Skip to content

Triple Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Participants

Triple thErapy in paTients With COPD Under Real lIve Setting (the TETRIS Study)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04657211
Acronym
TETRIS
Enrollment
1212
Registered
2020-12-08
Start date
2021-01-14
Completion date
2024-07-01
Last updated
2025-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Keywords

COPD, LABA, LAMA, ICS, TETRIS

Brief summary

TETRIS is a multi-center, prospective observational cohort study. It will include participants with COPD who are on an existing combined treatment of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long-acting beta 2 agonists (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).

Detailed description

COPD is a disabling respiratory disease characterized by airflow obstruction and associated symptoms, including breathing difficulties caused by shortness of breath and wheezing, airway hyperactivity, chronic cough, sputum production, exercise intolerance, and poor quality of life. In accordance with the GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) recommendations, it is important to assess the characteristics and treatment patterns of participants prior to triple therapy initiation, in order to determine adherence to these guidelines and understand how participants progress to triple therapy. Despite a clearly defined guidance from GOLD treatment recommendations for the initiation and maintenance of triple therapy, treatment changes in Germany, including de-escalation, are often seen in treatment reality. This study is intended to gain a better understanding of what influences the treatment decision of German physicians in primary and secondary care under real life conditions, to elicit the reasons for treatment changes and to describe long-term outcomes with participants initiated on triple therapy over a period of two years. This study will also describe the temporal dynamics of treatment pattern and to unravel potentially complex participant's journeys in different German regions and also to identify and follow-up a variety of 'treatable traits' in COPD participants, which when modified may lead to improved health outcomes.

Interventions

prospective observational cohort study

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant is at least 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent. * Participant is on a SITT or MITT for treatment of an obstructive respiratory disease for a period of 6 to 18 weeks prior enrolment with a combination of inhaled LAMA, LABA and ICS either on a triple maintenance treatment or an intermediate triple therapy regime (ICS on/off or LAMA on/off). * Inclusion criteria for Group A- (treatment by settled general practitioners): Participants are treated according to a physicians diagnosis of COPD. * Inclusion criteria for Group B and C- (treatment by settled pulmonologists or treatment by outpatient lung centers): Participants have a confirmed physician's diagnosis (diagnosis based on spirometry or body plethysmography) of COPD. * Participants need to give and be capable of giving signed informed consent form (ICF).

