Skip to content

Dyadic Approach To Active Living and Eating Healthy: The DATE Study

Dyadic Approach To Active Living and Eating Healthy: a Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dyadic Health Behavior Change Intervention vs. Nutrition Education for Older Adult Obese Couples

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04660968
Acronym
DATE
Enrollment
70
Registered
2020-12-09
Start date
2020-12-15
Completion date
2024-11-15
Last updated
2023-02-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Brief summary

The purpose of the DATE study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability and a preliminary evaluation of the efficacy of a dyadic health behaviour change intervention to improve healthy eating, physical activity, and dyadic coping among older obese couples. This novel intervention will use a dyadic adaptation of common health behaviour change strategies and will promote a dyadic coping approach to health behaviour change that emphasize partners' interdependence and shared responsibility for the creation of a home environment conducive to a healthy lifestyle. For this project 35 obese older adults cohabiting dyads will be randomized to either the couples-based dyadic health behaviour change intervention or a couples-based nutrition counselling control condition.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDyadic health behaviour change intervention

The dyadic behaviour change intervention adopts a dyadic coping perspective wherein appraisal of shared responsibility, agreement on tasks, and collaboration are fostered throughout the intervention. The intervention will target four behaviour goals: reducing overall caloric intake, substituting empty calorie foods with healthier alternatives, reducing sedentary behaviour, and increasing physical activity. The specific behavioural change strategies will include motivational interviewing, self-monitoring, goal setting, stimulus control, problem solving, and relapse prevention. Each session will also include a short education component on healthy eating to improve participants' adherence to the updated Canada's Food Guide. Participants will have access to web-based exercise training sessions. Intervention sessions will be delivered online.

BEHAVIORALDyadic nutrition counselling intervention

The couples-based education nutrition intervention will provide extensive information on healthy eating. However, it will not include any behavioural change principles. Topics will be based on Dietitians of Canada's Practice-based Evidence in Nutrition (PEN) discussions in the database that focus on healthy eating for older adults. The topics covered will include increasing fruits and vegetables, hidden (empty) calories, how to read food labels, portion control, reducing salt and saturated fat, plant-based proteins, and eating for healthy bones. Participants in this group will also be told to increase their levels of physical activity to 150 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per week, as per the Canadian Guidelines. Participants will have access to web-based exercise training sessions. However, physical activity will not be discussed explicitly during the intervention. Intervention sessions will be delivered online.

Sponsors

Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de Montreal
CollaboratorOTHER
Concordia University, Montreal
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* At least one of the partners is retired * Partners cohabitating for at least 2 years. * Obesity: BMI between 30-45 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

1. Currently enrolled in a weight loss program 2. On a special diet 3. Eating disorder 4. Uncontrolled diabetes 5. Stroke 6. Heart problems (heart attack, heart failure, surgery of the heart or of the carotid arteries, pacemaker) 7. Other medical issues or medical treatment that would prevent doing physical activity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Healthy Eating IndexBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsCanadian adaptation of the Healthy Eating Index based on a 3-day food diary

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in weight (kg)Baseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsBody weight assessed using a digital scale
Change in waist circumference (cm)Baseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsWaist circumference assessed using a measuring tape anchored at the top of the hip bone.
Change in Relationship SatisfactionBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsRelationship satisfaction assessed using the Couples Satisfaction Index-4 (total score ranges from 0-21, with higher scores indicating greater relationship satisfaction).
Change in Dyadic CopingBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsDyadic coping assessed using the Common Dyadic Coping subscale of the Dyadic Coping Inventory (total score ranges from 0-30, with higher scores indicating common more dyadic coping).
Change in Spousal Social Support for DietBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsDiet social support assessed using the spousal version of the Social Support for Diet (total score ranges from 0 to 50 with higher scores indicating greater social support for diet).
Change in Spousal Social Support for ExerciseBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsSpousal social support for exercise assessed using the spousal version of the Social Support for Exercise scale (total score ranges from 0 to 60 with higher scores indicating greater social support for exercise).
Change in Communal CopingBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsCommunal coping assessed using a home-made communal coping scale (total score range from 6-60 with higher score indicating greater communal coping).
Change in Autonomy SupportBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsAutonomy support assessed using the spousal version for the Important Other Climate Questionnaire (total scores 6-42, with higher scores indicating more autonomy support).
Change in Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity (minutes per day)Baseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsObjective physical activity assessed using accelerometry for 7 consecutive days.
Change in self-reported physical ActivityBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsSelf-reported physical activity assessed using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (total score ranges from 0 to 793, with higher scores indicating greater physical activity).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Action PlanningBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsAction planning assessed using a home-made questionnaire based on the Health Action Process Approach (total score ranges from 0-54, with greater score indicating more action planning).
Changes in Functional FitnessBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsFunctional fitness assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (total score ranges from 0-12 with higher score indicating better functional fitness).
Changes in Maximal Handgrip Strength (kg)Baseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsMaximal handgrip strength assessed using a hand dynamometer.
Changes in Sleep QualityBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsSleep quality assessed using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (total score ranges 0 to 21, with higher score indicating poorer sleep quality)
Changes in Depressive SymptomsBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsDepressive symptoms assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Study-Depression (total score ranges 0 to 60, with higher score indicating more depressive symptoms)
Changes in Self-Efficacy for ExerciseBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsSelf-Efficacy for Exercise assessed using the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (total score ranges from 5-25, with higher score indicating greater exercise self-efficacy).
Changes in Self-Efficacy for DietBaseline, 4 months, 7 months, 16 monthsSelf-Efficacy for Diet assessed using the Weight Efficacy LifeStyle Questionnaire (total score ranges from 0-180, with higher score indicating greater diet self-efficacy).

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026