Skip to content

Understanding Non-radiotherapy-based Development of Trismus

Prospective Analysis of Epidemiological, Anatomical and Surgical Aspects Leading to a Limitation of the Opening of the Mouth Before and After Oral Cancer Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04670146
Enrollment
128
Registered
2020-12-17
Start date
2020-07-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2020-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Oral Cancer, Trismus

Brief summary

A limited mouth opening (or trismus) after surgery for oral cancers is not only one of the most common complications, but it is also a major contributing factor towards an impaired quality of life after surgery. The enormous impact on the quality of life is secondary to impeded speech, feeding, drinking, and aesthetics. The aim would be to analyse the opening of the mouth before and after surgery, and if applicable after radiotherapy, in a prospective way in oral cancer cases. There is namely a major discrepancy in current science research between the effect of different treatment modalities on trismus, as, in contrast with known research regarding the effect of surgery on trismus, a clear relation between radiotherapy and trismus has already been demonstrated in multiple research articles and systematic reviews. Nevertheless, the clinical experience of this research group supports the need for further investigation on the impact of surgery and the different modalities of surgery on trismus. The investigators are convinced that revealing the surgical factors, linked with trismus, can lead to better prevention and prediction of later trismus for newly diagnosed oral cancer patients.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTultrasound of the masseteric muscle

Ultrasound of the masseteric muscle to evaluate the thickness and rigidity of the masseteric muscle before and after oral cancer treatment. There will be no invasive investigation of the muscle.

Sponsors

KU Leuven
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients with a newly diagnosed oral cancer. * Cases with a limited mouth opening secondary to oral tumour resections

Exclusion criteria

* Minors. * Deceased cases within the follow-up period of one year. * Other malignancies than oral squamous cell carcinomas.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The evaluation of the maximal mouth opening.Follow-up of twelve months.A first endpoint would be to compare the effect of the epidemiological and surgical variables on the maximal mouth opening in millimeters over time.
A detailed quality of life assessment.Follow-up of twelve months.This research group would like to obtain a detailed image of the impact of trismus and oral cancer resections in general on the quality of life. Results will be based on validated and commonly used questionnaires addressing the different aspects of quality of life for this specific population. More specific the Washington questionnaire.
The correlation between the muscles of mastication and trismus.Follow-up of twelve months.Investigation of the relation between the muscles of mastication and the tumour and how this correlation influences the incidence of postsurgical trismus. Therefore, the distance between the tumor and the muscles of mastication will be evaluated in millimeters, based on 3D preoperative radiological imaging (CT or MRI).
An evaluation of the masseter muscle via ultrasound before and after oral tumor resections/trismus treatment.Follow-up of twelve months.The final endpoint will be the evaluation of masseter alterations on ultrasound, which will lead to an improved understanding of muscular changes due to oncological resections, radiotherapy, and trismus. Even though newer (IMRT or intensity-modulated radiation therapy) techniques in radiotherapy protect vital structures as much as possible, the masseter is still often involved in the radiated area and muscular alterations are anyhow to be expected. The endpoints will be alterations in masseter muscle thickness (millimeter) in all oral oncology cases, trismus patients secondary to oral oncology resections, and in adjuvant radiotherapy cases.
Correlation of the mouth opening with surgical variables.Follow-up of twelve months.The use of free vascularized grafts (primary closure/skin graft/composite grafts/soft tissue free flaps) and a neck dissection (yes/no) will be analyzed to identify an impact on the mouth opening of each surgical variable to prevent trismus in future cases. The information will be collected from the electronic patient file.
Correlation of the mouth opening with tumor stage.Follow-up of twelve months.The correlation between tumor stage(I-IV) (TNM-classification according to TNM-8 AJCC manual) and mouth opening will be analyzed. The information will be collected from the electronic patient file.
Correlation of the mouth opening with tumor recurrence.Follow-up of twelve months.An evaluation of the influence of tumor recurrence (yes/no) on the maximal mouth opening will be ordered. The information will be collected from the electronic patient file.
A detailed quality of life assessment regarding head and neck cancer treatment.Follow-up of twelve months.This research group would like to obtain a detailed image of the impact of trismus and oral cancer resections in general on the quality of life. Results will be based on validated and commonly used questionnaires addressing the different aspects of quality of life for this specific population. More specific the EORTC H&N 35.
A detailed quality of life assessment regarding the mouth opening.Follow-up of twelve months.This research group would like to obtain a detailed image of the impact of trismus and oral cancer resections in general on the quality of life. Results will be based on validated and commonly used questionnaires addressing the different aspects of quality of life for this specific population. More specific the Gothenburg questionnaire.

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026