Covid19, Influenza A, Respiratory Disease
Conditions
Brief summary
The outbreak of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 caused a health emergency of international proportions when it was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) in January 2020. Since then, the virus has spread internationally and the WHO has classified the outbreak as a pandemic. In the context of the increasing reporting of this pandemic and the increasing governmental measures to limit or slow down the spread of SARS-CoV-2 by all means, there is so far little scientific evidence for the effects of a healthy lifestyle on the disease. The aim of this study is to compare the potential of different, possibly protective lifestyles using the example of the COVID-19 pandemic. We will conduct an online survey with 3.000 participants using mobile website technology.
Interventions
No intervention.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
\- Present declaration of consent
Exclusion criteria
\- Lack of consent to participate in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| SARS-CoV-2 infection | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Use of anthroposophic medicine | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Use of digital health services | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Use of phytotherapy | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Use of dietary supplements | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Influenza virus infection | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Other respiratory infections | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Dietary habits | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Sports activity | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Time spent in nature | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| WHO-5 Well-Being Index | Assessed when filling out the questionnaire (Baseline) | The scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest level of well-being / lowest quality of life and 100 is the highest level of well-being / highest quality of life. |
| Numeric analog scale (NAS) stress | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | The NAS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is the lowest level of stress and 10 is the highest level of stress. |
| Numeric analog scale (NAS) anxiety | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | The NAS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is the lowest level of anxiety and 10 is the highest level of anxiety. |
| Numeric analog scale (NAS) depression | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | The NAS ranges from 0 to 10, where 0 is the lowest level of anxiety and 10 is the highest level of anxiety. |
| Use of relaxation / mind body approaches | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Alcohol consumption | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Cigarette consumption | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Self-efficacy | Assessed when filling out the questionnaire (Baseline) | The scale ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 is the lowest level of self-efficacy and 100 is the highest level of self-efficacy. |
| Sick leave | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
| Use of hydrotherapy/Kneipp applications | Assessed retrospectively (last 6 months) with self-designed question | — |
Other
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Qualitative interviews | Conducted 1 month after completion of the questionnaire (once) |
Countries
Germany