Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Conditions
Keywords
COPD, LABA, LAMA, ICS, TETRIS
Brief summary
TETRIS is a multi-center, prospective observational cohort study. It will include participants with COPD who are on an existing combined treatment of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long-acting beta 2 agonists (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).
Detailed description
COPD is a disabling respiratory disease characterized by airflow obstruction and associated symptoms, including breathing difficulties caused by shortness of breath and wheezing, airway hyperactivity, chronic cough, sputum production, exercise intolerance, and poor quality of life. In accordance with the GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) recommendations, it is important to assess the characteristics and treatment patterns of participants prior to triple therapy initiation, in order to determine adherence to these guidelines and understand how participants progress to triple therapy. Despite a clearly defined guidance from GOLD treatment recommendations for the initiation and maintenance of triple therapy, treatment changes in Germany, including de-escalation, are often seen in treatment reality. This study is intended to gain a better understanding of what influences the treatment decision of German physicians in primary and secondary care under real life conditions, to elicit the reasons for treatment changes and to describe long-term outcomes with participants initiated on triple therapy over a period of two years. This study will also describe the temporal dynamics of treatment pattern and to unravel potentially complex participant's journeys in different German regions and also to identify and follow-up a variety of 'treatable traits' in COPD participants, which when modified may lead to improved health outcomes.
Interventions
prospective observational cohort study
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participant is at least 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent. * Participant is on a SITT or MITT for treatment of an obstructive respiratory disease for a period of 6 to 18 weeks prior enrolment with a combination of inhaled LAMA, LABA and ICS either on a triple maintenance treatment or an intermediate triple therapy regime (ICS on/off or LAMA on/off). * Inclusion criteria for Group A- (treatment by settled general practitioners): Participants are treated according to a physicians diagnosis of COPD. * Inclusion criteria for Group B and C- (treatment by settled pulmonologists or treatment by outpatient lung centers): Participants have a confirmed physician's diagnosis (diagnosis based on spirometry or body plethysmography) of COPD. * Participants need to give and be capable of giving signed informed consent form (ICF).
Exclusion criteria
* Participant has a diagnosis of pure asthma, without clinical features of COPD. * Participant has a current diagnosis of lung cancer or lung metastasis. * Participant has a current primary diagnosis of diffuse pan-bronchiolitis, or a primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis or pulmonary fibrosis or cystic fibrosis or other significant respiratory disorders. * Participant is currently enrolled or has participated in a study within the last 90 days before signing of consent involving investigational study treatment intervention. If, while enrolled in the present study, the participant enrolls in another study involving investigational study treatment intervention, he/she will be withdrawn from the present study. * Recent (\<= months) major cardiac or pulmonary event (for example myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 6 Months | From Day 1 (Month 1) up to 6 months | Percentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 6 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 12 Months | From Day 1 (Month 1) up to 12 months | Percentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 12 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 24 Months | From Day 1 (Month 1) up to 24 months | Percentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 24 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Time to Stop Triple Therapy | Up to 24 months | Time to stop triple therapy refers to the time duration from visit 1 at which a triple therapy (SITT or MITT) was safely and appropriately discontinued because its intended goals had been achieved, or no longer attainable, or risks outweighed the benefits. It was evaluated by Kaplan-Maier analysis. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at Baseline | Baseline (Day 1) | COPD was classified using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Participants were classified based on symptom and risk of exacerbation, where GOLD 1 (mild COPD), GOLD 2 (moderate COPD), GOLD 3 (severe COPD) and GOLD 4 (very severe COPD). Data for percentage of participants with COPD symptom and risk classes (GOLD 1, GOLD 2, GOLD 3, and GOLD 4) have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at Baseline | Baseline (Day 1) | COPD was classified using the GOLD criteria. Participants are classified based on symptoms and risk of exacerbation, where GOLD A=Few symptoms low risk, GOLD B= More symptoms low risk, GOLD C= Few symptoms high risk and GOLD D= More symptoms high risk. Data for percentage of participants with COPD symptom and risk classes (GOLD A, GOLD B, GOLD C, and GOLD D) have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | At Months 6, 12 and 24 | Percentage of participants with non-missing concomitant respiratory medication received during the study are presented. Percentage of participants were categorized by the substance class of concomitant respiratory medication received by them which included oral glucocorticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonist, oral betamimetics, immunotherapy, antibiotics for respiratory indications, and other substances with cardiac or respiratory effects. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants by Their Duration of Triple Therapy Before Study Start | Up to 48 weeks before study start (Day 1 of Month 1) | Data for percentage of participants by their duration of triple therapy before study start have been presented. Data was categorized into following categories according to duration of triple therapy they received prior to study start: \<3 months, 3 to \<6 months, \>=6 months. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24 | At Months 6, 12 and 24 | Percentage of participants were categorized by their smoking status as Lifelong non-smoker, Current smoker and Previous smoker. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Lifelong Non-smoking History at Baseline | At Baseline (Day 1) | Percentage of participants with a lifelong non-smoking history at Baseline have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Baseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12, and 24 | FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FEV1 and FVC was measured using spirometry. FEV1/FVC ratio was calculated as FEV1/FVC ratio=FEV1/FVC\*100. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage of participants with FEV1/FVC value \<0.7 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA) | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with change from triple to dual therapy and back to triple therapy (at least one re-escalation) during a 24-month observation period after study enrollment have been presented. Data has been presented in categories split by the type of dual therapy (LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA) received by participant after change from triple therapy. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Up to 24 months prior to Baseline (Day 1); Up to 3 months prior to Month 6; Up to 3 months prior to Month 12; Up to 3 months prior to Month 24 | Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage of participants with any moderate/severe exacerbation in the 24 months prior to Baseline or 3 months prior to each subsequent on-study visits at Months 6, 12 and 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Baseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12, and 24 | The CAT is a validated measure of health status in COPD. The CAT is an 8-item, patient-completed instrument that covers symptoms such as cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, and disease impacts including physical activity, confidence, sleep and energy. Participants rate their experience on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment), higher score indicates greater impairment. A CAT sum score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the eight items with a scoring range of 0 (no disease impact) to 40 (maximum disease impact). Higher scores indicated greater disease impact. CAT sum score interpreted as \<=10: low impact level, 11-19: Medium impact level, \>=20: high impact level. Data for percentage of participants with CAT sum score of \<=10, 11-19, and \>=20 have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months | At Months 6, 12, and 24 | Percentage of participants with peripheral blood EOS count of \<300 cells/uL and \>=300 cells/uL have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Chronic Bronchitis Phenotype | Up to 24 months | Chronic bronchitis phenotype is one of the 'treatable traits' in COPD participants, which - when modified - might lead to improved health outcomes. Percentage of participants with chronic bronchitis phenotype have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA)/Long-acting Beta Agonist (LABA) From Months 6 to 24 | Months 6 to 24 | Percentage of participants with at least one switch from triple therapy to LAMA/LABA from Months 6 to 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA From Months 6 to 24 | Months 6 to 24 | Percentage of participants with at least one switch from triple therapy to ICS/LABA from Months 6 to 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with reasons to start COPD triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. Reasons to start COPD triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons have been presented in separate categories. Also, data has been presented by type of physician (general practitioners \[GP\] and pneumologists) who documented these reasons. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by SITT and MITT) | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with change from triple to dual therapy and back to triple therapy (re-escalation) during a 24-month observation period after study enrollment have been presented. Data has been presented in categories split by the type of triple therapy (SITT and MITT) initiated by participants prior to change. