Skip to content

The Effects of Sımulatıon Used in Vagınal Chıldbırth on Malpractıce Tendency And Perceptıons of Care Behavıors

The Effects of Mıxed Sımulatıon Traınıng Used in Vagınal Chıldbırth Wıth Epısıotomy on Student Medıcal Malpractıce Tendency And Perceptıons of Care Behavıors

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT04656574
Enrollment
120
Registered
2020-12-07
Start date
2016-09-26
Completion date
2017-09-18
Last updated
2020-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Behavior, Perceptions

Keywords

Episiotomy, Medical Malpractice, Perceptions, Simulation, Vaginal Childbirth

Brief summary

H1a: The simulation-based training used to provide delivery skills have an effect on malpractice trends of midwifery students. H1b: The simulation-based training used to provide delivery skills have an effect on midwifery students' perceptions of care behaviors. H0a: The simulation-based training used to provide delivery skills have not an effect on malpractice trends of midwifery students. H0b: The simulation-based training used to provide delivery skills have not an effect on midwifery students' perceptions of care behaviors.

Detailed description

The study was conducted as a single blind, prospective, and simple randomized controlled trial. The study was conducted in the fall semester of 2016 and in the fall semester of 2017 in the midwifery department of a university. The study universe comprised 79 students who took the course about vaginal delivery (which is included in the midwifery curriculum) provided using simulation-based training and 90 students taking this course for the first time. The study included 120 participants, including 60 randomly selected students who agreed to participate in the study, were enrolled in midwifery, and took the course explaining vaginal delivery for the first time and 60 randomly selected students who received this education using simulation-based training. The simulation training included the activities that midwives should do during the birth and management of vaginal delivery. Bone pelvis, fetal head, fetus, cervical dilatation-effacement, fetal descensus, maternal-neonatal birthing simulators and chicken breast model for episiotomy were used by the researchers to monitor, manage, and provide care for the progress of labor. The students in the control group received theoretical training about management and care of vaginal delivery. In addition, the researchers demonstrated them how to monitor and manage the delivery process and provide care. Data collection tools included a personal information form, medical malpractice tendency scale in nursing, and caring assessment questionnaire. Statistical analyses were made using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS) Statistics 22 software. The findings were analyzed using descriptive statistics (average, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine normal distribution of the data.

Interventions

The simulation training included the activities that midwives should do during the birth and management of vaginal delivery with episiotomy. The students received theoretical training, and to reinforce it, they were asked to mold a fetal head from a potato, make a cardboard cervix showing dilatation measurements during vaginal delivery, and make a fetal position identification model taking the occiput as a reference point.

Sponsors

Aysegul Durmaz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants didn't know which group they were allocated. The participants will be blind when they receive simulation based training from researcher.

Intervention model description

The study was conducted as a single blind, prospective, and simple randomized controlled trial. A power calculation was performed and with a standard deviation of 0.25 and statistical significance of 0.05, the number of students needed to total participate was determined to be 116, 58 per group. Out of 79 students, 60 were randomly assigned to the experimental group receiving education using simulation-based training and out of 90 students, 60 were randomly assigned to the control group that received the course explaining vaginal delivery for the first time.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* To receive simulation based training * Older than 18 years, * To Voluntary to participate, * To know how to read, write and speak in Turkish, * To do model work * Fully completed the data collection forms * To continue the all course

Exclusion criteria

* To received theoretical training, * Younger than 18 years, * Refuse to participate * Not knowing how to read, write and speak Turkish, * Not to do model work * Not to fill the questionnaire * Not to continue the course

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
medical malpractice tendency2 week after the interventionThe medical malpractice tendency scale in nursing includes routine patient care activities of the nurses. It was developed by Özata and Altunkan (14). The Likert-type scale, scored between 1 and 5, includes 49 items and consists of five subscales. The scoring is 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often, 5=Always. The minimum score is 49 and maximum is 245 points. A higher total score indicates that nurses have less medical malpractice tendencies. The scale includes five subscales: drug and transfusion administration, prevention of infections, patient monitıring and material-device safety, prevention of falls, and communication.
Perceptions of care behaviors2 week after the interventionCaring Assessment Questionnaire/Care-Q scale: The caring assessment questionnaire/Care-Q was developed by Lee, Larson, and Holzemer (18) and adapted to Turkish by Eskimez and Acaroğlu (19). This Likert-type scale, scored between 1 and 7, includes 50 items and consists of six subscales. The scoring is 1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Occasionally, 4=Sometimes, 5=Frequently, 6=Usually, 7=Every time. The minimum score is 50 and maximum is 350 points. A higher score indicates a positive increase in the frequency of providing and perceiving care behaviors. The six subscales are attainability, descriptions and facilities, comfort, expectations, reassuring communication, and observation and follow-up.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026