Skip to content

Tracers for Endometrial Cancer Sentinel Node Labeling

Prospective Observational Study on Sentinel Node Biopsy Using Two Concurrent Labelling Techniques (Radioactive Tracer With/Without Blue Dye vs. Indocyanine Green-ICG) in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer Patients (TESLA-1).

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04665544
Acronym
TESLA-1
Enrollment
83
Registered
2020-12-11
Start date
2021-01-01
Completion date
2024-01-01
Last updated
2021-06-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Cancer, Sentinel Lymph Node

Brief summary

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is currently used in the management of vulvar and breast cancers as well as in malignant melanoma, and is being intensively studied in patients with cervical and endometrial cancers. The role of lymphadenectomy in the surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer is still controversial. The main reason to perform a SLN biopsy is to detect the lymph node that will be the first involved with metastatic disease in the nodal basin. The SLN biopsy is performed after the SLN is located with the use of different tracers in a concept called SLN mapping. Moreover, SLN evaluation has been reported to improve the accuracy of lymph node staging due to SLN pathologic ultrastaging, which includes multiple serial sectioning and immunohistochemical assessment. The aim of this project is to conduct a multicentre, prospective, observational trial to compare two different SLN labelling methods (radioactive tracer with/without blue dye vs. indocyanine green-ICG) in the same patient and to evaluate the unilateral detection rate, sensitivity, number of detected SLN, anatomical localisation of detected SLN and bilateral detection rate of SLN. The main aim of the trial is the comparison of SLN mapping between two SLN labelling methods in the same patient. The trial will answer a question whether a combination of labelling methods in the same patient increase importantly the sensitivity of SLN biopsy. The trial has a high potential to reach the calculated number of cases and thus bring in evidence/data that will be essential for future management of SLN biopsies in endometrial cancer.

Interventions

PROCEDURESLN side-specific detection rate using radioactive tracer with/without blue dye and ICG tracer.

The primary objective of this study is to compare SLN detection rate using two types of intracervical tracers (radioactive tracer with or without blue dye vs. ICG). The null hypothesis is that the detectionrate does not differ between the two techniques.

Sponsors

University Medical Centre Maribor
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically proven endometrial cancer (any tumour type). * Apparent early-stage endometrial cancer with intermediate or high risk prognostic factors (deep myometrial invasion or G2/G3 disease or non- endometrioid histological type), no evidence of bulky or suspicious pelvic/para-aortic lymph nodes or distant metastases on preoperative conventional imaging studies; minimum requirement for clinical staging includes expert US or pelvic MRI for local staging and abdominal US or abdominal CT scan or PET CT for distant staging. * Performance status ECOG: 0-1. * Age ≥18, ≤85. * History of second primary cancer only if more than 5 years with no evidence of disease. * Approved and signed informed consent form to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Desire for fertility sparing * History of pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SLN unilateral detection rate2 yearsNumber of hemipelvises where the SLN was found/number of all hemipelvises for each tracer and combination of tracers

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity of SLN biopsy for pelvic lymph node staging. Anatomical localisation of detected SLN2 yearsNumber of true positive LN/(number of true positive LN+number of false negative LN) for each tracer and combination of tracers
Number of detected SLN.2 yearsAverage number of detected SLN (in the specimen, labelled with the tracer, there might be one or more LN; the number of removed LN is one of the quality indicator).
Descriptive meassure: Anatomical localisation of detected SLN2 yearsExact anatomical localisation of SLN (1-external iliac vessels, 2-internal iliac vessels, 3-obturator region, 4-paraaortic region, 5-presacral region).
Bilateral detection rate.2 yearsThe number of patients with bilateral SLN detection/the number of all patients for each tracer and combination of tracers

Countries

Czechia, Poland, Slovenia

Contacts

Primary ContactMaja Pakiž, MD, PhD
maja.pakiz@ukc-mb.si+38623212583
Backup ContactAndraž Dovnik, MD, PhD
andraz.dovnik@ukc-mb.si+38623212178

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026