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation Period | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with at least one change in their triple therapy from MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT during a 24-month observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation Period | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with at least one change within their type of triple therapy - from SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT during a 24-month observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Change From Once Daily to Twice Daily or Twice Daily to Once Daily Medication | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with change from once daily to twice daily or twice daily to once daily medication has been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Change Between Different Inhaler Types | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with a change between different inhaler types have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with prespecified reasons to change a triple therapy (TT) (either MITT or SITT) by type of physician group have been presented. Reasons to change a triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Also, data has been presented by type of physician (general practitioners \[GP\] and pneumologists). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with reasons for change in their triple therapy to another triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. Reasons for change in triple therapy to another triple therapy were documented in medical records by physician. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with reasons for change from triple therapy to therapy de-escalation in overall participants group have been presented. A participant was classified as de-escalation, if there was at least one change from triple therapy to a therapy with just two components within the first 365 days of observation. Reasons for change from triple therapy to therapy de-escalation were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants with reasons to change de-escalated therapy back to triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. A participant was classified as de-escalation, if there was at least one change from triple therapy to a therapy with just two components within the first 365 days of observation. Reasons to change de-escalated therapy back to triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Up to 24 months | The annual rate of moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations during the study period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of moderate and severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of moderate or severe exacerbation/total person years. Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Data for mean annual rate of moderate and/or severe exacerbations is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral EOS count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking status (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). |
| Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalizations Due to Severe Exacerbations | Up to 24 months | Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Annualized rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual hospitalization rate equal to (=) number of hospitalizations due to severe exacerbations divided by (/) total person years. |
| Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6 | FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 6 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). |
| Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 12 | FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 12 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). |
| Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 24 | FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 24 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). |
| Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6 | FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 6 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). |
| Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 12 | FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 12 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). |
| Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 24 | FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 24 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). |
| Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline | Baseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12 and 24 | Change in COPD symptoms were evaluated through COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and were categorized as stable symptoms, less symptoms, and more symptoms by comparing with Baseline. Percentage of participants with change in COPD symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 from Baseline have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) at Months 12 and 24 | Baseline (Day 1), Months 12 and 24 | EQ-5D-5L is self-assessment questionnaire,consisting of 5 items covering 5 dimensions (mobility,self care,usual activities,pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension is measured by 5-point Likert scale (1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Each of these 5 figure health states were converted to a single index score by applying country-specific value set formula that attaches weights to dimensions and levels. Range for EQ-5D-5L index score is -0.594 (worst health) to 1 (full health state). Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Important Deterioration | Up to 24 months | Clinically important deterioration was defined as if at least one of the following conditions exists at any point of time during the observational period: decrease (\>=100 milliliter \[mL\]) of FEV1 from Baseline (missing values are treated as no decrease); increase (\>2 units) of CAT from Baseline (missing values are treated as no increase); any documented exacerbation; and all-cause mortality. Percentage of participants experiencing a clinically important deterioration during 24 months observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Time to First Moderate or Severe Exacerbation | Up to 24 months | The time to first moderate or severe exacerbation was defined as the duration between onset of first moderate or severe acute exacerbation of COPD from Day 1. Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. It was evaluated by Kaplan-Maier analysis. |
| Time to First Hospitalization | Up to 24 months | Time to first hospitalization is calculated as the time interval between date of study enrollment (Day 1) and the date of the first hospital admission for a relevant cause. Time to first hospitalization was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. |
| Time to Death | Up to 24 months | Time to death is calculated as the duration between date of study enrollment (Day 1) and the date of death of a participant. Time to death was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. |
| Number of COPD Related Visits | Up to 24 months | Number of COPD related visits made by participants have been presented and categorized by type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists). |
| Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Physician | Up to 24 months | The annual rate of exacerbations during the observation period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of exacerbation/total person years. Data for mean annual rate of exacerbations categorized by general practitioners and pneumologists have been presented. |
| Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalization Due to Severe Exacerbation Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Physician | Up to 24 months | Annualized rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual hospitalization rate=number of hospitalizations due to severe exacerbations/total person years. Severe exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Data for mean annual rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbation categorized by general practitioners and pneumologists have been presented. |
| Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician | Up to 24 months | Percentage of participants have been categorized according to the site localization (East, North, South, and West Germany) of physician and type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Up to 24 months | The annual rate of exacerbations during the observation period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of exacerbation/total person years. Data for mean annual rate of exacerbations is presented by smoking status (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker), peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). Data was also categorized by the type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists). |
| Number of Participants Who Had Pneumonia and Cardiovascular Events | Up to 24 months | Number of participants who had pneumonia and cardiovascular events have been presented. |
| Percentage of Participants With Diagnosis of Asthma at the Age of <40 Years | Baseline (Day 1) | Percentage of participants with diagnosis of asthma at the age of \<40 years have been presented. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Days 90 and 365 | NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants on MITT compared to non MITT. A participant is classified as MITT, if the treatment is MITT continuously for the first 365 days of observation. |
| Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple Therapies | Days 90 and 365 | NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants whose triple therapies were interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA off/on periods compared to other triple therapies. |
| Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no Switch | Days 90 and 365 | NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants whose triple therapies were switched between SITT and MITT compared to no switch. A participants is classified as switch, if there is no de-escalation of therapy, but at least one switch between SITT and MITT within the first 365 days of observation. |
| Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Days 90 and 365 | NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants on SIIT compared to non SITT. A participant is classified as SITT, if the treatment is SITT continuously for the first 365 days of observation. |
| Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline | Baseline (Day 1) | Percentage of participants with peripheral blood EOS count less than (\<) 100 cells per (/) micro liter (uL), 100 to \<200 cells/uL, 200 to greater than (\>) 300 cells/uL and greater than equal to (\>=) 300 cells/uL have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site Localization | Baseline (Day 1) | Percentage of participants with a physician's diagnosis of COPD have been categorized according to the site localization i.e. East, North, South, and West Germany. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Physicians Group | Baseline (Day 1) | Percentage of participants with a physician's diagnosis of COPD categorized by pneumologists and general practitioners have been presented. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off. |
Countries
Germany
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This was a non-interventional study, it did not include treatment interventions. Data was collected at participant's routine visits.
Pre-assignment details
Total of 1212 participants were enrolled in this study,however 1196 participants were included in full analysis set(FAS)(as 16 participants were enrolled with incomplete documentation).FAS included all participants who signed Informed Consent Form\[ICF\],met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, and completed visit1. As pre-specified in protocol and SAP, a combined analysis across all cohorts was performed. Cohorts were used for representative sampling, not separate analyses.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Participants with COPD, who have already been treated with triple therapy (single inhaler triple therapy \[SITT\] or multiple inhaler triple therapy \[MITT\]) for at least 2 but not longer than 48 weeks were enrolled in this study. No study treatment was administered during conduct of this study. | 1,196 |
| Total | 1,196 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 47 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 113 |
| Overall Study | Other | 29 |
| Overall Study | Transfer to another institution | 21 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 21 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 66.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 1196 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 634 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 562 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 51 / 1,196 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 16 / 1,196 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 142 / 1,196 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 12 Months
Percentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 12 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: From Day 1 (Month 1) up to 12 months
Population: Full Analysis Set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 12 Months | 84.4 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 24 Months
Percentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 24 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: From Day 1 (Month 1) up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 24 Months | 38.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 6 Months
Percentage of participants who continuously received triple therapy (SITT or MITT) for 6 months from visit 1 (Day 1 of Month 1) have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: From Day 1 (Month 1) up to 6 months
Population: Full Analysis Set included all participants who signed the ICF, met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, and completed visit 1.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Continuously Received Triple Therapy for 6 Months | 92.5 Percentage of participants |
Time to Stop Triple Therapy
Time to stop triple therapy refers to the time duration from visit 1 at which a triple therapy (SITT or MITT) was safely and appropriately discontinued because its intended goals had been achieved, or no longer attainable, or risks outweighed the benefits. It was evaluated by Kaplan-Maier analysis.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Time to Stop Triple Therapy | 719 Days |
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) at Months 12 and 24
EQ-5D-5L is self-assessment questionnaire,consisting of 5 items covering 5 dimensions (mobility,self care,usual activities,pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Each dimension is measured by 5-point Likert scale (1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems and 5=extreme problems). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Each of these 5 figure health states were converted to a single index score by applying country-specific value set formula that attaches weights to dimensions and levels. Range for EQ-5D-5L index score is -0.594 (worst health) to 1 (full health state). Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 12 and 24
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) at Months 12 and 24 | Month 12 | -0.006 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.222 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) at Months 12 and 24 | Month 24 | 0.003 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.219 |
Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 12 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Overall | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL | -0.07 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL | -0.16 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Peripheral blood EOS: Missing | 0.03 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker | -0.01 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Smoking history: Current smoker | 0.04 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Smoking history: Previous smoker | 0.01 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Asthma history: No | -0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Asthma history: Yes | 0.23 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Asthma history: Unknown | 0.78 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.87 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Asthma history: Missing | 0.08 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 24 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 24
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Overall | 0.00 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL | 0.04 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL | -0.13 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Peripheral blood EOS: Missing | 0.00 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.51 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker | -0.04 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Smoking history: Current smoker | 0.03 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Smoking history: Previous smoker | -0.01 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Asthma history: No | -0.04 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Asthma history: Yes | 0.15 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Asthma history: Unknown | 0.85 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.74 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FEV1 in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Asthma history: Missing | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 6 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FEV1 is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Overall | 0.01 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL | -0.04 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL | 0.00 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Peripheral blood EOS: Missing | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker | -0.04 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Smoking history: Current smoker | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Smoking history: Previous smoker | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.36 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Asthma history: No | 0.00 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.37 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Asthma history: Yes | 0.08 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Asthma history: Unknown | 0.37 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Asthma history: Missing | 0.05 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6
FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 6 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 6
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Overall | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL | -0.03 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL | -0.06 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Peripheral blood EOS: Missing | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Smoking history: Current smoker | 0.01 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Smoking history: Previous smoker | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Asthma history: No | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.44 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Asthma history: Yes | 0.00 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.45 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Asthma history: Unknown | 0.17 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.35 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 6 | Asthma history: Missing | 0.01 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12
FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 12 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 12
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Overall | -0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL | -0.05 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL | -0.24 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Peripheral blood EOS: Missing | -0.01 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker | 0.22 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Smoking history: Current smoker | -0.05 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Smoking history: Previous smoker | -0.03 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Asthma history: No | -0.03 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Asthma history: Yes | -0.12 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Asthma history: Unknown | 0.07 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 12 | Asthma history: Missing | 0.00 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24
FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FVC was measured using spirometry. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Month 24 minus the value at Baseline. Data for change from Baseline in FVC is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking history (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and at Month 24
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Overall | -0.06 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Peripheral blood EOS: <300 cells/uL | 0.02 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Peripheral blood EOS: >=300 cells/uL | -0.13 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Peripheral blood EOS: Missing | -0.06 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.54 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Smoking history: Lifelong non-smoker | 0.08 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Smoking history: Current smoker | -0.06 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Smoking history: Previous smoker | -0.08 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Asthma history: No | -0.06 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.56 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Asthma history: Yes | 0.07 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Asthma history: Unknown | 0.26 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Change From Baseline in FVC in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History at Month 24 | Asthma history: Missing | -0.11 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Physician
The annual rate of exacerbations during the observation period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of exacerbation/total person years. Data for mean annual rate of exacerbations categorized by general practitioners and pneumologists have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Physician | General practitioners | 0.182 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.479 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Physician | Pneumologists | 0.140 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.456 |
Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History
The annual rate of exacerbations during the observation period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of exacerbation/total person years. Data for mean annual rate of exacerbations is presented by smoking status (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker), peripheral blood eosinophil count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown). Data was also categorized by the type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists).
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | General practitioners: Smoking status- Lifelong non-smoker | 0.158 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.559 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | General practitioners: Smoking status- Current smoker | 0.143 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.336 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | General practitioners: Smoking status- Previous smoker | 0.211 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.535 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | General practitioners: Eosinophil count- Missing | 0.187 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.493 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | General practitioners: Eosinophil count- <300 cells/uL | 0.072 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.189 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | General practitioners: Eosinophil count- >=300 cells/uL | 0.119 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.216 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | General practitioners: Asthma history- Missing | 0.252 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.637 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | General practitioners: Asthma history- No | 0.159 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.433 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | General practitioners: Asthma history- Yes | 0.439 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.732 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | General practitioners: Asthma history- Unknown | 0.386 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.711 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Pneumologists: Smoking status- Lifelong non-smoker | 0.099 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.331 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Pneumologists: Smoking status- Current smoker | 0.080 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Pneumologists: Smoking status- Previous smoker | 0.191 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.565 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Pneumologists: Eosinophil count- Missing | 0.118 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.387 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Pneumologists: Eosinophil count- <300 cells/uL | 0.619 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 1.077 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Pneumologists: Eosinophil count- >=300 cells/uL | 0.302 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.812 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Pneumologists: Asthma history- Missing | 0.137 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.454 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Pneumologists: Asthma history- No | 0.146 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.456 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Pneumologists: Asthma history- Yes | 0.048 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.156 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Exacerbations Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Type of Physician and by Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Pneumologists: Asthma history- Unknown | 0.116 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.532 |
Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalization Due to Severe Exacerbation Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Physician
Annualized rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual hospitalization rate=number of hospitalizations due to severe exacerbations/total person years. Severe exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Data for mean annual rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbation categorized by general practitioners and pneumologists have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalization Due to Severe Exacerbation Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Physician | General practitioners | 0.027 Hospitalization per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.142 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalization Due to Severe Exacerbation Over a 24-month Observation Period Categorized by Physician | Pneumologists | 0.078 Hospitalization per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.369 |
Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalizations Due to Severe Exacerbations
Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Annualized rate of hospitalization due to severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual hospitalization rate equal to (=) number of hospitalizations due to severe exacerbations divided by (/) total person years.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Hospitalizations Due to Severe Exacerbations | 0.058 Hospitalization per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.303 |
Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History
The annual rate of moderate and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations during the study period (per participant per year) was assessed. Annualized rate of moderate and severe exacerbations was calculated as Annual exacerbation rate = total number of moderate or severe exacerbation/total person years. Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Data for mean annual rate of moderate and/or severe exacerbations is presented for overall participants, and by their peripheral EOS count (missing, \<300 and \>=300 cells/uL), smoking status (Lifelong non-smoker, Current and previous smoker) and asthma history (missing, yes, no and unknown).
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Overall | 0.156 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.465 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Smoking status: Lifelong non-smoker | 0.128 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.458 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Smoking status: Current smoker | 0.102 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.296 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Smoking status: Previous smoker | 0.199 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.553 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Eosinophil count: <300 cells/uL | 0.445 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.923 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Eosinophil count: >=300 cells/uL | 0.238 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.671 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Eosinophil count: Missing | 0.145 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.433 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Asthma history: No | 0.152 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.446 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Asthma history: Yes | 0.162 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.439 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Asthma history: Missing | 0.176 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.523 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Mean Annual Rate of Moderate and/or Severe Exacerbations in Overall Participants and by Their Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count, Smoking Status and Asthma History | Asthma history: Unknown | 0.161 Exacerbations per participant per year | Standard Deviation 0.568 |
Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events
NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants on MITT compared to non MITT. A participant is classified as MITT, if the treatment is MITT continuously for the first 365 days of observation.
