Skip to content

Early Intervention in Remote Autism (IPAAD)

Early Remote Intervention in Autism: a Randomized Noninferiority Clinical Trial Comparing Semi-intensive Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) Intervention With Remote Parental Training/ Supervision Versus Intensive ESDM Intervention.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04660669
Acronym
IPAAD
Enrollment
90
Registered
2020-12-09
Start date
2026-12-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Early Intervention in Remote Autism

Keywords

Autism, ASD, ESDM, MOOC

Brief summary

The Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) has shown its efficiency in the early management of ASD. The study aims to evaluate the efficiency of a new type of management based on a semi-intensive center-based intervention (8h per week) coupled with a MOOC (Massive Online Open Course: a teaching and learning intervention based on instrumental and interactive teaching situations) for remote parental training/supervision. The goal is to determine if compared to the ESDM reference intervention (15h per week), this type of care can bring, a sufficient improvement in child development course and decreased symptoms of autism in young children, and if it could be, therefore, better suited to the needs of children and their family, bypassing the previously stated obstacles.

Interventions

OTHERESDM intervention

Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) intervention with remote parental training/ supervision versus intensive ESDM intervention.

OTHERMOOC

Massive Online Open Course: a teaching and learning intervention based on instrumental and interactive teaching situations

Sponsors

University Hospital, Brest
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Group 1 receives 15 hours per week of ESDM intervention from ESDM therapists. The parents benefit from a 20 hour parent training program delivered in the participating center. Group 2 receives 8 hours per week of ESDM intervention from ESDM therapists in addition to whatever community service the parents choose. The parents benefit from a training program remotely delivered via a MOOC platform as well as parental supervision of sessions delivered at home 1 hour per week for the duration of the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Months to 36 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of ASD based on the Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria; 2. Diagnosis of ASD on the Autism Diagnosis Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) and Autism Diagnosis Interview (ADIR) for toddlers (we will include children above or equal to 13, which is the research cut-off); 3. Aged between 15 and 36 months; 4. DQ of 30 or above at the MSEL 5. Sign informed consent form by both parents

Exclusion criteria

1. A neurodevelopmental disorder with known etiology (e.g. fragile X syndrome, Rett syndrom) 2. Significant sensory or motor impairment 3. Major physical problems such as a chronic serious health condition 4. History of a serious head injury and/or neurologic disease 5. Seizures at time of entry 6. Use of psychoactive medications (7 ) Families unavailable for the intervention and the followup over a period of 12 months (8) Impossibility for family to have access to the MOOC

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The gain in developmental quotient measured using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL)From day 0 to months 12Minimum = 49 (worse outcome) and maximum = 155 (better outcome)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of child autism symptoms and change in autism symptoms using ADOS-2At baseline, 6 months after the set up of the intervention and at 12 months after the set up of the interventionMinimum = 0 (better outcome) and maximum = 28 (worse outcome)
Assessment of child behavioral adaptation using The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales second version (VABS-2)At baseline, 6 months after the set up of the intervention and at 12 months after the set up of the interventionMinimum = 20 (worse outcome) and maximum = 160 (better outcome)
Assessment of sensory reactivity using The Dunn's Sensory Profile for toddlersAt baseline, 6 months after the set up of the intervention and at 12 months after the set up of the interventionMinimum = 38 (worse outcome) and maximum = 190 (better outcome)
Assessment of the parent burden and quality of life using the CareQuol-7DAt baseline, 6 months after the set up of the intervention and at 12 months after the set up of the interventionMinimum = 0 (worse outcome) and maximum = 100 (better outcome)

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTNathalie LAVENNE, Doctor
nathalie.lavenne-collot@chu-brest.fr02 98 01 50 47
CONTACTAdrien CLARYSSE
adrien.clarysse@chu-brest.fr02 29 02 00 88
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNathalie LAVENNE

CHRU BREST

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 9, 2026