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has a diagnosis of pure asthma, without clinical features of COPD. * Participant has a current diagnosis of lung cancer or lung metastasis. * Participant has a current primary diagnosis of diffuse pan-bronchiolitis, or a primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis or pulmonary fibrosis or cystic fibrosis or other significant respiratory disorders. * Participant is currently enrolled or has participated in a study within the last 90 days before signing of consent involving investigational study treatment intervention. If, while enrolled in the present study, the participant enrolls in another study involving investigational study treatment intervention, he/she will be withdrawn from the present study. * Recent (\<= months) major cardiac or pulmonary event (for example myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 6 MonthsFrom Day 1 (Month 1) up to 6 monthsPercentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 6 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 12 MonthsFrom Day 1 (Month 1) up to 12 monthsPercentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 12 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 24 MonthsFrom Day 1 (Month 1) up to 24 monthsPercentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 24 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time to Stop Triple TherapyUp to 24 monthsTime to stop triple therapy refers to the time duration from visit 1 at which a triple therapy (SITT or MITT) was safely and appropriately discontinued because its intended goals had been achieved, or no longer attainable, or risks outweighed the benefits. It was evaluated by Kaplan-Maier analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)COPD was classified using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Participants were classified based on symptom and risk of exacerbation, where GOLD 1 (mild COPD), GOLD 2 (moderate COPD), GOLD 3 (severe COPD) and GOLD 4 (very severe COPD). Data for percentage of participants with COPD symptom and risk classes (GOLD 1, GOLD 2, GOLD 3, and GOLD 4) have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)COPD was classified using the GOLD criteria. Participants are classified based on symptoms and risk of exacerbation, where GOLD A=Few symptoms low risk, GOLD B= More symptoms low risk, GOLD C= Few symptoms high risk and GOLD D= More symptoms high risk. Data for percentage of participants with COPD symptom and risk classes (GOLD A, GOLD B, GOLD C, and GOLD D) have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24At Months 6, 12 and 24Percentage of participants with non-missing concomitant respiratory medication received during the study are presented. Percentage of participants were categorized by the substance class of concomitant respiratory medication received by them which included oral glucocorticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonist, oral betamimetics, immunotherapy, antibiotics for respiratory indications, and other substances with cardiac or respiratory effects. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants by Their Duration of Triple Therapy Before Study StartUp to 48 weeks before study start (Day 1 of Month 1)Data for percentage of participants by their duration of triple therapy before study start have been presented. Data was categorized into following categories according to duration of triple therapy they received prior to study start: \<3 months, 3 to \<6 months, \>=6 months. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24At Months 6, 12 and 24Percentage of participants were categorized by their smoking status as Lifelong non-smoker, Current smoker and Previous smoker. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With a Lifelong Non-smoking History at BaselineAt Baseline (Day 1)Percentage of participants with a lifelong non-smoking history at Baseline have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsBaseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12, and 24FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FEV1 and FVC was measured using spirometry. FEV1/FVC ratio was calculated as FEV1/FVC ratio=FEV1/FVC\*100. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage of participants with FEV1/FVC value \<0.7 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA)Up to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with change from triple to dual therapy and back to triple therapy (at least one re-escalation) during a 24-month observation period after study enrollment have been presented. Data has been presented in categories split by the type of dual therapy (LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA) received by participant after change from triple therapy. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24Up to 24 months prior to Baseline (Day 1); Up to 3 months prior to Month 6; Up to 3 months prior to Month 12; Up to 3 months prior to Month 24Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage of participants with any moderate/severe exacerbation in the 24 months prior to Baseline or 3 months prior to each subsequent on-study visits at Months 6, 12 and 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationBaseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12, and 24The CAT is a validated measure of health status in COPD. The CAT is an 8-item, patient-completed instrument that covers symptoms such as cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, and disease impacts including physical activity, confidence, sleep and energy. Participants rate their experience on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment), higher score indicates greater impairment. A CAT sum score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the eight items with a scoring range of 0 (no disease impact) to 40 (maximum disease impact). Higher scores indicated greater disease impact. CAT sum score interpreted as \<=10: low impact level, 11-19: Medium impact level, \>=20: high impact level. Data for percentage of participants with CAT sum score of \<=10, 11-19, and \>=20 have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsAt Months 6, 12, and 24Percentage of participants with peripheral blood EOS count of \<300 cells/uL and \>=300 cells/uL have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Bronchitis PhenotypeUp to 24 monthsChronic bronchitis phenotype is one of the 'treatable traits' in COPD participants, which - when modified - might lead to improved health outcomes. Percentage of participants with chronic bronchitis phenotype have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA)/Long-acting Beta Agonist (LABA) From Months 6 to 24Months 6 to 24Percentage of participants with at least one switch from triple therapy to LAMA/LABA from Months 6 to 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA From Months 6 to 24Months 6 to 24Percentage of participants with at least one switch from triple therapy to ICS/LABA from Months 6 to 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupUp to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with reasons to start COPD triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. Reasons to start COPD triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons have been presented in separate categories. Also, data has been presented by type of physician (general practitioners \[GP\] and pneumologists) who documented these reasons. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by SITT and MITT)Up to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with change from triple to dual therapy and back to triple therapy (re-escalation) during a 24-month observation period after study enrollment have been presented. Data has been presented in categories split by the type of triple therapy (SITT and MITT) initiated by participants prior to change. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation PeriodUp to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with at least one change in their triple therapy from MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT during a 24-month observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation PeriodUp to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with at least one change within their type of triple therapy - from SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT during a 24-month observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Change From Once Daily to Twice Daily or Twice Daily to Once Daily MedicationUp to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with change from once daily to twice daily or twice daily to once daily medication has been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With a Change Between Different Inhaler TypesUp to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with a change between different inhaler types have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupUp to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with prespecified reasons to change a triple therapy (TT) (either MITT or SITT) by type of physician group have been presented. Reasons to change a triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Also, data has been presented by type of physician (general practitioners \[GP\] and pneumologists). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsUp to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with reasons for change in their triple therapy to another triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. Reasons for change in triple therapy to another triple therapy were documented in medical records by physician. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationUp to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with reasons for change from triple therapy to therapy de-escalation in overall participants group have been presented. A participant was classified as de-escalation, if there was at least one change from triple therapy to a therapy with just two components within the first 365 days of observation. Reasons for change from triple therapy to therapy de-escalation were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyUp to 24 monthsPercentage of participants with reasons to change de-escalated therapy back to triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. A participant was classified as de-escalation, if there was at least one change from triple therapy to a therapy with just two components within the first 365 days of observation. Reasons to change de-escalated therapy back to triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryUp to 24 monthsThe annual rate of moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations during the study period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of moderate and severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of moderate or severe exacerbation/total person years. Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Data for mean annual rate of moderate and/or severe exacerbations is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral EOS count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking status (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalizations Due to Severe ExacerbationsUp to 24 monthsSevere exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Annualized rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual hospitalization rate equal to (=) number of hospitalizations due to severe exacerbations divided by (/) total person years.
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 6 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 12FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 12 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 24FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 24 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 6 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 12FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 12 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 24FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 24 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From BaselineBaseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12 and 24Change in COPD symptoms were evaluated through COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and were categorized as stable symptoms, less symptoms, and more symptoms by comparing with Baseline. Percentage of participants with change in COPD symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 from Baseline have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) at Months 12 and 24Baseline (Day 1), Months 12 and 24EQ-5D-5L is self-assessment questionnaire,consisting of 5 items covering 5 dimensions (mobility,self care,usual activities,pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension is measured by 5-point Likert scale (1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Each of these 5 figure health states were converted to a single index score by applying country-specific value set formula that attaches weights to dimensions and levels. Range for EQ-5D-5L index score is -0.594 (worst health) to 1 (full health state). Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Important DeteriorationUp to 24 monthsClinically important deterioration was defined as if at least one of the following conditions exists at any point of time during the observational period: decrease (\>=100 milliliter \[mL\]) of FEV1 from Baseline (missing values are treated as no decrease); increase (\>2 units) of CAT from Baseline (missing values are treated as no increase); any documented exacerbation; and all-cause mortality. Percentage of participants experiencing a clinically important deterioration during 24 months observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time to First Moderate or Severe ExacerbationUp to 24 monthsThe time to first moderate or severe exacerbation was defined as the duration between onset of first moderate or severe acute exacerbation of COPD from Day 1. Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. It was evaluated by Kaplan-Maier analysis.
Time to First HospitalizationUp to 24 monthsTime to first hospitalization is calculated as the time interval between date of study enrollment (Day 1) and the date of the first hospital admission for a relevant cause. Time to first hospitalization was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time to DeathUp to 24 monthsTime to death is calculated as the duration between date of study enrollment (Day 1) and the date of death of a participant. Time to death was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Number of COPD Related VisitsUp to 24 monthsNumber of COPD related visits made by participants have been presented and categorized by type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists).
Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by PhysicianUp to 24 monthsThe annual rate of exacerbations during the observation period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of exacerbation/total person years. Data for mean annual rate of exacerbations categorized by general practitioners and pneumologists have been presented.
Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalization Due to Severe Exacerbation Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by PhysicianUp to 24 monthsAnnualized rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual hospitalization rate=number of hospitalizations due to severe exacerbations/total person years. Severe exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Data for mean annual rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbation categorized by general practitioners and pneumologists have been presented.
Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of PhysicianUp to 24 monthsPercentage of participants have been categorized according to the site localization (East, North, South, and West Germany) of physician and type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryUp to 24 monthsThe annual rate of exacerbations during the observation period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of exacerbation/total person years. Data for mean annual rate of exacerbations is presented by smoking status (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker), peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). Data was also categorized by the type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists).
Number of Participants Who Had Pneumonia and Cardiovascular EventsUp to 24 monthsNumber of participants who had pneumonia and cardiovascular events have been presented.
Percentage of Participants With Diagnosis of Asthma at the Age of <40 YearsBaseline (Day 1)Percentage of participants with diagnosis of asthma at the age of \<40 years have been presented. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDays 90 and 365NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants on MITT compared to non MITT. A participant is classified as MITT, if the treatment is MITT continuously for the first 365 days of observation.
Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple TherapiesDays 90 and 365NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants whose triple therapies were interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA off/on periods compared to other triple therapies.
Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no SwitchDays 90 and 365NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants whose triple therapies were switched between SITT and MITT compared to no switch. A participants is classified as switch, if there is no de-escalation of therapy, but at least one switch between SITT and MITT within the first 365 days of observation.
Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDays 90 and 365NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants on SIIT compared to non SITT. A participant is classified as SITT, if the treatment is SITT continuously for the first 365 days of observation.
Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at BaselineBaseline (Day 1)Percentage of participants with peripheral blood EOS count less than (\<) 100 cells per (/) micro liter (uL), 100 to \<200 cells/uL, 200 to greater than (\>) 300 cells/uL and greater than equal to (\>=) 300 cells/uL have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site LocalizationBaseline (Day 1)Percentage of participants with a physician's diagnosis of COPD have been categorized according to the site localization i.e. East, North, South, and West Germany. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Physicians GroupBaseline (Day 1)Percentage of participants with a physician's diagnosis of COPD categorized by pneumologists and general practitioners have been presented. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was a non-interventional study, it did not include treatment interventions. Data was collected at participant's routine visits.