Time frame: Days 90 and 365
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations | 131 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations | 25 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia | 146 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia | 91 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events | 203 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for MITT Participants Compared to Non MITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events | 98 Participants |
Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events
NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants on SIIT compared to non SITT. A participant is classified as SITT, if the treatment is SITT continuously for the first 365 days of observation.
Time frame: Days 90 and 365
Population: Full Analysis Set.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations | 58 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations | 15 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia | NA Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia | NA Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events | 1042 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) for SITT Participants Compared to Non SITT With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events | NA Participants |
Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple Therapies
NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants whose triple therapies were interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA off/on periods compared to other triple therapies.
Time frame: Days 90 and 365
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple Therapies | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations | NA Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple Therapies | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations | NA Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple Therapies | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia | 163 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple Therapies | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia | 41 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple Therapies | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events | 226 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants Whose Triple Therapies Interrupted by ICS and/or LAMA Off/on Periods Compared to Other Triple Therapies | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events | 61 Participants |
Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no Switch
NNTB is a metric used to assess the benefit of treatment. It indicates how many participants need to be treated to achieve one additional beneficial outcome with respect to exacerbations, pneumonia, and cardiovascular events. NNTB is presented as number of participants and is presented at Days 90 and 365 for participants whose triple therapies were switched between SITT and MITT compared to no switch. A participants is classified as switch, if there is no de-escalation of therapy, but at least one switch between SITT and MITT within the first 365 days of observation.
Time frame: Days 90 and 365
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no Switch | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations | NA Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no Switch | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Exacerbations | NA Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no Switch | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia | 159 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no Switch | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Pneumonia | 40 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no Switch | Day 90: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events | NA Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number Needed to Treat for Benefit (NNTB) With Respect to Exacerbations, Pneumonia, and Cardiovascular Events for Participants With Switch of Triple Therapies Between SITT and MITT Compared to no Switch | Day 365: NNTB with respect to Cardiovascular events | NA Participants |
Number of COPD Related Visits
Number of COPD related visits made by participants have been presented and categorized by type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists).
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number of COPD Related Visits | Pneumologists | 3.7 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number of COPD Related Visits | General practitioners | 5.8 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
Number of Participants Who Had Pneumonia and Cardiovascular Events
Number of participants who had pneumonia and cardiovascular events have been presented.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Safety Analysis Set included all participants who signed the ICF, met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria, and completed visit 1. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number of Participants Who Had Pneumonia and Cardiovascular Events | Cardiovascular events | 23 Participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Number of Participants Who Had Pneumonia and Cardiovascular Events | Pneumonia events | 22 Participants |
Percentage of Participants by Their Duration of Triple Therapy Before Study Start
Data for percentage of participants by their duration of triple therapy before study start have been presented. Data was categorized into following categories according to duration of triple therapy they received prior to study start: \<3 months, 3 to \<6 months, \>=6 months. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks before study start (Day 1 of Month 1)
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Duration of Triple Therapy Before Study Start | <3 months | 31.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Duration of Triple Therapy Before Study Start | 3 to <6 months | 27.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Duration of Triple Therapy Before Study Start | >=6 months | 40.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24
Percentage of participants were categorized by their smoking status as Lifelong non-smoker, Current smoker and Previous smoker. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: At Months 6, 12 and 24
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 6: Lifelong non-smoker | 8.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 6: Current smoker | 37.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 6: Previous smoker | 54.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 12: Lifelong non-smoker | 8.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 12: Current smoker | 36.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 12: Previous smoker | 54.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 24: Lifelong non-smoker | 8.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 24: Current smoker | 36.5 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants by Their Smoking Status at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 24: Previous smoker | 54.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician
Percentage of participants have been categorized according to the site localization (East, North, South, and West Germany) of physician and type of physician (general practitioners and pneumologists). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician | General practitioners: South Germany | 29.5 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician | General practitioners: East Germany | 9.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician | General practitioners: North Germany | 29.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician | General practitioners: West Germany | 32.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician | Pneumologists: East Germany | 33.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician | Pneumologists: North Germany | 7.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician | Pneumologists: South Germany | 7.5 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Categorized by the Site Localization of Physician and by Type of Physician | Pneumologists: West Germany | 51.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Important Deterioration
Clinically important deterioration was defined as if at least one of the following conditions exists at any point of time during the observational period: decrease (\>=100 milliliter \[mL\]) of FEV1 from Baseline (missing values are treated as no decrease); increase (\>2 units) of CAT from Baseline (missing values are treated as no increase); any documented exacerbation; and all-cause mortality. Percentage of participants experiencing a clinically important deterioration during 24 months observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Clinically Important Deterioration | 53.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24
Percentage of participants with non-missing concomitant respiratory medication received during the study are presented. Percentage of participants were categorized by the substance class of concomitant respiratory medication received by them which included oral glucocorticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonist, oral betamimetics, immunotherapy, antibiotics for respiratory indications, and other substances with cardiac or respiratory effects. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: At Months 6, 12 and 24
