 239.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 461.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 1267.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 1864.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 223.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 441.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 847.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 1250.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 1839.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 454.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 459.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 1272.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 869.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 1262.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 247.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 1874.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 1859.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 857.1 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 233.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 826.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 847.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 419.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 437.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 212.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 222.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 1834.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 1860.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=30%: Week 1254.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With >= 30% and >= 50% Reductions in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Over Time>=50%: Week 1235.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OA

The PGA of OA was a 5-point Likert scale used to assess symptoms and activity impairment due to OA of the knee. Participants were asked to identify a number from 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation to normal activities) to 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities) based on the question Considering all the ways that OA of the knee affects you, how are you feeling today?. Percentage of participants with improvement of \>= 2 points in PGA of OA at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 18 is reported.

Time frame: Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 1210.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 29.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 182.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 48.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 817.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 1218.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 823.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 426.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 1820.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 29.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 825.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 216.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 424.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 1220.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 1822.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 1825.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 212.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 1232.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 828.6 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 422.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 84.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 127.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 27.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 184.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Improvement of >= 2 Points in PGA of OAWeek 46.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Definition

The OMERACT-OARSI responder index is calculated from the WOMAC Pain subscale, the WOMAC Physical Function Subscale and the PGA of OA. A participant is classified as a responder if: 1. \>= 2-point absolute change from Baseline to Week X or a \>= 50% improvement is reported in the WOMAC Pain or the PF subscales; 2. At least 2 of the following 3 conditions are true: \>= 1-point absolute change from Baseline to Week X or \>= 20% improvement is reported in the WOMAC Pain subscale, \>= 1-point absolute change from Baseline to Week X or \>= 20% improvement is reported in the WOMAC PF subscale or \>= 1-point absolute change from Baseline to Week X is reported in the PGA of OA. Percentage of responder participants are reported.

Time frame: Weeks 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 8 (Day 56), 12 (Day 84), and 18 (Day 126)

Population: FAS included all randomized participants analyzed according to the intent-to-treat principle whereby randomized study treatment will be analyzed regardless of the study treatment actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 1259.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 247.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 1855.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 459.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 858.9 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 1280.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 880.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 467.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 1878.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 262.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 880.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 261.8 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 473.4 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 1280.0 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 1872.2 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 1880.5 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 259.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 1285.7 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 886.3 Percentage of participants
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Percentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 465.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 868.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 1267.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 240.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 1870.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Responder Participants Measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Responder Index Using Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) DefinitionWeek 463.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Serum Concentration of MEDI7352

Serum concentration of MEDI7352 is reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 7; pre-dose on Days 14, 28, 42, 56, and 70; and on Days 74, 77, 84, 126, and 224

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included participants who received at least one dose of double-blind study treatment per the protocol for whom any post-baseline PK data are available and who did not violate or deviate from the protocol in ways that would significantly affect the PK analyses. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes those participants who were analyzed for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who had adequate serum samples.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 2811.025 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 853.538
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 7326.863 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 98.989
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 425.895 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 846.517
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 1450.337 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 538.604
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 775.011 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1322.708
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 7410.943 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 1833.135
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 2828.332 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2745.856
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 566.625 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2133.678
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 7681.322 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 159.914
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 779.356 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3099.752
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 14144.242 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 475.607
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 4212.375 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 2578.767
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 7422.074 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 4305.129
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 5620.546 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13626.951
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 7017.124 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15147.088
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 72149.062 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 109.2763
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 74116.544 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 25316.322
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 14379.882 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 488.933
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 8410.482 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6086.596
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 2843.644 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6705.491
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 7747.108 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39692.068
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 4230.005 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11978.84
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 8443.062 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 13640.856
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 73582.265 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 364.2
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 14650.864 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 624.642
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 28222.665 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 3963.855
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 42116.951 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 14993.947
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 5685.779 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15987.305
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 7057.042 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18183.372
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 74551.099 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18558.506
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Serum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 77271.511 ng/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36387.885
UnknownSerum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 1 ng/mL
UnknownSerum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 126 ng/mL
UnknownSerum Concentration of MEDI7352Day 224 ng/mL
Secondary

Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over Time

The TNSn, is a semiquantitative clinical assessment of peripheral nervous system function. The TNSn assessment is collected as scores of motor symptom, autonomic symptom, pin sensibility, sensory symptom, and vibration sensibility score. Each neuropathy item is scored on a 0 to 4 scale with total score ranging from 0 to 20. Higher total scores correlate with more severe neuropathy.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -45 to Day -1), Weeks 0 (Day 1), 2 (Day 14), 4 (Day 28), 6 (Day 42), 8 (Day 56), 10 (Day 70), 12 (Day 84), 28 (Day 196), and 32 (Day 224)

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of any double-blind study drug and were analyzed according to the treatment they actually received. Number of participants analyzed (N) denotes the number of participants evaluated for this outcome measure. Number analyzed (n) denotes those participants who were evaluable at the specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 321.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 81.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 41.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.66
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 61.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 281.7 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeBaseline1.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 120.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 101.1 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 01.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.92
MEDl7352 Dose Level 1Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 21.1 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 21.6 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 81.1 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.86
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeBaseline1.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.94
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 01.7 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 61.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 101.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 121.2 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 321.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 283.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.69
MEDl7352 Dose Level 2Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 41.3 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeBaseline1.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 40.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.54
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 80.6 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 120.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.37
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 01.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.03
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 21.2 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.97
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 60.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 100.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.53
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 282.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.83
MEDl7352 Dose Level 3Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 320.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.88
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 60.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 21.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.7
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeBaseline1.2 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 100.7 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 01.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 120.7 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 280.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 320.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.64
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 80.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.62
MEDl7352 Dose Level 4Total Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 40.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.61
PlaceboTotal Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 01.8 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.26
PlaceboTotal Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 21.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
PlaceboTotal Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 121.1 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
PlaceboTotal Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 81.2 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.84
PlaceboTotal Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeBaseline1.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
PlaceboTotal Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 282.9 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
PlaceboTotal Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 321.0 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
PlaceboTotal Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 41.4 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.16
PlaceboTotal Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 101.1 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
PlaceboTotal Neuropathy Score-Nurse (TNSn) Over TimeWeek 61.5 Unit on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026