Pre-assignment details

Total of 1212 participants were enrolled in this study,however 1196 participants were included in full analysis set(FAS)(as 16 participants were enrolled with incomplete documentation).FAS included all participants who signed Informed Consent Form\[ICF\],met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, and completed visit1. As pre-specified in protocol and SAP, a combined analysis across all cohorts was performed. Cohorts were used for representative sampling, not separate analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Participants with COPD, who have already been treated with triple therapy (single inhaler triple therapy \[SITT\] or multiple inhaler triple therapy \[MITT\]) for at least 2 but not longer than 48 weeks were enrolled in this study. No study treatment was administered during conduct of this study.
1,196
Total1,196

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath47
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up113
Overall StudyOther29
Overall StudyTransfer to another institution21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicParticipants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Age, Continuous66.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
1196 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
634 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
562 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
51 / 1,196
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 1,196
serious
Total, serious adverse events
142 / 1,196

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 12 Months

Percentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 12 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: From Day 1 (Month 1) up to 12 months

Population: Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 12 Months84.4 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 24 Months

Percentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 24 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: From Day 1 (Month 1) up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 24 Months38.5 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 6 Months

Percentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 6 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: From Day 1 (Month 1) up to 6 months

Population: Full Analysis Set included all participants who signed the ICF, met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, and completed visit 1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 6 Months92.5 Percentage of participants
Primary

Time to Stop Triple Therapy

Time to stop triple therapy refers to the time duration from visit 1 at which a triple therapy (SITT or MITT) was safely and appropriately discontinued because its intended goals had been achieved, or no longer attainable, or risks outweighed the benefits. It was evaluated by Kaplan-Maier analysis.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Time to Stop Triple Therapy719 Days
Secondary

Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) at Months 12 and 24

EQ-5D-5L is self-assessment questionnaire,consisting of 5 items covering 5 dimensions (mobility,self care,usual activities,pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension is measured by 5-point Likert scale (1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Each of these 5 figure health states were converted to a single index score by applying country-specific value set formula that attaches weights to dimensions and levels. Range for EQ-5D-5L index score is -0.594 (worst health) to 1 (full health state). Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) at Months 12 and 24Month 12-0.006 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.222
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) at Months 12 and 24Month 240.003 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.219
Secondary

Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 12 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Overall0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.48
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL-0.07 LiterStandard Deviation 0.52
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL-0.16 LiterStandard Deviation 0.36
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Peripheral blood EOS: Missing0.03 LiterStandard Deviation 0.48
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker-0.01 LiterStandard Deviation 0.47
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Smoking history: Current smoker0.04 LiterStandard Deviation 0.55
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Smoking history: Previous smoker0.01 LiterStandard Deviation 0.44
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Asthma history: No-0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.42
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Asthma history: Yes0.23 LiterStandard Deviation 0.81
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Asthma history: Unknown0.78 LiterStandard Deviation 0.87
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Asthma history: Missing0.08 LiterStandard Deviation 0.48
Secondary

Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 24 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Overall0.00 LiterStandard Deviation 0.52
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL0.04 LiterStandard Deviation 0.56
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL-0.13 LiterStandard Deviation 0.59
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Peripheral blood EOS: Missing0.00 LiterStandard Deviation 0.51
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker-0.04 LiterStandard Deviation 0.52
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Smoking history: Current smoker0.03 LiterStandard Deviation 0.59
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Smoking history: Previous smoker-0.01 LiterStandard Deviation 0.46
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Asthma history: No-0.04 LiterStandard Deviation 0.47
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Asthma history: Yes0.15 LiterStandard Deviation 0.82
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Asthma history: Unknown0.85 LiterStandard Deviation 0.74
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Asthma history: Missing0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.49
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 6 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Overall0.01 LiterStandard Deviation 0.38
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL-0.04 LiterStandard Deviation 0.46
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL0.00 LiterStandard Deviation 0.28
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Peripheral blood EOS: Missing0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.37
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker-0.04 LiterStandard Deviation 0.39
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Smoking history: Current smoker0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.39
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Smoking history: Previous smoker0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.36
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Asthma history: No0.00 LiterStandard Deviation 0.37
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Asthma history: Yes0.08 LiterStandard Deviation 0.28
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Asthma history: Unknown0.37 LiterStandard Deviation 0.53
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Asthma history: Missing0.05 LiterStandard Deviation 0.38
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6

FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 6 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Overall0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.46
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL-0.03 LiterStandard Deviation 0.58
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL-0.06 LiterStandard Deviation 0.29
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Peripheral blood EOS: Missing0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.45
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.39
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Smoking history: Current smoker0.01 LiterStandard Deviation 0.46
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Smoking history: Previous smoker0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.46
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Asthma history: No0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.44
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Asthma history: Yes0.00 LiterStandard Deviation 0.45
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Asthma history: Unknown0.17 LiterStandard Deviation 0.35
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6Asthma history: Missing0.01 LiterStandard Deviation 0.53
Secondary

Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12

FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 12 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 12

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Overall-0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.53
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL-0.05 LiterStandard Deviation 0.7
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL-0.24 LiterStandard Deviation 0.46
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Peripheral blood EOS: Missing-0.01 LiterStandard Deviation 0.52
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker0.22 LiterStandard Deviation 0.41
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Smoking history: Current smoker-0.05 LiterStandard Deviation 0.49
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Smoking history: Previous smoker-0.03 LiterStandard Deviation 0.55
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Asthma history: No-0.03 LiterStandard Deviation 0.52
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Asthma history: Yes-0.12 LiterStandard Deviation 0.62
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Asthma history: Unknown0.07 LiterStandard Deviation 0.58
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12Asthma history: Missing0.00 LiterStandard Deviation 0.57
Secondary

Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24

FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 24 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Overall-0.06 LiterStandard Deviation 0.56
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL0.02 LiterStandard Deviation 0.72
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL-0.13 LiterStandard Deviation 0.63
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Peripheral blood EOS: Missing-0.06 LiterStandard Deviation 0.54
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker0.08 LiterStandard Deviation 0.55
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Smoking history: Current smoker-0.06 LiterStandard Deviation 0.59
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Smoking history: Previous smoker-0.08 LiterStandard Deviation 0.53
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Asthma history: No-0.06 LiterStandard Deviation 0.56
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Asthma history: Yes0.07 LiterStandard Deviation 0.79
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Asthma history: Unknown0.26 LiterStandard Deviation 0.52
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24Asthma history: Missing-0.11 LiterStandard Deviation 0.47
Secondary

Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Physician

The annual rate of exacerbations during the observation period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of exacerbation/total person years. Data for mean annual rate of exacerbations categorized by general practitioners and pneumologists have been presented.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by PhysicianGeneral practitioners0.182 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.479
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by PhysicianPneumologists0.140 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.456
Secondary

Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History

The annual rate of exacerbations during the observation period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of exacerbation/total person years. Data for mean annual rate of exacerbations is presented by smoking status (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker), peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). Data was also categorized by the type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists).

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryGeneral practitioners: Smoking status- Lifelong non-smoker0.158 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.559
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryGeneral practitioners: Smoking status- Current smoker0.143 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.336
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryGeneral practitioners: Smoking status- Previous smoker0.211 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.535
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryGeneral practitioners: Eosinophil count- Missing0.187 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.493
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryGeneral practitioners: Eosinophil count- <300 cells/uL0.072 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.189
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryGeneral practitioners: Eosinophil count- >=300 cells/uL0.119 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.216
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryGeneral practitioners: Asthma history- Missing0.252 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.637
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryGeneral practitioners: Asthma history- No0.159 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.433
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryGeneral practitioners: Asthma history- Yes0.439 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.732
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryGeneral practitioners: Asthma history- Unknown0.386 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.711
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryPneumologists: Smoking status- Lifelong non-smoker0.099 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.331
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryPneumologists: Smoking status- Current smoker0.080 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.27
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryPneumologists: Smoking status- Previous smoker0.191 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.565
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryPneumologists: Eosinophil count- Missing0.118 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.387
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryPneumologists: Eosinophil count- <300 cells/uL0.619 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 1.077
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryPneumologists: Eosinophil count- >=300 cells/uL0.302 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.812
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryPneumologists: Asthma history- Missing0.137 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.454
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryPneumologists: Asthma history- No0.146 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.456
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryPneumologists: Asthma history- Yes0.048 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.156
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryPneumologists: Asthma history- Unknown0.116 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.532
Secondary

Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalization Due to Severe Exacerbation Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Physician

Annualized rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual hospitalization rate=number of hospitalizations due to severe exacerbations/total person years. Severe exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Data for mean annual rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbation categorized by general practitioners and pneumologists have been presented.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalization Due to Severe Exacerbation Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by PhysicianGeneral practitioners0.027 Hospitalization per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.142
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalization Due to Severe Exacerbation Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by PhysicianPneumologists0.078 Hospitalization per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.369
Secondary

Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalizations Due to Severe Exacerbations

Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Annualized rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual hospitalization rate equal to (=) number of hospitalizations due to severe exacerbations divided by (/) total person years.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalizations Due to Severe Exacerbations0.058 Hospitalization per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.303
Secondary

Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History

The annual rate of moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations during the study period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of moderate and severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of moderate or severe exacerbation/total person years. Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Data for mean annual rate of moderate and/or severe exacerbations is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral EOS count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking status (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryOverall0.156 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.465
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistorySmoking status: Lifelong non-smoker0.128 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.458
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistorySmoking status: Current smoker0.102 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.296
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistorySmoking status: Previous smoker0.199 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.553
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryEosinophil count: <300 cells/uL0.445 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.923
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryEosinophil count: >=300 cells/uL0.238 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.671
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryEosinophil count: Missing0.145 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.433
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryAsthma history: No0.152 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.446
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryAsthma history: Yes0.162 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.439
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryAsthma history: Missing0.176 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.523
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma HistoryAsthma history: Unknown0.161 Exacerbations per participant per yearStandard Deviation 0.568
Secondary

Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events

NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants on MITT compared to non MITT. A participant is classified as MITT, if the treatment is MITT continuously for the first 365 days of observation.

Time frame: Days 90 and 365

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 90: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations131 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 365: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations25 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 90: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia146 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 365: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia91 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 90: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events203 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 365: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events98 Participants
Secondary

Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events

NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants on SIIT compared to non SITT. A participant is classified as SITT, if the treatment is SITT continuously for the first 365 days of observation.

Time frame: Days 90 and 365

Population: Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 90: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations58 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 365: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations15 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 90: NNTB with respect to PneumoniaNA Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 365: NNTB with respect to PneumoniaNA Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 90: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events1042 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular EventsDay 365: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular eventsNA Participants
Secondary

Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple Therapies

NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants whose triple therapies were interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA off/on periods compared to other triple therapies.

Time frame: Days 90 and 365

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple TherapiesDay 90: NNTB with respect to ExacerbationsNA Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple TherapiesDay 365: NNTB with respect to ExacerbationsNA Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple TherapiesDay 90: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia163 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple TherapiesDay 365: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia41 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple TherapiesDay 90: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events226 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple TherapiesDay 365: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events61 Participants
Secondary

Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no Switch

NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants whose triple therapies were switched between SITT and MITT compared to no switch. A participants is classified as switch, if there is no de-escalation of therapy, but at least one switch between SITT and MITT within the first 365 days of observation.

Time frame: Days 90 and 365

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no SwitchDay 90: NNTB with respect to ExacerbationsNA Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no SwitchDay 365: NNTB with respect to ExacerbationsNA Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no SwitchDay 90: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia159 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no SwitchDay 365: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia40 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no SwitchDay 90: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular eventsNA Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no SwitchDay 365: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular eventsNA Participants
Secondary

Number of COPD Related Visits

Number of COPD related visits made by participants have been presented and categorized by type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists).

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number of COPD Related VisitsPneumologists3.7 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.89
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number of COPD Related VisitsGeneral practitioners5.8 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.89
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Had Pneumonia and Cardiovascular Events

Number of participants who had pneumonia and cardiovascular events have been presented.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Safety Analysis Set included all participants who signed the ICF, met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, and completed visit 1. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number of Participants Who Had Pneumonia and Cardiovascular EventsCardiovascular events23 Participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Number of Participants Who Had Pneumonia and Cardiovascular EventsPneumonia events22 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Their Duration of Triple Therapy Before Study Start

Data for percentage of participants by their duration of triple therapy before study start have been presented. Data was categorized into following categories according to duration of triple therapy they received prior to study start: \<3 months, 3 to \<6 months, \>=6 months. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 48 weeks before study start (Day 1 of Month 1)

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Duration of Triple Therapy Before Study Start<3 months31.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Duration of Triple Therapy Before Study Start3 to <6 months27.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Duration of Triple Therapy Before Study Start>=6 months40.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24

Percentage of participants were categorized by their smoking status as Lifelong non-smoker, Current smoker and Previous smoker. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: At Months 6, 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 6: Lifelong non-smoker8.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 6: Current smoker37.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 6: Previous smoker54.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 12: Lifelong non-smoker8.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 12: Current smoker36.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 12: Previous smoker54.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 24: Lifelong non-smoker8.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 24: Current smoker36.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 24: Previous smoker54.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician

Percentage of participants have been categorized according to the site localization (East, North, South, and West Germany) of physician and type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of PhysicianGeneral practitioners: South Germany29.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of PhysicianGeneral practitioners: East Germany9.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of PhysicianGeneral practitioners: North Germany29.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of PhysicianGeneral practitioners: West Germany32.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of PhysicianPneumologists: East Germany33.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of PhysicianPneumologists: North Germany7.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of PhysicianPneumologists: South Germany7.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of PhysicianPneumologists: West Germany51.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Important Deterioration

