Skip to content

Are You in a Poor Country; HIPEC is Still in Reach

Are You in a Poor Country; HIPEC is Still in Reach

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04664218
Enrollment
50
Registered
2020-12-11
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2020-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIPEC

Brief summary

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a well-known sequel of multiple abdominal malignancies either arising from the gastro-intestinal tract or of gynaecologic origin. On occurrence, PC is mostly considered as a very bad prognostic sign hence it affects the overall survival with very poor response to systemic chemotherapy. On introduction of the new concept of combined optimal cytoreduction (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), promising prognosis began to be shown. A major obstacle which may face application of HIPEC manoeuvre is the cost either of the machine or the disposable kit used in handling the chemotherapy, heating it and delivering it to the patient, hence we established our machine design with its disposable kits making it available for use in poor places.

Detailed description

As aforementioned the use of HIPEC technique offered a promising results in dealing with peritoneal carcinomatosis the high costs seems to be a considerable obstacle in some poor places so we inented a machine with considerably lower costs both in the machine composition and its disposable kit used for every patient we used it for six years in a trial to find any shortage, obstacles or any technical, therapeutic or financial drawbacks compared to the published data of the standard machines

Interventions

DEVICEHIPEC device

To report the affordability on using the HIPEC machine of our design compared to the standard ones in poor places.

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient candidate for HIPEC procedure

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to HIPEC procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thermal efficiency of the machine6 years of the study using the machineThe ability of the machine to warm the chemoperfusate to 43 c for 90 minutes (the duration of peritoneal perfusion)
Electrical efficiency of the machine6 years of the study using the machineReporting any interruption or unexplained stop of the thermostat resulting in stopping of chemoperfusate flow to and out of the abdomen during the 90 minutes of the maneuver
The manufacturing costs in US dollarone weak at the start of the trialthe costs paid by the owner of manufacturing the machine throughout collecting its components and technical fitting them into a machine
The disposable costs in US dollar6 years of the study using the machinethe costs spent by the patient at each use paid for the disposable parts of the machine of the chemotherapy perfusion circuit to and from the patient

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse effects on the patient following HIPEC4 weeksfollowing the patient in the postoperative period searching for adverse effects of HIPEC resulting from either the chemotherapy used or the physical activity of the machine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026