Skip to content

Efficacy of Focused Shock Waves Combined With Adjuvant Therapy With Tendon Supplement

Efficacy of Focused Shock Waves Combined With Adjuvant Therapy With Tendon Supplement in the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: a Prospective Randomized Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04664712
Enrollment
44
Registered
2020-12-11
Start date
2019-09-11
Completion date
2020-11-20
Last updated
2020-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fasciitis, Plantar

Keywords

focused shock waves, tendinitis, natriuretics

Brief summary

Physical treatment with focused shock waves is effective in the treatment of tendonitis. Food supplements could facilitate the healing of tendinopathies when combined with shock wave therapy.

Detailed description

A single-blind, randomized prospective study (level of evidence IB) was designed. Patients with plantar fasciitis were recruited and randomized to group A and group B. Group A was treated with focused shock waves alone and group B with a combination of focused shock waves and tendon supplement. Pain remission (primary endpoint) and functional recovery (secondary endpoint) are monitored in both groups at three time points (Months 0, 3, and 6).

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTTendisulfur Pro

Dietary supplement based on Methylsulfonylmethane (2.5 g), hydrolyzed collagen (1 g), L-arginine (1 g), L-lysine (500 mg), Vitamin C (500 mg), Bromelain (200 mg), Chondroitin sulfate (150 mg), Glucosamine (150 mg) \[17, 18\], dry extracts of turmeric (100 mg), Boswellia (100 mg) and Myrrh (50 mg)

We delivered 2000 shots per session using a low/medium energy level (range between 0.01 and 0.175 milliJoule/mm2) depending on the patient's tolerance during treatment with a frequency of 4 Hz.

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* plantar heel pain diagnosed clinically and instrumentally (ultrasound) as plantar fasciitis, that has not responded to conservative treatment for at least six months;

Exclusion criteria

* History of previous fractures or ankle and heel surgery; * Recurrence of previous local painful episodes; * Lesion of the plantar fascia on US examination; * Presence of pathologies that affect the function of the foot (lumbar radiculopathy, Achilles tendinitis, Morton's neuroma, etc.); * Chronic inflammatory conditions such as psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic inflammatory bowel disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Visual Analogue Score (VAS)T0 (recruitment); T1 (three months)The pain was quantified using the VAS scale with the scores ranging between 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in American Foot & Ankle Score (AOFAS)T0 (recruitment); T2 (six months)The scores ranging between 100 (no disability) and 0 (maximum disability)
Change in Foot Function Index (FFI)T0 (recruitment); T2 (six months)The scores ranging between 100 (no disability) and 0 (maximum disability).
Roles & Maudsley (R&M)T1 (three months)Monitorization of the patient's perception of improvement, with the scores ranging from 1 (excellent) to 4 (minimum).

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026