Clinically important deterioration was defined as if at least one of the following conditions exists at any point of time during the observational period: decrease (\>=100 milliliter \[mL\]) of FEV1 from Baseline (missing values are treated as no decrease); increase (\>2 units) of CAT from Baseline (missing values are treated as no increase); any documented exacerbation; and all-cause mortality. Percentage of participants experiencing a clinically important deterioration during 24 months observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Important Deterioration53.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24

Percentage of participants with non-missing concomitant respiratory medication received during the study are presented. Percentage of participants were categorized by the substance class of concomitant respiratory medication received by them which included oral glucocorticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonist, oral betamimetics, immunotherapy, antibiotics for respiratory indications, and other substances with cardiac or respiratory effects. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: At Months 6, 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Participants may have provided multiple answers for this question, hence may have contributed to more than one category. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 6: Oral glucocorticosteroids2.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 6: Leukotriene receptor antagonist1.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 6: Oral betamimetics23.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 6: Immunotherapy0.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 6: Antibiotics for respiratory indications1.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 6: Other substances with cardiac or respiratory effects71.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 12: Oral glucocorticosteroids3.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 12: Leukotriene receptor antagonist1.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 12: Oral betamimetics24.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 12: Immunotherapy0.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 12: Antibiotics for respiratory indications1.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 12: Other substances with cardiac or respiratory effects69.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 24: Oral glucocorticosteroids2.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 24: Leukotriene receptor antagonist1.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 24: Oral betamimetics25.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 24: Immunotherapy0.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 24: Antibiotics for respiratory indications1.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24Month 24: Other substances with cardiac or respiratory effects68.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Change Between Different Inhaler Types

Percentage of participants with a change between different inhaler types have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a Change Between Different Inhaler Types7.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation

The CAT is a validated measure of health status in COPD. The CAT is an 8-item, patient-completed instrument that covers symptoms such as cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, and disease impacts including physical activity, confidence, sleep and energy. Participants rate their experience on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment), higher score indicates greater impairment. A CAT sum score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the eight items with a scoring range of 0 (no disease impact) to 40 (maximum disease impact). Higher scores indicated greater disease impact. CAT sum score interpreted as \<=10: low impact level, 11-19: Medium impact level, \>=20: high impact level. Data for percentage of participants with CAT sum score of \<=10, 11-19, and \>=20 have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12, and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationBaseline (Day 1): <=1010.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationBaseline (Day 1): 11-1937.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationBaseline (Day 1): >=2051.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationMonth 6: <=1014.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationMonth 6: 11-1948.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationMonth 6: >=2036.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationMonth 12: <=1017.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationMonth 12: 11-1944.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationMonth 12: >=2037.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationMonth 24: <=1020.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationMonth 24: 11-1940.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months DocumentationMonth 24: >=2038.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Lifelong Non-smoking History at Baseline

Percentage of participants with a lifelong non-smoking history at Baseline have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: At Baseline (Day 1)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a Lifelong Non-smoking History at Baseline8.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24

Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage of participants with any moderate/severe exacerbation in the 24 months prior to Baseline or 3 months prior to each subsequent on-study visits at Months 6, 12 and 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months prior to Baseline (Day 1); Up to 3 months prior to Month 6; Up to 3 months prior to Month 12; Up to 3 months prior to Month 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24Up to 24 months prior to Baseline5.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24Up to 3 months prior to Month 65.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24Up to 3 months prior to Month 128.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24Up to 3 months prior to Month 246.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Physicians Group

Percentage of participants with a physician's diagnosis of COPD categorized by pneumologists and general practitioners have been presented. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Physicians GroupGeneral practitioners38.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Physicians GroupPneumologists61.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site Localization

Percentage of participants with a physician's diagnosis of COPD have been categorized according to the site localization i.e. East, North, South, and West Germany. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site LocalizationEast Germany23.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site LocalizationNorth Germany16.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site LocalizationSouth Germany16.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site LocalizationWest Germany44.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation Period

Percentage of participants with at least one change in their triple therapy from MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT during a 24-month observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation PeriodMITT to SITT3.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation PeriodSITT to MITT3.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation Period

Percentage of participants with at least one change within their type of triple therapy - from SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT during a 24-month observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation PeriodSITT to SITT2.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation PeriodMITT to MITT1.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA From Months 6 to 24

Percentage of participants with at least one switch from triple therapy to ICS/LABA from Months 6 to 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Months 6 to 24

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA From Months 6 to 241.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA)/Long-acting Beta Agonist (LABA) From Months 6 to 24

Percentage of participants with at least one switch from triple therapy to LAMA/LABA from Months 6 to 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Months 6 to 24

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA)/Long-acting Beta Agonist (LABA) From Months 6 to 242.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change From Once Daily to Twice Daily or Twice Daily to Once Daily Medication

Percentage of participants with change from once daily to twice daily or twice daily to once daily medication has been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change From Once Daily to Twice Daily or Twice Daily to Once Daily MedicationOnce daily to twice daily3.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change From Once Daily to Twice Daily or Twice Daily to Once Daily MedicationTwice daily to once daily3.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA)

Percentage of participants with change from triple to dual therapy and back to triple therapy (at least one re-escalation) during a 24-month observation period after study enrollment have been presented. Data has been presented in categories split by the type of dual therapy (LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA) received by participant after change from triple therapy. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA)Re-escalation: Triple to LABA/LAMA to Triple0.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA)Re-escalation: Triple to LABA/ICS to Triple0.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA)Re-escalation: Triple to LAMA/ICS to Triple0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA)No re-escalation98.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by SITT and MITT)