Population: Full Analysis Set. Participants may have provided multiple answers for this question, hence may have contributed to more than one category. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 6: Oral glucocorticosteroids | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 6: Leukotriene receptor antagonist | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 6: Oral betamimetics | 23.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 6: Immunotherapy | 0.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 6: Antibiotics for respiratory indications | 1.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 6: Other substances with cardiac or respiratory effects | 71.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 12: Oral glucocorticosteroids | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 12: Leukotriene receptor antagonist | 1.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 12: Oral betamimetics | 24.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 12: Immunotherapy | 0.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 12: Antibiotics for respiratory indications | 1.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 12: Other substances with cardiac or respiratory effects | 69.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 24: Oral glucocorticosteroids | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 24: Leukotriene receptor antagonist | 1.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 24: Oral betamimetics | 25.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 24: Immunotherapy | 0.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 24: Antibiotics for respiratory indications | 1.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants Who Received Concomitant Respiratory Medication at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Month 24: Other substances with cardiac or respiratory effects | 68.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Change Between Different Inhaler Types
Percentage of participants with a change between different inhaler types have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a Change Between Different Inhaler Types | 7.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation
The CAT is a validated measure of health status in COPD. The CAT is an 8-item, patient-completed instrument that covers symptoms such as cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, and disease impacts including physical activity, confidence, sleep and energy. Participants rate their experience on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment), higher score indicates greater impairment. A CAT sum score was calculated by summing the non-missing scores of the eight items with a scoring range of 0 (no disease impact) to 40 (maximum disease impact). Higher scores indicated greater disease impact. CAT sum score interpreted as \<=10: low impact level, 11-19: Medium impact level, \>=20: high impact level. Data for percentage of participants with CAT sum score of \<=10, 11-19, and \>=20 have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12, and 24
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Baseline (Day 1): <=10 | 10.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Baseline (Day 1): 11-19 | 37.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Baseline (Day 1): >=20 | 51.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Month 6: <=10 | 14.5 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Month 6: 11-19 | 48.5 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Month 6: >=20 | 36.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Month 12: <=10 | 17.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Month 12: 11-19 | 44.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Month 12: >=20 | 37.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Month 24: <=10 | 20.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Month 24: 11-19 | 40.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score <=10, 11-19, >=20 at Baseline and at 6, 12 and 24 Months Documentation | Month 24: >=20 | 38.6 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Lifelong Non-smoking History at Baseline
Percentage of participants with a lifelong non-smoking history at Baseline have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: At Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a Lifelong Non-smoking History at Baseline | 8.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24
Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage of participants with any moderate/severe exacerbation in the 24 months prior to Baseline or 3 months prior to each subsequent on-study visits at Months 6, 12 and 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months prior to Baseline (Day 1); Up to 3 months prior to Month 6; Up to 3 months prior to Month 12; Up to 3 months prior to Month 24
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Up to 24 months prior to Baseline | 5.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Up to 3 months prior to Month 6 | 5.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Up to 3 months prior to Month 12 | 8.5 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Any Moderate/Severe Exacerbation in the 24 Months Prior to Baseline or 3 Months Prior to Each Subsequent On-study Visits at Months 6, 12 and 24 | Up to 3 months prior to Month 24 | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Physicians Group
Percentage of participants with a physician's diagnosis of COPD categorized by pneumologists and general practitioners have been presented. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Physicians Group | General practitioners | 38.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Physicians Group | Pneumologists | 61.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site Localization
Percentage of participants with a physician's diagnosis of COPD have been categorized according to the site localization i.e. East, North, South, and West Germany. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site Localization | East Germany | 23.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site Localization | North Germany | 16.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site Localization | South Germany | 16.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Diagnosis of COPD by Site Localization | West Germany | 44.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation Period
Percentage of participants with at least one change in their triple therapy from MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT during a 24-month observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation Period | MITT to SITT | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From MITT to SITT or SITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation Period | SITT to MITT | 3.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation Period
Percentage of participants with at least one change within their type of triple therapy - from SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT during a 24-month observation period have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation Period | SITT to SITT | 2.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Change From SITT to SITT or MITT to MITT During a 24-month Observation Period | MITT to MITT | 1.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA From Months 6 to 24
Percentage of participants with at least one switch from triple therapy to ICS/LABA from Months 6 to 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Months 6 to 24
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Inhaled Corticosteroids (ICS)/LABA From Months 6 to 24 | 1.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA)/Long-acting Beta Agonist (LABA) From Months 6 to 24
Percentage of participants with at least one switch from triple therapy to LAMA/LABA from Months 6 to 24 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Months 6 to 24
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With at Least One Switch From Triple Therapy to Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonist (LAMA)/Long-acting Beta Agonist (LABA) From Months 6 to 24 | 2.2 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Change From Once Daily to Twice Daily or Twice Daily to Once Daily Medication
Percentage of participants with change from once daily to twice daily or twice daily to once daily medication has been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change From Once Daily to Twice Daily or Twice Daily to Once Daily Medication | Once daily to twice daily | 3.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change From Once Daily to Twice Daily or Twice Daily to Once Daily Medication | Twice daily to once daily | 3.2 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA)
Percentage of participants with change from triple to dual therapy and back to triple therapy (at least one re-escalation) during a 24-month observation period after study enrollment have been presented. Data has been presented in categories split by the type of dual therapy (LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA) received by participant after change from triple therapy. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA) | Re-escalation: Triple to LABA/LAMA to Triple | 0.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA) | Re-escalation: Triple to LABA/ICS to Triple | 0.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA) | Re-escalation: Triple to LAMA/ICS to Triple | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA and ICS/LAMA) | No re-escalation | 98.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by SITT and MITT)
Percentage of participants with change from triple to dual therapy and back to triple therapy (re-escalation) during a 24-month observation period after study enrollment have been presented. Data has been presented in categories split by the type of triple therapy (SITT and MITT) initiated by participants prior to change. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by SITT and MITT) | Re-escalation: MITT to dual therapy to MITT | 7.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change From Triple to Dual Therapy and Back to Triple Therapy (at Least One Re-escalation) During a 24-month Observation Period After Study Enrollment (Split by SITT and MITT) | Re-escalation: SITT to dual therapy to SITT | 92.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline
Change in COPD symptoms were evaluated through COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and were categorized as stable symptoms, less symptoms, and more symptoms by comparing with Baseline. Percentage of participants with change in COPD symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 from Baseline have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12 and 24
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline | Month 6: Stable symptoms | 77.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline | Month 6: Less symptoms | 15.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline | Month 6: More symptoms | 7.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline | Month 12: Stable symptoms | 81.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline | Month 12: Less symptoms | 10.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline | Month 12: More symptoms | 7.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline | Month 24: Stable symptoms | 82.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline | Month 24: Less symptoms | 11.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Change in COPD Symptoms at Months 6, 12 and 24 From Baseline | Month 24: More symptoms | 6.4 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Bronchitis Phenotype
