Skip to content

A Comparison of the Long Term Effects of the Traditional and Modified Posterior Shoulder Stretching Exercise in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

A Comparison of the Long Term Effects of the Traditional and Modified Posterior Shoulder Stretching Exercise on Shoulder Mobility, Pain, Ultrasonographic Parameters, Proprioception, Strength, Functionality, and Disability Level in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04660682
Enrollment
60
Registered
2020-12-09
Start date
2021-09-21
Completion date
2024-09-21
Last updated
2024-11-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

Keywords

Glenohumeral Internal Rotation Deficit, Modified Cross-body Stretching

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the long term effects of traditional and modified static cross-body posterior shoulder stretching training in individuals with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) having glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD). Modified cross body posterior shoulder stretching group will receive static stretching in the modified cross-body stretching position and standard physiotherapy program. The traditional cross body posterior shoulder stretching group will receive static stretching and standard physiotherapy program. The Control group will receive only sham stretching and standard physiotherapy program.

Detailed description

SIS is the most common cause of pain and shoulder dysfunction. The etiology of SIS depends on many factors including tightness of the posterior shoulder structures. Posterior shoulder tightness (PST) narrows the subacromial space and forces anterior-superior migration of the humeral head over the glenoid fossa and, it could cause limitation of the internal rotation (IR) and horizontal adduction range of motion (ROM). GIRD is known as loss of IR ROM in the glenohumeral joint. In the SIS, limitation IR ROM has been reported. Supraspinatus tendon thickness can change, subacromial space may become narrower and joint position sense (JPS) could be decreased in SIS patients. The effectiveness of traditional static cross body posterior shoulder stretching on various parameters such as shoulder rotational ROM or pain was studied and proved in the literature. Traditional static cross body posterior shoulder stretching could reduce subacromial symptoms and improve shoulder ROM with some disadvantages such as inadequate control of the scapula and glenohumeral rotation. To prevent accessory abduction of the scapula, restrict the external rotation ROM of the humerus and provide isolated posterior capsule stretching, Wilk et al. (2013) recommend the use of modified cross-body stretching for IR ROM increase. In the modified cross-body position, the patient is positioned in a more advantageous way. In the literature, although modified cross-body posterior stretching seems effective on SIS symptoms there is no research about the comparison of the long-term effects of the traditional and modified static cross-body posterior shoulder stretching exercises in individuals with SIS having GIRD. Therefore, whether modified stretching is superior to traditional stretching is not known. Our study aims to investigate and compare the long term effects of the traditional static cross-body posterior shoulder stretching exercise and modified static cross-body posterior shoulder stretching exercise in individuals with SIS having GIRD on shoulder IR ROM, GIRD, PST, pain, external rotation ROM, JPS, subacromial space, supraspinatus tendon thickness, posterior capsule thickness, the occupational ratio of the supraspinatus tendon in the subacromial space, muscle strength and shoulder function and disability level. Stretching groups will receive either traditional or modified static cross-body posterior shoulder stretching exercise and standard physiotherapy program. The Control group will receive only sham stretching and standard physiotherapy program. Standard physiotherapy program consists of electrotherapy, posture, proprioceptive, and strengthening exercises. The treatment program will be performed 5 days a week under the physiotherapist's supervision and 2 days a week as a home program for 8 weeks.

Interventions

OTHERModified static cross-body posterior shoulder stretching

For the modified cross-body position patient will be positioned in the side-lying position to limit the scapular abduction, and the patient aligned his/her forearms to limit the ER of the humerus while moving into horizontal adduction (HAdd). First, we will ask the patient to pull his/her arm into HAdd to the physiological barrier of the ROM, and then the patient will perform active-assistive static stretching with the help of the other hand for 30 seconds. The stretching will perform five repetitions with 10-sec rest between stretches. Each stretching will begin from a new physiological barrier of the HAdd ROM. Patients will also receive the standard physiotherapy program consists of physical agents, posture, proprioceptive, and strengthening exercises. The treatment program will be performed 5 days a week under the physiotherapist's supervision and 2 days a week as a home program for 8 weeks.