Percentage of participants with change from triple to dual therapy and back to triple therapy (re-escalation) during a 24-month observation period after study enrollment have been presented. Data has been presented in categories split by the type of triple therapy (SITT and MITT) initiated by participants prior to change. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by SITT and MITT)Re-escalation: MITT to dual therapy to MITT7.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by SITT and MITT)Re-escalation: SITT to dual therapy to SITT92.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline

Change in COPD symptoms were evaluated through COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and were categorized as stable symptoms, less symptoms, and more symptoms by comparing with Baseline. Percentage of participants with change in COPD symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 from Baseline have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12 and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From BaselineMonth 6: Stable symptoms77.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From BaselineMonth 6: Less symptoms15.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From BaselineMonth 6: More symptoms7.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From BaselineMonth 12: Stable symptoms81.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From BaselineMonth 12: Less symptoms10.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From BaselineMonth 12: More symptoms7.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From BaselineMonth 24: Stable symptoms82.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From BaselineMonth 24: Less symptoms11.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From BaselineMonth 24: More symptoms6.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Chronic Bronchitis Phenotype

Chronic bronchitis phenotype is one of the 'treatable traits' in COPD participants, which - when modified - might lead to improved health outcomes. Percentage of participants with chronic bronchitis phenotype have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Chronic Bronchitis Phenotype75.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at Baseline

COPD was classified using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Participants were classified based on symptom and risk of exacerbation, where GOLD 1 (mild COPD), GOLD 2 (moderate COPD), GOLD 3 (severe COPD) and GOLD 4 (very severe COPD). Data for percentage of participants with COPD symptom and risk classes (GOLD 1, GOLD 2, GOLD 3, and GOLD 4) have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at BaselineGOLD 17.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at BaselineGOLD 238.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at BaselineGOLD 328.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at BaselineGOLD 47.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at BaselineMissing19.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at Baseline

COPD was classified using the GOLD criteria. Participants are classified based on symptoms and risk of exacerbation, where GOLD A=Few symptoms low risk, GOLD B= More symptoms low risk, GOLD C= Few symptoms high risk and GOLD D= More symptoms high risk. Data for percentage of participants with COPD symptom and risk classes (GOLD A, GOLD B, GOLD C, and GOLD D) have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at BaselineGOLD A13.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at BaselineGOLD B43.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at BaselineGOLD C13.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at BaselineGOLD D12.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at BaselineMissing16.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Diagnosis of Asthma at the Age of <40 Years

Percentage of participants with diagnosis of asthma at the age of \<40 years have been presented. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Diagnosis of Asthma at the Age of <40 Years12.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 Months

FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FEV1 and FVC was measured using spirometry. FEV1/FVC ratio was calculated as FEV1/FVC ratio=FEV1/FVC\*100. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage of participants with FEV1/FVC value \<0.7 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12, and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsBaseline (Day 1)50.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 641.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 1242.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 2442.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months

Percentage of participants with peripheral blood EOS count of \<300 cells/uL and \>=300 cells/uL have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: At Months 6, 12, and 24

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 6: <300 cells/uL3.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 6: >=300 cells/uL1.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 6: Missing95.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 12: <300 cells/uL3.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 12: >=300 cells/uL1.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 12: Missing94.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 24: <300 cells/uL2.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 24: >=300 cells/uL1.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 MonthsMonth 24: Missing95.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline

Percentage of participants with peripheral blood EOS count less than (\<) 100 cells per (/) micro liter (uL), 100 to \<200 cells/uL, 200 to greater than (\>) 300 cells/uL and greater than equal to (\>=) 300 cells/uL have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline<100 cells/uL23.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline100 to <200 cells/uL26.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline200 to <300 cells/uL19.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline>=300 cells/uL30.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group

Percentage of participants with prespecified reasons to change a triple therapy (TT) (either MITT or SITT) by type of physician group have been presented. Reasons to change a triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Also, data has been presented by type of physician (general practitioners \[GP\] and pneumologists). Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. A participant may have \>1 reason, hence total percentage of participants from different categories (reasons) may not yield 100%. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Recommendation of guideline (e.g. discontinuation of ICS)0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Recommendation from a referring pulmonologist or acute care clinic0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Adverse Event3.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Symptomatic under existing triple therapy24.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Other9.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Missing24.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA2.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Deteriorating quality of life (QoL) and/or lung function despite long-term therapy2.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: One or more exacerbations5.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Acute exacerbation2.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason5.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Exacerbation prophylaxis0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Participants wish to change medication or device56.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Switching from open TT (MITT, various inhalers) to closed TT (SITT, one inhaler)2.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Change from twice daily to once daily0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Switching to a different type of inhaler0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Insufficient effectiveness of the previous medication5.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Recommendation of guideline (e.g. discontinuation of ICS)0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Recommendation from a referring pulmonologist or acute care clinic0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Adverse Event0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Symptomatic under existing triple therapy35.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Other7.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupGP: Missing17.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Deteriorating QoL and/or lung function despite long-term therapy12.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: One or more exacerbations6.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Acute exacerbation6.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Exacerbation prophylaxis3.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Participants wish to change medication or device21.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists:Switching from open TT(MITT, various inhalers) to closed TT(SITT, 1 inhaler)6.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Change from twice daily to once daily3.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Switching to a different type of inhaler9.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician GroupPneumologists: Insufficient effectiveness of the previous medication6.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation

Percentage of participants with reasons for change from triple therapy to therapy de-escalation in overall participants group have been presented. A participant was classified as de-escalation, if there was at least one change from triple therapy to a therapy with just two components within the first 365 days of observation. Reasons for change from triple therapy to therapy de-escalation were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. A participant may have \>1 reason, hence total percentage of participants from different categories (reasons) may not yield 100%. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationSymptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationSymptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationDeteriorating quality of life (QoL) and/or lung function despite long-term therapy7.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationOne or more exacerbations3.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationAcute exacerbation0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationHospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationExacerbation prophylaxis3.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationParticipants wish to change medication or device63.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationSwitching from open TT (MITT, various inhalers) to closed TT (SITT, one inhaler)0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationChange from twice daily to once daily3.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationSwitching to a different type of inhaler3.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationInsufficient effectiveness of the previous medication3.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationRecommendation of guideline (e.g. discontinuation of ICS)0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationRecommendation from a referring pulmonologist or acute care clinic3.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationAdverse Event3.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationSymptomatic under existing triple therapy3.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationOther7.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalationMissing22.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants

Percentage of participants with reasons for change in their triple therapy to another triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. Reasons for change in triple therapy to another triple therapy were documented in medical records by physician. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. A participant may have \>1 reason, hence total percentage of participants from different categories (reasons) may not yield 100%. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsSymptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA1.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsSymptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsDeteriorating quality of life (QoL) and/or lung function despite long-term therapy6.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsOne or more exacerbations5.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsAcute exacerbation4.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsHospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason2.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsExacerbation prophylaxis1.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsParticipants wish to change medication or device40.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsSwitching from open TT (MITT, various inhalers) to closed TT (SITT, one inhaler)4.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsChange from twice daily to once daily1.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsSwitching to a different type of inhaler4.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsInsufficient effectiveness of the previous medication5.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsRecommendation of guideline (e.g. discontinuation of ICS)0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsRecommendation from a referring pulmonologist or acute care clinic0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsAdverse Event1.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsSymptomatic under existing triple therapy30.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsOther8.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall ParticipantsMissing20.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy

Percentage of participants with reasons to change de-escalated therapy back to triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. A participant was classified as de-escalation, if there was at least one change from triple therapy to a therapy with just two components within the first 365 days of observation. Reasons to change de-escalated therapy back to triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapySymptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapySymptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyDeteriorating quality of life (QoL) and/or lung function despite long-term therapy10.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyOne or more exacerbations0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyAcute exacerbation10.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyHospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyExacerbation prophylaxis0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyParticipants wish to change medication or device20.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapySwitching from open TT (MITT, various inhalers) to closed TT (SITT, one inhaler)0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyChange from twice daily to once daily0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapySwitching to a different type of inhaler0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyInsufficient effectiveness of the previous medication10.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyRecommendation of guideline (e.g. discontinuation of ICS)0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyRecommendation from a referring pulmonologist or acute care clinic20.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyAdverse Event0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapySymptomatic under existing triple therapy0.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyOther10.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple TherapyMissing20.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group

Percentage of participants with reasons to start COPD triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. Reasons to start COPD triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons have been presented in separate categories. Also, data has been presented by type of physician (general practitioners \[GP\] and pneumologists) who documented these reasons. Percentage values are rounded-off.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set. A participant may have \>1 reason to start triple therapy, hence total percentage of participants from different categories (reasons) may not yield 100%. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupOverall: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA23.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupOverall: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA52.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupOverall: Deteriorating quality of life and/or lung function despite long-term therapy32.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupOverall: one or more exacerbations15.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupOverall: Acute exacerbation6.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupOverall: Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason3.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupOverall: Exacerbation prophylaxis21.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupOverall: Participants wish to change medication or device20.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupOverall: Other2.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupOverall: Missing0.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupGeneral practitioners: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA24.7 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupGeneral practitioners: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA51.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupGeneral practitioners: Deteriorating quality of life and/or lung function despite long-term therapy26.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupGeneral practitioners: one or more exacerbations11.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupGeneral practitioners: Acute exacerbation5.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupGeneral practitioners: Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason2.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupGeneral practitioners: Exacerbation prophylaxis31.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupGeneral practitioners: Participants wish to change medication or device38.1 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupGeneral practitioners: Other1.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupGeneral practitioners: Missing0.2 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupPneumologists: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA22.6 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupPneumologists: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA52.9 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupPneumologists: Deteriorating quality of life and/or lung function despite long-term therapy36.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupPneumologists: one or more exacerbations17.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupPneumologists: Acute exacerbation7.3 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupPneumologists: Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason3.4 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupPneumologists: Exacerbation prophylaxis15.0 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupPneumologists: Participants wish to change medication or device8.8 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupPneumologists: Other2.5 Percentage of participants
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician GroupPneumologists: Missing0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Death

Time to death is calculated as the duration between date of study enrollment (Day 1) and the date of death of a participant. Time to death was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Time to DeathNA Days
Secondary

Time to First Hospitalization

Time to first hospitalization is calculated as the time interval between date of study enrollment (Day 1) and the date of the first hospital admission for a relevant cause. Time to first hospitalization was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Time to First HospitalizationNA Days
Secondary

Time to First Moderate or Severe Exacerbation

The time to first moderate or severe exacerbation was defined as the duration between onset of first moderate or severe acute exacerbation of COPD from Day 1. Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. It was evaluated by Kaplan-Maier analysis.

Time frame: Up to 24 months

Population: Full Analysis Set.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Time to First Moderate or Severe ExacerbationNA Days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026