Chronic bronchitis phenotype is one of the 'treatable traits' in COPD participants, which - when modified - might lead to improved health outcomes. Percentage of participants with chronic bronchitis phenotype have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Chronic Bronchitis Phenotype | 75.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at Baseline
COPD was classified using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. Participants were classified based on symptom and risk of exacerbation, where GOLD 1 (mild COPD), GOLD 2 (moderate COPD), GOLD 3 (severe COPD) and GOLD 4 (very severe COPD). Data for percentage of participants with COPD symptom and risk classes (GOLD 1, GOLD 2, GOLD 3, and GOLD 4) have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at Baseline | GOLD 1 | 7.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at Baseline | GOLD 2 | 38.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at Baseline | GOLD 3 | 28.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at Baseline | GOLD 4 | 7.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD 1 to 4) at Baseline | Missing | 19.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at Baseline
COPD was classified using the GOLD criteria. Participants are classified based on symptoms and risk of exacerbation, where GOLD A=Few symptoms low risk, GOLD B= More symptoms low risk, GOLD C= Few symptoms high risk and GOLD D= More symptoms high risk. Data for percentage of participants with COPD symptom and risk classes (GOLD A, GOLD B, GOLD C, and GOLD D) have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at Baseline | GOLD A | 13.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at Baseline | GOLD B | 43.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at Baseline | GOLD C | 13.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at Baseline | GOLD D | 12.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With COPD Symptom and Risk Classes (GOLD A to D) at Baseline | Missing | 16.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Diagnosis of Asthma at the Age of <40 Years
Percentage of participants with diagnosis of asthma at the age of \<40 years have been presented. Data was collected at Baseline visit on Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Diagnosis of Asthma at the Age of <40 Years | 12.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 Months
FEV1 is a measure of lung function and is defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. FVC is a measure of lung function and is defined as total amount of air that can be exhaled after taking a deep breath. FEV1 and FVC was measured using spirometry. FEV1/FVC ratio was calculated as FEV1/FVC ratio=FEV1/FVC\*100. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage of participants with FEV1/FVC value \<0.7 have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Months 6, 12, and 24
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Baseline (Day 1) | 50.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 6 | 41.5 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 12 | 42.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Ratio (FEV1/FVC) of <0.7 at Study Enrollment and at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 24 | 42.4 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months
Percentage of participants with peripheral blood EOS count of \<300 cells/uL and \>=300 cells/uL have been presented. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: At Months 6, 12, and 24
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 6: <300 cells/uL | 3.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 6: >=300 cells/uL | 1.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 6: Missing | 95.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 12: <300 cells/uL | 3.5 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 12: >=300 cells/uL | 1.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 12: Missing | 94.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 24: <300 cells/uL | 2.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 24: >=300 cells/uL | 1.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood EOS Count of <300 and >=300 Cells/uL at 6, 12 and 24 Months | Month 24: Missing | 95.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline
Percentage of participants with peripheral blood EOS count less than (\<) 100 cells per (/) micro liter (uL), 100 to \<200 cells/uL, 200 to greater than (\>) 300 cells/uL and greater than equal to (\>=) 300 cells/uL have been presented. Baseline was considered as Day 1 of inclusion date to the study (Study Day 1). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline | <100 cells/uL | 23.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline | 100 to <200 cells/uL | 26.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline | 200 to <300 cells/uL | 19.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Peripheral Blood Eosinophils (EOS) Count <100 Cells/uL, 100 to <200 Cells/uL, 200 to <300 Cells/uL and >=300 Cells/uL at Baseline | >=300 cells/uL | 30.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group
Percentage of participants with prespecified reasons to change a triple therapy (TT) (either MITT or SITT) by type of physician group have been presented. Reasons to change a triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Also, data has been presented by type of physician (general practitioners \[GP\] and pneumologists). Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. A participant may have \>1 reason, hence total percentage of participants from different categories (reasons) may not yield 100%. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Recommendation of guideline (e.g. discontinuation of ICS) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Recommendation from a referring pulmonologist or acute care clinic | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Adverse Event | 3.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Symptomatic under existing triple therapy | 24.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Other | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Missing | 24.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Deteriorating quality of life (QoL) and/or lung function despite long-term therapy | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: One or more exacerbations | 5.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Acute exacerbation | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason | 5.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Exacerbation prophylaxis | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Participants wish to change medication or device | 56.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Switching from open TT (MITT, various inhalers) to closed TT (SITT, one inhaler) | 2.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Change from twice daily to once daily | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Switching to a different type of inhaler | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Insufficient effectiveness of the previous medication | 5.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Recommendation of guideline (e.g. discontinuation of ICS) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Recommendation from a referring pulmonologist or acute care clinic | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Adverse Event | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Symptomatic under existing triple therapy | 35.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Other | 7.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | GP: Missing | 17.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Deteriorating QoL and/or lung function despite long-term therapy | 12.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: One or more exacerbations | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Acute exacerbation | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Exacerbation prophylaxis | 3.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Participants wish to change medication or device | 21.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists:Switching from open TT(MITT, various inhalers) to closed TT(SITT, 1 inhaler) | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Change from twice daily to once daily | 3.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Switching to a different type of inhaler | 9.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Prespecified Reasons to Change a Triple Therapy (Either MITT or SITT) by Type of Physician Group | Pneumologists: Insufficient effectiveness of the previous medication | 6.1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation
Percentage of participants with reasons for change from triple therapy to therapy de-escalation in overall participants group have been presented. A participant was classified as de-escalation, if there was at least one change from triple therapy to a therapy with just two components within the first 365 days of observation. Reasons for change from triple therapy to therapy de-escalation were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. A participant may have \>1 reason, hence total percentage of participants from different categories (reasons) may not yield 100%. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Deteriorating quality of life (QoL) and/or lung function despite long-term therapy | 7.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | One or more exacerbations | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Acute exacerbation | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Exacerbation prophylaxis | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Participants wish to change medication or device | 63.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Switching from open TT (MITT, various inhalers) to closed TT (SITT, one inhaler) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Change from twice daily to once daily | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Switching to a different type of inhaler | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Insufficient effectiveness of the previous medication | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Recommendation of guideline (e.g. discontinuation of ICS) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Recommendation from a referring pulmonologist or acute care clinic | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Adverse Event | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Symptomatic under existing triple therapy | 3.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Other | 7.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change From Triple Therapy to Therapy De-escalation | Missing | 22.2 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants
