Skip to content

Modified Cross Body Stretch Verses Modified Sleeper Stretch in Basketball Players for Posterior Capsule Tightness

Comparison of Modified Cross Body Stretch and Modified Sleeper Stretch in Basketball Players for Posterior Capsule Tightness in Basketball Players

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04668079
Enrollment
32
Registered
2020-12-16
Start date
2020-04-01
Completion date
2020-12-08
Last updated
2020-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Shoulder Capsulitis

Keywords

Modified cross body stretch, Modified sleeper stretch, Posterior capsule tightness, Range of motion, Seated basketball throw, Thumb up back

Brief summary

The aim of this research is to compare the effect of modified cross body stretch and modified sleeper stretch on pain, range of motion, disability and throwing ability in athletes with posterior capsule tightness. Randomized controlled trials done at International Islamic University. The sample size was 32. The subjects were divided in two groups, 16 subjects in modified cross body stretch group and 16 in modified sleeper stretch group. Study duration was of 6 months. Sampling technique applied was non probability connivance sampling technique. Tools used in the study are PENN shoulder score, gonoiometer, thumb up back(TUB) and seated basketball throw test(SBBT). Data was be analyzed through SPSS 21.

Detailed description

Basketball is considered as the highly demanding sports due to high demand and complexity of the game. The overhead throwing activities makes it more vulnerable to the injuries. In repetitive throwing there are different type of violet forces placed on shoulder joint It causes adaptation in soft tissue anatomically which in turn limits ROM of shoulder joint and Posterior shoulder tightness. Posterior capsule tightness can result due to abnormal humeral head motion which decreases subacromial space during overhead activities leading to compression of tissues causing limited shoulder flexion, internal rotation and horizontal adduction. Posterior capsule tightening occurs when the capsular tissue and musculature of the shoulder tighten, usually due to repeated overload in the eccentric portion of arm deceleration. This loss of internal rotation results from contracture and tightening of the posterior inferior portion of the glenohumeral joint capsule, which occurs from the repetitive microtrauma imparted during the deceleration phase of the throwing motion. Repetitive throwing motion creates adaptive increased external rotation and decreased internal rotation in the dominant shoulder joint which is termed as GIRD (Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit).Posterior capsule tightness is often treated without surgery. It can be treated by strengthening, stretching, neuromuscular control exercises. Strengthening protocol can perform specifically on Weak muscles by using resistance and weight. The neuromuscular training helps the body to act and react on different pattern of stress demand on it through neural pathways. The mainstay of the posterior capsule tightness treatment for athlete is the stretching of the posterior capsule. One author proposed the modified forms, the modified sleeper stretch and the modified cross body stretch. And found these modified stretching more effective and beneficial than the sleeper and cross body stretch Literature review: Kevin et al investigated the acute effects of sleeper stretch on posterior shoulder tightness and internal rotation of shoulder. There was significant improvement in results. A study conducted in 2018 to determine whether posterior shoulder stretch was effective in increasing internal rotation and horizontal adduction ROM in volleyball and tennis players with internal rotation deficit \>¬¬15 degrees. The intervention group performs the sleeper stretch daily for 8 weeks. Results showed significant improvement in internal rotation and horizontal adduction. Another article was published in 2014, with the aim to compare the effects of horizontal adduction stretch with scapular stabilization versus horizontal adduction stretch without scapular stabilization on posterior shoulder tightness and passive internal rotation. Results showed significant improvement among the scapular stabilization group. A RCT conducted in which each subject completed stretching interventions for two days. Purpose of the study was to investigate acute effects of modified sleeper stretch and modified cross body stretch on posterior shoulder tightness and glenohumral internal rotation deficit with more than 10-degree loss.

Interventions

OTHERModified cross body stretch

Athlete was in side lying positioned. trunk was moved posteriorly 200 to 300 and shoulder is raised to 900 and semi flex both knees. Athlete was ask to passively pull the humerus across the body into horizontal adduction with the opposite hand. 5 reps once daily 3 sets for 4 weeks was given

OTHERModified sleeper stretch

Athlete was in side lying positioned on the involved side, trunk was rolled posteriorly 200 to 300 and shoulder is raised to 900 and elbow is flexed to 900 and semiflex both knees. athlete was ask to perform internal rotation passively by using the opposite arm. 5 reps once daily 3 sets for 4 weeks was given

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Basketball Players * Internal rotation deficit greater than 20° degrees * BMI 18.5-24.9

Exclusion criteria

* Having a systemic pathology including inflammatory joint disease * Having musculoskeletal or neurological disease * Having taken anti-inflammatory medication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PENN shoulder score4th weekThe disability of shoulder conditions was measured by Penn score. Which consists of 3 categories i.e.; pain, satisfaction and functional ability. Pain consists of 3 questionnaires that consists of 10 scores each (total 30) and then satisfaction, it consists of 1 questionnaire consists of 10 scores, functional ability consists of 20 questionnaires with 10 scores each for the questionnaire (total 60)
Seated basketball throw4th weekSBBT (seated basketball throws) was used to test the explosiveness of the upper extremity.
Thumb up back(TUB)4th week(Thumb-up-the back- measurement) was used to measure the ability to actively move thumb up the back with the help of inch tape.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder ROM adduction4th weekChanges from the Baseline ROM range of Motion of shoulder adduction was taken with the Help of Goniometer
Shoulder ROM (flexion)4th weekChanges from the Baseline ROM range of Motion of Shoulder flexion was taken with the Help of Goniometer
Shoulder ROM internal rotation4th weekChanges from the Baseline ROM range of Motion of Shoulder internal rotation was taken with the Help of Goniometer
Shoulder ROM external rotation4th weekChanges from the Baseline ROM range of Motion of Shoulder external rotation was taken with the Help of Goniometer
Shoulder ROM Extension4th weekChanges from the Baseline ROM range of Motion of Shoulder extension was taken with the Help of Goniometer
Shoulder ROM abduction4th weekChanges from the Baseline ROM range of Motion of shoulder abduction was taken with the Help of Goniometer

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026