Skip to content

Clinical Outcomes of Maitland's Mobilization in Patients With Myofacial Chronic Neck Pain

Clinical Outcomes of Maitland's Mobilization in Patients With Myofacial Chronic Neck Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04660292
Enrollment
30
Registered
2020-12-09
Start date
2020-08-01
Completion date
2020-10-30
Last updated
2020-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myofascial Pain Syndrome of Neck

Keywords

Neck Pain, Manual mobilization, Isometric exercise, Triger points, Visual analog scale

Brief summary

Myofacial neck pain is a common musculoskeletal problem caused by presence of trigger points and local and referred pain patterns. Chronic neck pain is responsible for the involvement of joints, ligaments, fascia and connective tissue as well. The objective of this study was to assess the impacts of Maitland's mobilization in patients with myofacial chronic neck pain. Maitland's mobilization is one of the most common manual therapy approaches used by physiotherapists. Maitland's techniques involve the application of passive and accessory oscillatory movements to spinal and vertebral joints to treat pain and stiffness. In this randomized, placebo treatment controlled trial, 30 patients consecutively aged 25-45 years meeting inclusion criteria were isolated into two groups. The study group was treated with Maitland's mobilization consistently for 8 weeks while the control group got placebo treatment for a similar time frame. Visual analog Scale (VAS), Neck disability index (NDI) and cervical range of motion (ROM) questionnaire was filled by patients before, intermediate and after the intervention to evaluate the severity of pain, functional ability and range of motion.

Interventions

OTHERMaitland's mobilization

Maitland's techniques involve the application of passive and accessory oscillatory movements to spinal and vertebral joints to treat pain and stiffness.It has Five grades

OTHERTraditional Physical therapy

BASELINE TREATMENT INCLUDES TENS and Hot PACKS

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients age between 25-45 years old, * Bilateral pain involving the upper trapezius and elevator muscle of the scapula; * Duration of pain of at least 3 months; * A pain intensity corresponding to at least 2 cm on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS); -Neck pain with symptoms provoked by either neck postures or neck movement; * Pain localized at least in the cervical and occipital regions but not in the orofacial region; --Neck disability index (NDI) greater than or equal to 15 points; * Restricted cervical range of movements (flexion, extension, rotation, and side-bending); ---Presence of bilateral MTrPs in upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria

* A history of traumatic injuries (e.g., contusion, fracture, and whiplash injury); * Systemic diseases such as fibromyalgia, systemic erythematous lupus and arthritis; * Neurologic disorders (e.g., trigeminal neuralgia or occipital neuralgia); * Concomitant medical diagnosis of any primary headache (tension type or migraine); * Cervical spine surgery; and clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue Scale2 monthsIts a pain rating Scale Scoring between 0-10.O means no pain 10 means worse pain
Neck disability Index2 monthsEach section is scored on a 0 to 5 rating scale, in which zero means 'No pain' and 5 means 'Worst imaginable pain'.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026