Skip to content

Turkish Adaptation of Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control Scale

Turkish Adaptation, Validity and Reliability of Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo) Into in Infants With Down Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04657276
Enrollment
27
Registered
2020-12-08
Start date
2021-06-01
Completion date
2022-12-30
Last updated
2026-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Down Syndrome

Brief summary

In infants with Down syndrome at risk in terms of neurosensory motor development retardation, the level of trunk control can determine the level of trunk control towards motor development in infants with down syndrome. For this reason, the purpose of this study is to adapt the segmental assessment of trunk control scale to Turkish by evaluating the motor development in children with Down syndrome. It is the investigation of validity and reliability.

Detailed description

Independent sitting of babies with Down syndrome is very important because sitting is the primary position on improving play activities. It is a known fact that late acquisition of sitting posture has negative effects on gross motor skills such as crawling and walking as well as fine motor skills. The extent to which trunk development affects the developmental stages of the child and his performance in motor behaviors and skills should be evaluated. At the same time, trunk control should be evaluated at various periods in order to determine early intervention and treatment strategies in babies with Down syndrome who are at risk for motor development.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 24 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Volunteer parents who have; * Infant with down syndrome

Exclusion criteria

* Have a serious medical history (serious cardiac problems, infantile spasm, leukemia) * Presence of MSS and PSS-related problems * Those with visual and auditory problems * Having epileptic seizures * Presence of musculoskeletal problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Segmental Assesment of Trunk Control20 minutesIt is an evaluation method that allows to evaluate the body control as static, active and reactive control, according to the body control levels. Examines the development of trunk control from level 1 (head control) and level 7 (full trunk control).
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88)30 minutesThe Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) is an assessment tool designed and evaluated to measure changes in gross motor function over time or with intervention in children with cerebral palsy. tem scoring is the same for the GMFM-88. There is a scoring system with each item scored as 0, 1, 2, 3, or "not tested". A scoring key of 0 - does not initiate, 1 - initiates, 2 - partially completes, and 3 - completed, is used. High total score represents good development.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory-PedsQL15 minutesPedsQL ™ Infant Scale On the PedsQL Generic Core Scales, for ease of interpretability, items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, so that higher scores indicate better HRQOL
Alberta Infant Motor Scale20 minutesAlberta Infant Motor Scale The total raw score is the sum of the scores for the four positions, which can range between 0 to 58; higher scores indicate better motor development. The total raw score is converted to an age-based percentile rank, varying from 5 to 90% for comparison norms

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026