OTHERTraditional static cross-body posterior shoulder stretching

For the traditional static cross-body posterior shoulder stretching, in the standing position, the patient will perform cross-body stretch alone by active-assistive pulling the humerus across the body into HAdd with the opposite arm, without concern for scapular stabilization for 30 sec. The stretching will perform five repetitions with 10-sec rest between stretches. Each stretching will begin from a new physiological barrier of the HAdd ROM. Patients will also receive the standard physiotherapy program consists of physical agents, posture, proprioceptive, and strengthening exercises. The treatment program will be performed 5 days a week under the physiotherapist's supervision and 2 days a week as a home program for 8 weeks.

OTHERControl Group

In sham stretching, the patient will be positioned in the traditional static cross body posterior shoulder stretching position, and then the patient will perform active-assistive HAdd ROM without enough stretching of the relevant tissue. Active assistive ROM will be stopped before reaching the individual PST measurement result (in this way, sham stretching will be performed without proper stretching of the relevant tissue). The HAdd ROM exercise will be performed 5 times. Patients will also receive the standard physiotherapy program consists of physical agents, posture, proprioceptive, and strengthening exercises. The treatment program will be performed 5 days a week under the physiotherapist's supervision and 2 days a week as a home program for 8 weeks.

Sponsors

Dokuz Eylul University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

All of the participants must have subacromial impingement syndrome with glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (Bilateral IRROM difference ≥ 15º )

Intervention model description

There are 3 groups. The first group will receive the modified static cross-body posterior shoulder stretching and the standard physiotherapy program. The second group will receive traditional static cross-body posterior shoulder stretching and the standard physiotherapy program. The Control group will receive sham stretching and the standard physiotherapy program. In standard physiotherapy program, there are TENS, hot-pack, posture, proprioceptive, and strengthening training. The treatment program will last for eight weeks. Patients will receive the treatment program 5 days a week under the physiotherapist's supervision and 2 days a week as a home program.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome * Glenohumeral internal rotation range of motion of the affected shoulder should be less than other shoulder and bilateral shoulder internal rotation range of motion difference should be ≥15 º * Pain with resisted arm elevation or external rotation as well as a minimum of 3 of 5 positive subacromial impingement syndrome tests, painful arc, pain or weakness with resisted external rotation, Neer, Hawkins and Jobe tests . * Ability to complete the entire study procedure

Exclusion criteria

* A 50% limitation of passive shoulder range of motion in \>2 planes of motion * Pain \>7/10 * A history of fracture to the shoulder girdle * Systemic musculoskeletal disease * History of shoulder surgery, * Glenohumeral instability (positive apprehension, relocation or positive sulcus test) or positive findings for a full thickness rotator cuff tear (positive lag sign, positive drop arm test, or marked weakness with shoulder external rotation)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shoulder internal rotation range of motionBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of shoulder internal rotation range of motion (with bubble inclinometer)
Glenohumeral internal rotation deficitBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (with bubble inclinometer)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Joint position senseBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of shoulder joint repositioning angle errors for external rotation 0-45 degree, for internal rotation 0-45 degree, for scapular plane elevation 0-100 degree (with bubble inclinometer)
Isometric strengthBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of shoulder abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation isometric strength (in kg, with hand held dynamometer)
Subacromial spaceBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of subacromial space at neutral (0 degree), 30, 45, and 60-degree scapular plane elevation(with Ultrasound)
Supraspinatus tendon thicknessBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of supraspinatus tendon thickness (with Ultrasound)
Posterior shoulder tightnessBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of posterior shoulder tightness (with bubble inclinometer)
Posterior capsule thicknessBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of posterior capsule thickness (with Ultrasound)
Occupational ratio of the supraspinatus tendon in the acromial-humeral spaceBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of occupational rate of the supraspinatus tendon in the acromial-humeral space
Shoulder FunctionBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of Modified Constant-Murley Score
Upper extremity functionBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score
Shoulder external rotation range of motionBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of shoulder external rotation range of motion (with bubble inclinometer)
Pain intensityBaseline, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeksChange of visual analog scale score in activity and rest

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026