Percentage of participants with reasons for change in their triple therapy to another triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. Reasons for change in triple therapy to another triple therapy were documented in medical records by physician. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. A participant may have \>1 reason, hence total percentage of participants from different categories (reasons) may not yield 100%. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA | 1.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Deteriorating quality of life (QoL) and/or lung function despite long-term therapy | 6.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | One or more exacerbations | 5.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Acute exacerbation | 4.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason | 2.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Exacerbation prophylaxis | 1.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Participants wish to change medication or device | 40.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Switching from open TT (MITT, various inhalers) to closed TT (SITT, one inhaler) | 4.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Change from twice daily to once daily | 1.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Switching to a different type of inhaler | 4.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Insufficient effectiveness of the previous medication | 5.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Recommendation of guideline (e.g. discontinuation of ICS) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Recommendation from a referring pulmonologist or acute care clinic | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Adverse Event | 1.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Symptomatic under existing triple therapy | 30.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Other | 8.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons for Change in Their Triple Therapy to Another Triple Therapy in Overall Participants | Missing | 20.8 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy
Percentage of participants with reasons to change de-escalated therapy back to triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. A participant was classified as de-escalation, if there was at least one change from triple therapy to a therapy with just two components within the first 365 days of observation. Reasons to change de-escalated therapy back to triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons are included in separate categories. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Deteriorating quality of life (QoL) and/or lung function despite long-term therapy | 10.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | One or more exacerbations | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Acute exacerbation | 10.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Exacerbation prophylaxis | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Participants wish to change medication or device | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Switching from open TT (MITT, various inhalers) to closed TT (SITT, one inhaler) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Change from twice daily to once daily | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Switching to a different type of inhaler | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Insufficient effectiveness of the previous medication | 10.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Recommendation of guideline (e.g. discontinuation of ICS) | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Recommendation from a referring pulmonologist or acute care clinic | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Adverse Event | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Symptomatic under existing triple therapy | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Other | 10.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Change De-escalated Therapy Back to Triple Therapy | Missing | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group
Percentage of participants with reasons to start COPD triple therapy in overall participants group have been presented. Reasons to start COPD triple therapy were documented in medical records by physicians. These reasons have been presented in separate categories. Also, data has been presented by type of physician (general practitioners \[GP\] and pneumologists) who documented these reasons. Percentage values are rounded-off.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set. A participant may have \>1 reason to start triple therapy, hence total percentage of participants from different categories (reasons) may not yield 100%. Only those participants who were measured and analyzed (i.e., contributed data reported in the table) were included in the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed field. 'Number Analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for the specified time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Overall: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA | 23.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Overall: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA | 52.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Overall: Deteriorating quality of life and/or lung function despite long-term therapy | 32.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Overall: one or more exacerbations | 15.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Overall: Acute exacerbation | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Overall: Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason | 3.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Overall: Exacerbation prophylaxis | 21.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Overall: Participants wish to change medication or device | 20.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Overall: Other | 2.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Overall: Missing | 0.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | General practitioners: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA | 24.7 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | General practitioners: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA | 51.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | General practitioners: Deteriorating quality of life and/or lung function despite long-term therapy | 26.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | General practitioners: one or more exacerbations | 11.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | General practitioners: Acute exacerbation | 5.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | General practitioners: Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason | 2.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | General practitioners: Exacerbation prophylaxis | 31.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | General practitioners: Participants wish to change medication or device | 38.1 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | General practitioners: Other | 1.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | General practitioners: Missing | 0.2 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Pneumologists: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with ICS/LABA | 22.6 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Pneumologists: Symptomatic despite previous dual therapy with LAMA/LABA | 52.9 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Pneumologists: Deteriorating quality of life and/or lung function despite long-term therapy | 36.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Pneumologists: one or more exacerbations | 17.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Pneumologists: Acute exacerbation | 7.3 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Pneumologists: Hospitalization because of major exacerbation/other reason | 3.4 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Pneumologists: Exacerbation prophylaxis | 15.0 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Pneumologists: Participants wish to change medication or device | 8.8 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Pneumologists: Other | 2.5 Percentage of participants |
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Percentage of Participants With Reasons to Start COPD Triple Therapy in Overall and by Physician Group | Pneumologists: Missing | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Time to Death
Time to death is calculated as the duration between date of study enrollment (Day 1) and the date of death of a participant. Time to death was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Time to Death | NA Days |
Time to First Hospitalization
Time to first hospitalization is calculated as the time interval between date of study enrollment (Day 1) and the date of the first hospital admission for a relevant cause. Time to first hospitalization was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Time to First Hospitalization | NA Days |
Time to First Moderate or Severe Exacerbation
The time to first moderate or severe exacerbation was defined as the duration between onset of first moderate or severe acute exacerbation of COPD from Day 1. Moderate exacerbations are defined as COPD exacerbations that require either systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring hospitalization (including intubation and admittance to an intensive care unit) or result in death. It was evaluated by Kaplan-Maier analysis.
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Population: Full Analysis Set.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) | Time to First Moderate or Severe Exacerbation | NA Days |